Sylw

ID sylw: 109

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R A Chapleo

There must be no constriction of the already narrow Green Belt north of Milverton. To allow such would be a hypocritical conflict with other objectives that require an healthy environment.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 179

Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Holmes

Much of this is commonsense and reasonable, but I totally reject the option of building on land that is currently designated as Green Belt, north of Milverton.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 204

Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 225

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I strongly disagree with the need to provide land for Coventry's employment needs south of Green Lane, in Finham, and the council should limit itself purely to brown-field sites when looking for expansion of housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 249

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson

The land at IBM and the Ford Foundry should be used for employment. Suggest develop further aroung Coventry and Warwick University.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 310

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Warden

It's the easy option is to use Green Belt land, but worse to identify these locations then stop building mid phase like the Jaguar Whitley site. Phase 1 complete - Phases 2 & 3 postponed??? How were the figures for manufacturing requirements arrived at? There are plenty of Brownfield sites ready to re-develop within coventry/Warwickshire (Peugeot, Jaguar, Dunlop, Courtaulds, etc) if needed. The manufacturing industry has suffered massive decline over the past few decades, so why the sudden need to increase manufacturing capacity now? Shutting the gate after the horse has bolted springs to mind!!! Save our Green Belt!!!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 316

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Yes to development of Brown-field sites. Have all such sites been explored ? Keep off Green Field land.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 420

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

The Ford foundry site would be ideal employment land also IBM Warwick. Easy access by public transport, would help ease congestion.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 471

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 527

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Stratton

Only brownfield sites should be used. These should be absolutely exhausted before any greenfield is even considered.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 541

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 593

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2009

Ymatebydd: B A Alston

General support, green belt to north of leamington (milverton) must not be permitted

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 603

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 664

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Edkins

A great number of employment facilities are closing down so these areas could be used instead of providing new areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 694

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood

No. All brownfield sites must be used first.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 765

Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Faye Davis

Yes.

Sylw

ID sylw: 884

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mining Remediation Authority

The CA has no preference for any of the options.It is noted that there are proposals for expanding Warwick University and that these will contribute towards the employment land supply within the District
The CS should make reference for the need to obtain information on the mining position/ground conditions and incorporate any mitigation measures that may be required as part of the development process

Land instability/mining legacy need not prevent development and that development can offer an opportunity to treat any existing hazards to the benefit of local communities/interests of overall sustainability/public safety

To comply with national guidance as set out in PPG14

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 897

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Christine Betts

There are numerous empty office vlocks in the district e.g. Warwick Technology Park - have these been considered?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 950

Derbyniwyd: 22/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Rycroft

Absolutely not on Greenbelt or Greenfield sites.

By allowing building on greenfield sites it makes it less economical for companies to regenerate urban areas and brownfield sites thus massive building in Warwick District will see urban areas of Coventry and Birmingham neglected and socially depleted.

There are plenty of brownfield sites across the district that would be suitable subject to good quality road infrastructure being provided to them. These must be used first.

If you regenerated the socially depleted areas first then maybe less people would want to leave them and therefore reduce the strain on Warwick District.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 958

Derbyniwyd: 23/08/2009

Ymatebydd: E Keogh

Failure to recognise or identify numerous undeveloped brownfield sites and empty employment premises.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 963

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Kirit Marvania

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 980

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1053

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Land around Longbridge (north towards Chase Meadow and east towards the River Avon) should be considered.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1057

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pamela Beedham

However, 5.14 - Gardens should not be regarded as brownfield sites but should be protected - station approach 5.16 should be kept as employment land but well landscaped.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1131

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Alice Jarrett

Green Belt should not be industrialized, Coventry already has sufficient employment land.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1165

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Barry Elliman

There are already many offices that are empty. More manufacturing should be encouraged first.

Sylw

ID sylw: 1218

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrew Horsley

No -
There are several industrial units that lie vacant already on Tachbrook Par, Heathcote Ind, Sydenham, Queensway, Warwick Technology Park. Why do we need more?
NB Several have lain vacant for many years.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1266

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Margrave

The preference should be to identify and use all brown field sites and to identify all current empty employment buildings. These should be used to count towards the total amount of ha.

Also the plan is only considering land suggested by land-owners. Consideration of land north of Leamington should be given.

The existing heavy traffic and congestion around *Land west of Europa Way, Warwick and *Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane should rule-out at such a large development at these areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1288

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Sarah Jane Horsley

No
Look at all th empty industrial units on Heathcote, Tachbrook Park and Warwick Technology Park. Why do we need more units building?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1356

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Guide Dogs for the Blind Association

Asiant : DNS Planning and Design Consultants

More employment land is needed, particularly new business/enterprise parks. More encouragement towards new business and new enterprise as possible.

The Council has not considered other options in more rural areas of the district.

For example, It is not always appropriate to locate a new guide dog training school in an urban centre, where housing is close by.
The Core Strategy Preferred Options could be more flexible and response to the needs of differing organizations. Identification of new supply, could consider the types of sui-generis uses that may need to be accommodated on employment land, and locate it accordingly.