BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2289
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S Shanahan
Many people have left the area looking for jobs with the demise of AP, Fords, Wolseley, IBM. Commercial buildings remain empty.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2301
Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009
Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2311
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: M Wiles
Many people have left the area looking for jobs with the demise of AP, Fords, Wolseley, IBM. Commercial buildings remain empty.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2383
Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Roy Standley
No.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2420
Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly
No.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2474
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr G.C. Allman
No I do not. Seems to me that they have listened to a developer who has their eyes on an easy to develop green field site rather than considering numerous empty brown field sites (Ryton, Ford etc.) that would be more suitable - if there is even the demand for new employment land - which is debatable at the moment!
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2521
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp
Agree
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2547
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson
Nifer y bobl: 2
KENILWORTH Industrial/retail units already empty in Kenilworth. Focus should be to attract new investment to these premises before building more.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2606
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: John Arnold
Do not agree with Thickthorn as it will severly impact on glasshouse lane residents (traffic etc).
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2666
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2729
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale
Land in Warwick should not be set aside to meet Coventry's needs. Why designate former industrial sites for housing e.g. Former Fords Factory and Station Approach Leamington they are low lying and could be subject to flooding.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2783
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield
This is not reasonable at either Thickthorn or Finham.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2825
Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2864
Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2920
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council
This council believes that the WDC has identified appropriate locations with the serious exceptions that Lower Heathcote/south of Harbury Lane should be retained as an area of restraint to preserve valuable agricultural land and respect the natural boundary to development provided by Harbury Lane.
This council also believes that the area at Finham/south of Coventry should be used to accommodate WDC's allocation of employment land rather than being yielded to Coventry for its needs.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2968
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
Can't some one see that we ( England as a whole) and Coventry area in particular has lost virtually all of its manufacturing industry plus the skills that go with them.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3025
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Rhyan Barry
The council should be in negotiations with the owners of any vacant buildings to ensure the maximum use of existing sites before looking at destroying green belt. There may as well be no such expression if it means so little.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3071
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000
Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris
EXCEPT for area south of Harbury Lane in the Parish of Bishops Tachbrook.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3135
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield
To a limited extend only as Kenilworth is largely a dormitory town. No need therefore at Thickthorn and Finham.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3140
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: John Murphy
WDC has identified appropriate locations with the serious exceptions that Lower Heathcote/south of Harbury Lane MUST be retained as an area of restraint to preserve valuable agricultural land and respect the natural boundary to development provided by Harbury Lane.
We also believe that the area at Finham/south of Coventry should be used to accommodate WDC's allocation of employment land rather than being yielded to Coventry for its needs.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3194
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw
No building on North Leamington Allotments
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3255
Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers
Sites that have already been built are not being used, many are empty. Why the need to build more?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3307
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Caroline Martin
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3340
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3355
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3381
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3429
Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs J Morby
Employment land not needed as vacant premises in Leamington area to meet any demand
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3438
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3471
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby
King's Hill is not suitable.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3509
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Owen
Object