Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3540

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Insufficient jobs in Warwick/Leamington for residents of 4300 new homes so will increase commuting

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3658

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

Green belt should be protected from development for this purpose.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3687

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

Employment land is required for the "Office/High Tech R&D/Light Industrial" sector - small enterprises and start-ups offering services and products for a digital, virtual world. Rather than zoning sites and allocating a percentage as employment land, the District should consider minimising land take with the approach of "zero commuting" - where one's employment and housing can co-exist in the same building footprint - like maisonettes over shops. This could free up 20ha (800 dwellings-worth) of land.

Sylw

ID sylw: 3742

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs L J Stevens

Vacant factories and offices in Warwick and Leamington - where will new residents work? Existing residents at Warwick Gates commute out of area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3743

Derbyniwyd: 13/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Alan N Gandy

Horror at vast numbers of houses proposed. Do not need or desire development on this scale. Unclear who is to be accommodated. Growth suggests job market likely to expand and unemployment fall - bringing thousands more people in will increase competition for jobs to detriment of current residents. Sudden growth in job market seems unlikely so housing plans not put forward as part of local need. Many new homes on the market and all local needs met.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3846

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

The council has not looked at the different ways of providing employment. They are fixated on providing employment land. Perhaps they can indicate what would be built eg, how many factories, what type of products would be produced, how many warehouses, what they would store, what transport links are required. They might be pleasantly surprised at how many different types of locations are available to them and they may move away from providing land as the only employment option. If its only LAND they are interested in then make sure it is where the BEST transport links are available.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3852

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

So many people are out of work and in this day and age of peoples where are the 3500 going to come from - Coventry and Warwickshire.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3892

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: L M D Louise, Matthew, David Drinkhall Paul Kalus Anthony Barrett

Basis for homes is national population growth. Imposing massive growth where little expansion of employment results in commuting.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3898

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S S Khera

Object to Kings Hill Site. Homes should be built when there is a demand and employment nearby. In current economic downturn there are not enough jobs for existing households, nevermind new ones.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3902

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim Matthews

The brownfield site adjacent to the recycling facility a Pipers Lane, Kenilworth is clearly more suiable as employment land than that at Thickthorne, Kenilworth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3979

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

Sylw

ID sylw: 4015

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Need to preserve Green Belt and to ensure infrastructure development is realistic for plan.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4021

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I support the need to develop employment sites. Where possible sites that have been previously used for employment but factories closed down etc should be used for employment. there is a need to develop more empl opportunities in Kenilworth to avoid the numbers who have to travel outside of Kenilworth to work.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4122

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Colin Sharp

Population and employment growth figures unsubstantiated.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4128

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A D Fryer

Coventry is shrinking not growing due to lack of manufacturing work.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4163

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Heigl

Reduced employment since demise of AP, Fords, IBM and work not available for incomers. People commute elsewhere to work, especially at Warwick Gates.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4173

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Rural Community Council

WRCC is concerned that most of the identified sites will encourage commuting and take no account of the sustainablity agenda. Nowhere in the options is any consideration of the need to provide support for the rural economy and the need to keep village shops and services open.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4189

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

Given the current stated imbalance & to reduce traffic employment areas need to be allocated to the Kenilworth, North of Leamington and Warwick areas. These areas have relatively good access to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. This would maximise use of existing infrastructure & mean less traffic having to go through Leamington & Warwick centres. Please re-consider.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4227

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Aldi Stores Ltd

Asiant : WYG Planning & Design

Paragraph 5.15:
The Council's Employment Land Review suggests that the Queensway Employment Allocation Site is one where it would be appropriate to restrict future uses to offices/high tech employment. In the light of a substantial period of unsuccessful marketing of this site for B1, B2 and/or B8 uses, such a re-allocation would be strenuously opposed by the site owners. The site is not commercially suited for purely high tech/office use in the context of other available sites in the District, which are more appropriate for such uses.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4229

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Aldi Stores Ltd

Asiant : WYG Planning & Design

Paragraph 5.16:
The existing allocation site at Queensway is also an appropriate site to be considered for the introduction of non-employment uses and greater flexibility in the range of permissible uses, in order to provide a catalyst for employment related development on the remainder of the site, given the historic difficulty in achieving development on this site purely for B1, B2 and B8 uses.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4231

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

Employment areas should be allocated to the Kenilworth, North of Leamington/Warwick areas. Road networks are good & traffic flow is lower, so with good access to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40 this would benefit the town centres. This would make better use of existing infrastructure and spread additional traffic more evenly.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4288

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: H R Anderson

Object to Thickthorn site:
Beautiful area of Kenilworth.
Town lacks resources to cater for so many new residents. Extra traffic
Where is money coming from for such a project?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4296

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heather Cooper

Object to Kings Hill site:
Any new development should be employment led - why build new houses in area of high unemployment? Where would these people go to work?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4302

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Wade

Object to Kings Hill site:
Unemployment set to rise, where are the jobs?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4319

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor E Wood

Should look at empty units on Heathcote Industrial Estate, Warwick Technology Park, Shires Park, Sydenham town centres etc before building more factories etc.
Engineering/business leaving area not coming in which is flaw in strategy.
Stated South Leamington is desirable place to live and not wanting people to travel across town so purchase Coventry Airport and no-one would have to travel across town. Council should be pro active in this respect.
Suggest:
Employ small committee of general public to work with WDC to look at opportunities for development if needed..
Buy Coventry Airport
Develop town centre properties rather than make a ghost town of closed shops and expensive parking.
Develop Old Town
Develop Althorpe Street
Develop Flavels and surrounding area
Suggest financially driven and not for any other purpose
Why is this correct strategy if a Conservative govt. would shelve process?
Will not gain public support until demonstrate that all brown field areas have been examined and a robust plan in place.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4343

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Clive Letchford

Lack of indication of where people will be employed - already significant numbers of commuters

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4355

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A Picken

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4394

Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Employment and Transport - Not clear where new inhabitants will work. Not employment for them in Warwick/Leamington, therefore need to commute. Roads can't cope with more cars. Increased traffic would impinge on remainder of Leamington and Warwick and greater number of cars need to use limited existing routes across towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4407

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Where are jobs for new residents? Many existing residents commute. Generates more traffic, pollution, global warming and carbon emissions.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4421

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: G M Langston

Associated strategy to develop new business requested - is such a strategy live and financed and how do two strategies dovetail?
Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict outdated or sub-standard factory/business units. Why are such opportunities not being adopted?