BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39321
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Melissa and Tom Horrocks
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39331
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr S Payne
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39341
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Janet Morritt
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39351
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs H S Johnson
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39361
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Dr Eirian Curzon
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39371
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr R Virdi
Recent Bishops Tachbrook Housing Needs Survey indicated only 15 houses required. Do not need the proposed 4200 houses.
The additional 4200 houses located between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the identity of Bishops Tachbrook as a village and if it became another suburb of Leamington, it would reduce the quality of life for the community of Warwick Gates.
Proposed large housing development would lack social cohesion resulting in anti social behaviour - there are poor public transport links to meet the needs of proposed 40% affordable homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39378
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs J Farrington
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39380
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs J Farrington
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39386
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: D R Ariss
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39388
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: D R Ariss
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39394
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: G Lane
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39396
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: G Lane
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39402
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: M Weeks
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39404
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: M Weeks
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39410
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs R Johns
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39412
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs R Johns
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39418
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr David Fisher
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39420
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr David Fisher
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39426
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Oliver
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39428
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Oliver
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39434
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J W Underhill
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39436
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J W Underhill
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39442
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: C M Copoon
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39444
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: C M Copoon
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39450
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Liam Floyd
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39452
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Liam Floyd
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39458
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S Morris
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39460
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S Morris
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39466
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S Aitken
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 39468
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S Aitken
Woodside Farm was the subject of a Government Review some 2/3 years ago and the outcome was not to develop this land.