Proposed Modifications January 2016

Object

Representation ID: 68978

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Nuneaton and Bedworth are reluctant to take their share of the unmet need, this relates to the claimed constraints in the authority. Indeed in the Pre Submission version of the Nuneaton and Bedworth plan there was a shortfall of some 201 units per annum. There is therefore a concern about whether or not the housing needs of the HMA are being met in full.
The plan should also consider need from the Birmingham HMA where there is an unidentified need for 38,000 dwellings which may have knock on effects for Warwick

Object

Representation ID: 69928

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

There is a need to allocate an additional layer of small to medium sites (circa 50-150 dwellings per site) to deliver additional housing in the first 5 years of the plan, to meet both the additional level of unmet HMA need and to provide a 5 year land supply. We believe that by identifying such sites, either through the allocation of omission sites or by giving consideration to the extension or enlargement of existing smaller allocations, it will be possible adopt a sound plan.

Object

Representation ID: 69929

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

There is a need to allocate an additional layer of small to medium sites (circa 50-150 dwellings per site) to deliver additional housing in the first 5 years of the plan, to meet both the additional level of unmet HMA need and to provide a 5 year land supply. We believe that by identifying such sites, either through the allocation of omission sites or by giving consideration to the extension or enlargement of existing smaller allocations, it will be possible adopt a sound plan.

Object

Representation ID: 69930

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Picture on 5 year housing land supply, which the plan will provide upon adoption, is unclear.
Gladman acknowledge the trajectory produced alongside the
Proposed Modifications it is not made directly clear how this translates to a land supply position

From our initial calculations, and using the data as submitted in the Council's
trajectory, for the period 2016/17 to 2020/21 we calculate that only a 4.53 year land supply exists.
We are unsure the Council are claiming that the submitted plan will provide a 5 year housing land supply upon adoption

Object

Representation ID: 69931

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Gladman have concerns therefore that the Local Plan is not fully dealing with the issue of unmet need. In that context we

question the soundness of the current mechanism for plan review, which in theory could trigger an immediate review of the Local Plan. It would seem sensible to deal with these issues now.

Object

Representation ID: 69932

Received: 22/04/2016

Respondent: Gladman Developments

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Gladman have concerns therefore that the Local Plan is not fully dealing with the issue of unmet need. In that context we

question the soundness of the current mechanism for plan review, which in theory could trigger an immediate review of the Local Plan. It would seem sensible to deal with these issues now.