Preferred Options
Search representations
Results for Mitchell Johnson-Marshall search
New searchObject
Preferred Options
PO3: Broad Location of Growth
Representation ID: 50118
Received: 06/08/2012
Respondent: Mitchell Johnson-Marshall
The large allocations will attract large developers who can enact s.106 agreements which any future outline permission will require. The scale of these allocations will squeeze out any opportunities for local businesses or future school leavers, with large firms tendering the supply of goods and labour outside the area. Also the open space between the towns of Leamington and Kenilworth must be protected. It makes no sense to locate large housing sites in this area, when employment uses are primarily located towards the south of Leamington - causing traffic problems travelling north to south.
See attachments.
Object
Preferred Options
B. Category 1 and 2 Villages
Representation ID: 50120
Received: 06/08/2012
Respondent: Mitchell Johnson-Marshall
This policy will allow for previously developed land within the category 1 & 2 villages to accommodate a total of 850 new houses. Has the local authority identified such sites to accommodate this proposal? If so, where do they exist on previously developed land? Suggest that market housing allocations are promoted within selected villages to ensure a healthy mix of houses to suit young families through to retirement couples.
See attachments.
Object
Preferred Options
Category 3 Villages
Representation ID: 50121
Received: 06/08/2012
Respondent: Mitchell Johnson-Marshall
Development is permitted on brownfiled land within the built-up areas of category 3 villages. Has the Local Authority identified such sites to accommodate this proposal? I can only identify one site in Eathorpe and it floods, so would be unlikely to receive planning permission. Without the proper identification of sites, this policy is meaningless.
See attachments.
Object
Preferred Options
D. Development on Greenfield Land
Representation ID: 50122
Received: 06/08/2012
Respondent: Mitchell Johnson-Marshall
This policy will result in very small numbers of new housing units. A more flexible policy would result in more units being provided on previously developed sites presently on 'washed over' land within the green belt. This policy should be extended to include market housing.
See attachments.
Object
Preferred Options
D. Development on Greenfield Land
Representation ID: 50124
Received: 06/08/2012
Respondent: Mitchell Johnson-Marshall
Development of garden land - this should be allowable where it can be demonstrated that there is an inefficient use of residential land and an intensification of use would be appropriate.
See attachments.
