BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4427
Derbyniwyd: 29/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J & P Foley
More jobs needed - not enough for people living here.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4481
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Brian Hier
People need employment to earn money to buy homes. Who will be living in new homes? Until resurgence in the economy, picture is unclear - another reason for more measured approach to housing development.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4498
Derbyniwyd: 30/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs D Matthews
Object to site at Kings Hill:
Where are jobs for increasing population even after recovering from the recession.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4506
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs E R Matthews
Object to sites south of Whitnash:
Further loss of employment opportunities and therefore inward migration.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4509
Derbyniwyd: 29/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association
Main emphasis seems to be on housing.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4513
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A K McArthur
Object to Plan 5:
Is there associated strategy for new businesses?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4517
Derbyniwyd: 30/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Julie and Ronald Hyde and Miles
No new employers to support need for house numbers proposed.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4579
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris
support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4648
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Blundell
Not enough jobs in area for existing residents.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4651
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt
I would object to any greenfield sites to be used for employment, land used for employment in the past has since been used for housing, ie. Dalehouse Lane, Kenilworth!!!!
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4690
Derbyniwyd: 02/10/2009
Ymatebydd: E Holroyde
Extra people unlikely to find jobs near to home increasing commuting.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4696
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Cllr. Prof Maurice Shutler
Need a Core Strategy constructed by WDC starting with affordable homes for genuinely affordable homes for lcoal people providing jobs to go with them.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4756
Derbyniwyd: 02/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Cllr Bob Dhillon and family
Why was employment at Warwick University stated knowing that major redundancy programme starting?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4759
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs John & Margaret Pyner
Object to Kings Hill site:
We are in a downturn. No prospect of jobs returning to Coventry.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4772
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Anthony and Pauline Coutts-Smith
What is meant by employment land? Will factories be built on green belt land?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4777
Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Julian H and Judith M Wood
Object to Thickthorn site:
Insufficient employment opportunity in Kenilworth to justify and accommodate additional inhabitants.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4787
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: richard keylock
This statement is not made clear in the proposal. Not clear to me what "employment land" implies
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4803
Derbyniwyd: 18/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Ian Frost
No, new employers should be encouraged to take over sites vacated by departed employers of which there are a good number. Any new employment locations should be well away from Warwick/Leamington since the roads into those towns are already over stretched, people even travel straight through Warwick (and queue in the process) to get to the business park on the south
side. Was that planned for?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4822
Derbyniwyd: 07/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison
Qualified YES - The approach is piecemeal and lacks a coherent thrust. The response to climate change is woefully inadequate - adapatation isn't just about reducing flood risk, nor just about new development.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4826
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke
To plan for using green belt land for housing is bad enough but to consider it for employment use is bothy criminal and madness when so many other options are available
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4852
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke
Far too much land has been allocated for employment. Many redundant sites ( some new like Gallaghers on Heathcote) have been empty for years. Already many people work from home or in small teams, the trend will increase. These brown field sites should be redesignated for housing.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4976
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Richard J Bennett
Object to Kings Hill site:
Can't imagine influx of people as no jobs, not even a passenger airport.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4996
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs P E Hunt
Object to sites at Bishops Tachbrook/Warwick Gates:
Employment - that generated by development will end when contract complete leaving more unemployed. Govt. should be supporting existing businesses and safeguarding jobs.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5023
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Michael Morris
Whilst the principles of maintaining a thriving economy are sound any new development showed be kept within the present towns and on brown field sites.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5072
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Keylock
This statement is ambiguous thus I am unable to comment further
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5098
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood
Many retail/industrial units are vacant in disrepair. Encourage development here.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5106
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Patrick Ring
Object to sites south of Warwick, Whitnash and Leamington:
No local need for housing and no extra employment opportunities available.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5114
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts
Development should be directed towards brown field sites. For example ex Ford, Peurgeot works (etc etc). Also there is already too many run down areas within the towns, these areas should not be ignored and allowed to decay further to benefit developers.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5188
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Sonia Owczarek
NO DO NOT AGREE - Due to Inappropriate use of and building/development on GREEN BELT LAND!
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5264
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J. N. Price
As already noted and although I did not express any views on the 'Issues Paper', I concur with the view expressed in clause 5.5 that development of employment opportunities in Kenilworth is highly desireable