Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3383

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Would help cut down on road traffice

Sylw

ID sylw: 3444

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

Population growth not accepted. Many east Europeans are returning home. Birth control strategies are expected to reduce UK population. Failure to consider the impact of Global warming. Climate change will alter the basis for decision making. Essential to retain green belt for farming we need to be self sufficient.
Also the need to reduce carbon footprints with more locally grown produce. Increasing fuel costs will cause foreign imports to become increasingly expensive.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3510

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3662

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3688

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

The type of employment that is expected in Warwick District is the "Office/High Tech R&D/Light Industrial" sector. The "High Tech R&D/Light Industrial" description indicates a development such as a "Science Park" which should be as close to the University as possible to tap into the research talent there. The Lower Heathcote Farm site is the site furthest from the University area - and a town centre - it is the most unsuitable for employment land

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3834

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

Suggestions for the type of employment we should encourage included, high technology industries, service sector jobs, tourism, biotechnology and professional and financial/business services.

You have not stated HOW MANY new jobs you need to create. You have not done ANY research to the type of jobs already in existence eg, people working from home vs those working in sites that require land eg factories, retail, offices. You are fixated on LAND - why is your land fixation greater than the public response? Difficult to support a proposal so badly flawed.

Use up the land you have before assigning any more.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3839

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

Suggestions for the type of employment we should encourage included, high technology industries, service sector jobs, tourism, biotechnology and professional and financial/business services.

There is already enough available land for the above industries. The Ford foundary closed - so the thought of providing land for factories or light industry does not reflect the current situation.
Use up the land you have before assigning any more.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3854

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

I do not know of Lower Heathcote planned site or Harbury Lane - Protest

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3943

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

This site is an appropriate location as part of a balanced packege to meet future employment needs

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3977

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

There is already available employemnt land within the immediate area that has not been taken up, so why allocate more. Insufficeint infastructure in an already congested area

Sylw

ID sylw: 4020

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

I don't have detailed area knowledge to inform an opinion on this.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4023

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

this is not an area I know so can not comment

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4190

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

Due to shortage of employment to the north of the district areas need to be allocated to the Kenilworth, North of Leamington and Warwick areas. These areas have relatively good access to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. This would maximise use of existing infrastructure & mean less traffic having to go through Leamington & Warwick centres

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4234

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

No should be Kenilworth, Finham, Baginton Airport, North of Leamington/Warwick areas. This would reduce traffic in town centres and provide good access traffic from/to the A46, A45/M45 and the M40. There are already large areas of employment to the south of the district

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4356

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A Picken

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4510

Derbyniwyd: 29/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

lack of appropriate existing traffic infrastructure.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4580

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4656

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

Is land brown fields, green belt or 'productive ? We may need more land to be self -sufficient with food!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4804

Derbyniwyd: 18/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Ian Frost

Object. Not convinced of need. Are there not vacant sites/buildings struggling to find occupiers?

Sylw

ID sylw: 4827

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke

I do not have detailed knowledge of this site,if it is green belt I totally object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4853

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke

Strongly object - this will wreck Tachbrook Valley and threaten rural setting on Bishop's Tachbrook village. Harbury lane is a strong boundary between the urban and country landscapes and should not be crossed. The proposed Area of Restraint should be extended up to Harbury Lane.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4870

Derbyniwyd: 07/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison

Qualified Ues - It is impossible to give a reasoned response without knowing the infrastructure implications etc.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5024

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Morris

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5104

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood

Object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5115

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts

Green Space! This area is mature countryside with long established eco systems. Development here would require massive infrastructure development (bourne by existing home owners in the long run) and would turn the area into an urban sprawl and potential (new) deprived area due to the volumes of (supported) housing proposed. I'm also concerned with the implications of climate change and the rising water table, development here would put drainage pressures onto the lower lying areas and destroy local wildlife.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5189

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sonia Owczarek

Over development.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5326

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

It is not necessary to re classify arable land for employment before all long-neglected employment land has been fully utilized.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5377

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5566

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

I support the object provided it is not on existing green belt and that the developments are zero carbon buildings NOW - or together as low carbon communities through the use of decentralized energy.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5617

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: PG Swann

support - These sites are natural urban fringe locations; not in the Green Belt; : well located within the existing urban framework; compact and physically ideal for development; have a good relationship to the strategic road framework; are sufficiently close to the two main town centres and to more recently established communities facilities; will provide opportunity for the Planning and Highway Authorities to secure Planning Gain to provide a well co-ordinated comprehensive development scheme and to provide and enhance the local community and highway/pedestrian/cycleway and other infrastructure facilities and overcome existing problems in this part of the District.