Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7166

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Katie-Louise Hopkins

No jobs in the area currently with 10,000 new families where are the jobs to support them.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7169

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Chris Hopkins

In turn lack of jobs to support 10,000 more families will be detrimental not only to those families but to existing families.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7172

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Penny Hopkins

Where are the jobs for 10,000 new families where are the schools for 20,000 more children.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7185

Derbyniwyd: 16/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs A Andrews

There are not the jobs for people to want to live in the area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7199

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: The Occupiers

Where will the jobs be for all the new people moving into the area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7205

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs B Thorne

Many people are out of work, companies closed. People apply for jobs to try and stay in the area they live and for their childrens education and close to family. Focus on jobs for the people who are here now. Don't make them move as you see housing so important.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7211

Derbyniwyd: 09/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs H Williams

We have no work or industry in this area and will only put people in trouble claiming.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7219

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Bill Hart

How on earth can a 'core strategy' involve building the equivalent of a small town in an area that is bleeding jobs?
Would make more sense to build smaller developments closer to areas where there is more work.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7228

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs D Stacey

There are no jobs, factories closed, companies going into administration - where will these people work (e.g. 10 jobs in the paper this week). The West Midlands has had the highest rise in unemployment in the UK!!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7275

Derbyniwyd: 17/08/2009

Ymatebydd: R Harris

As there are no jobs who are the houses for?

Sylw

ID sylw: 7279

Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009

Ymatebydd: The Occupier

Not enough schools or work in this area for existing residents.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7292

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Louise Young

The roads are busy enough and with lots of job losses in the area I feel Whitnash folk are being neglected on their views by the local council.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7320

Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G A Cox

As stated before, where are the jobs for all these people who would buy these homes and is there really a shortage of houses for sale in this area anyway?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7363

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: The Occupier

There is no proven requirement for any significant increase in housing to support local employment requirements.
One has only to look at the traffic travelling on to the M40 both south and north also to the full car parks at Warwick Parkway to realise that any additional housing here will serve only as a dormitory area to serve the larger 25 miles or more areas where various levels of employment exist.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7399

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sackville Developments

Asiant : Framptons

It is recommended that the preferred option be amended to introduce the following new bullet point
- To support Class C2 uses that generate employment opportunities as part of a mixed use with offices/hi-technology

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 7408

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Parkridge Development Land Ltd

Asiant : Holmes Antill

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7416

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A Dobrovin - Pennington

Object to the need for any more employment sites in the area when there are already numerous vacant industrial units in this area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7434

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management & William Davies Ltd

Asiant : Stoneleigh Planning

The Preferred Options do not make sufficient provision for land for employment across the District and more specifically for uses B1a and B1b which will be the principle drivers of the future growth and prosperity for the sub-region.

No great reliance should be placed on the existing forward supply of employment land to meet most of the changing requirements for employment sites.

Additional employment land therefore needs to be identified which can in part be met by the allocation of the site at Gallows Hill in the Core Strategy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7442

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: University of Warwick

Asiant : Turley

It is questionable whether the Core Strategy can account for the contribution of the University expansion towards its employment land supply, despite the potential for employment generation.

The University fully supports the option of removing the built-up area of the existing campus from the Green Belt and identifying it as a strategic site for development (for university purposes). The exceptional circumstances needed in order to remove the land can be demonstrated on the very special circumstances accepted as part of the masterplan proposals.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 7461

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Hatton Estate

Asiant : RPS Planning

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7496

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: The Occupiers

Demise of existing firms in District - many residents particularly people living in Warwick Gates work outside area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7516

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Ashbourne

Many people have left the area looking for jobs with the demise of AP, Fords, Wolseley, IBM. Commercial buildings remain empty.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7537

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr George Jones

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 7564

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Asiant : Framptons

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7630

Derbyniwyd: 14/12/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Boyle

Asiant : Brown and Co

In terms of land allocations, we do feel that insufficient consideration has been given to the wider regional picture and that too much details is provided on the strategic sites. We feel that there are other more suitable sites available and that at this stage the plan should be more general in terms of its direction for growth without site specific details being put forward. If these are not deliverable, as we understand has yet to be proved, then the plan may generally not be deliverable and sustainable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7655

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs Forrester of Loes Farm, Guys Cliffe

Asiant : Barlow Associates Limited

Land west of Guys Cliuffe could in part be used for live/work units.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 7675

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ray Bullen

Significant areas of employment land have been vacant for last economic cycle. Insufficient demand for further employment.
Types of employment are changing to high technology based which is more suitable for mixed development. Better opportunities for shorter journeys to work reducing transport/parking needs. Allows better use of land with multi-storey provision giving more jobs/ha. can be more acceptable to town centre. Little benefit in more warehousing - gives few low grade jobs/ha. Existing poorly used employment land should be comprehensively planned to give high return jobs/ha, improving brownfield sites and relaxing demand on agricultural land. Agriculture hardly gets a mention.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 33530

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure

Asiant : G R Planning Consultancy Ltd

The allocation of the Former Goods Yard site in the adopted Local Plan for employment uses (specifically B1 development) should be maintained. This allocation should be promoted in conjunction with the potential for the site to also be developed for residential purposes as part of the comprehensive redevelopment of the Stagecoach and Former Quick's Garage sites.

In relation to the smaller BRBR site, there is no reason as to why this should not be allocated for residential development with the option of it being developed separately.

Sylw

ID sylw: 33539

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Rail Property Ltd & Network Rail Infrastructure

Asiant : G R Planning Consultancy Ltd

We would request therefore that the DCS include a further employment allocation to accommodate a relocated Bus Depot. In our view (and as the Station Area Brief accepts within its written text) the former Ford Car Park site remains the best and most suitable location to accommodate Stagecoach's requirements.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 33551

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Crackley Residents' Association

Does not agree with employment/ development on the Kings Hill site because of the reasons detalied above- i.e. adverse impact on the green belt.