Revised Development Strategy

Object

Representation ID: 55432

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Object on the basis that it is not appropriate to produce an interim housing figure. The housing requirement should be based on up to date evidence. Aware this is being prepared and the local plan preparation should await the findings of the housing study.

Object

Representation ID: 56549

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Object on basis that the identification of the location of housing development is not -based on the correct approach required by the NPPF. The correct approach to Green -Belt review and sustainability would result in fewer housing units being identified on -greenfield land to the south of Warwick. Instead, land at Blackdown, to the north of -Leamington, would be identified as a broad location for some of the housing required -in the district.

Object

Representation ID: 56550

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

Object for reasons outlined under objection to RDS1 and RDS3

Object

Representation ID: 56551

Received: 29/07/2013

Respondent: Commercial Estates Group

Agent: Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners

The extensive highway mitigation works referred to, and the costs associated with this, would not be required if the distribution of development was rebalanced, as
outlined above.