Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 123

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R A Chapleo

No - The Council must double its efforts to release empty dwellings to the market.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 158

Derbyniwyd: 07/07/2009

Ymatebydd: G Ralph

The land north of Milverton is prime agricultural land and at Saxon Mill includes historical buildings. This is all prime greenfield land and should not be considered for building upon.

Sylw

ID sylw: 168

Derbyniwyd: 07/07/2009

Ymatebydd: mr John Wheatcroft

How about new housing in and around Whitnash and Radforsd Semele area - just a thought

Sylw

ID sylw: 197

Derbyniwyd: 12/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoffrey Field

I wish to comment on the perceived housing need of an additional 6,000 units to meet the RDA target of 10,800 units. Does any WDC research or evidence exist which supports this level of housing need?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 229

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I do not agree with the identification of ANY new housing on green-field sites.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 259

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson

The WDC appears only to be interested in new housing developments regardless of impact. Local landowners/trusts have too much influence e.g. Oken trust, Henry VIII trust. They do not appear to be acting in the interests of the local community.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 268

Derbyniwyd: 13/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Jordan

I don't see evidence for building on such a large scale. Building of new industrial units has come to a standstill, schools already at capacity. Where are the jobs in the area to support this influx of people?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 294

Derbyniwyd: 14/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Leamington and County Golf Club

Land towards the western end of Harbury Lane at its junction with Heathcote Lane.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 328

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

Disagree there is a need to protect existing suitable employment land. There are many vacant sites in the District at present. Housing should be the priority.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 355

Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Pounds

Finham
Baginton
Land South of Kenilworth
Thickthorn
Land North East of Kenilworth
West and North West of Warwick A46 corridor.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 433

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

No.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 484

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 532

Derbyniwyd: 02/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Stratton

Building on greenfield sites must not be allowed. There are multiple new builds already in existence which have not been sold surely this provides some indication that the level of housing requirements need to be reviewed for every area. Huge concerns about existing infrastructure and services ability to cope with increased demand.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 554

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 617

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 676

Derbyniwyd: 07/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Anna Sampson

Do not agree

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 681

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Smith

Use existing housing stock more sensibly and put Warwick District houses on Warwick District land close to Coventry before looking elsewhere to ruin green belt land.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 707

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood

Needs investigation.

Sylw

ID sylw: 749

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: West Midlands RSL Planning Consortium

Asiant : Tetlow King Planning

PPS3 clearly states that allowance should not be made for windfall within the first 10 years of housing land supply "unless Local Planning Authorities can provide robust evidence of genuine local circumstances that prevent specific sites being identified." (paragraph 59). We therefore strongly recommend that the Council actively seek to identify greenfield sites where development should be located to meet housing requirements, as already demonstrated in the Preferred Growth Strategy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 778

Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Faye Davis

Firstly, I am concerned that the amount of new housing required is too high and unrealistic.
Secondly, I do not believe that enough work has been carried out to establish current brownfield sites that are empty that could be developed for housing instead of using greenfield sites.

Sylw

ID sylw: 819

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Dinsdale

I would object bery strongly if any more housing was planned for the Milverton Allotment/Milverton green belt lad in north Leamington. Also the infrastructure just isn't there. We cannot go on building at an unsustainable rate and maintain any kind of life/wildlife balance. We need the wildlife otherwise we will become a sterile land in which nothing will survive.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 827

Derbyniwyd: 14/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Bannister

I cannot support the building of houses on Kings Hill. Extra houses on a Green Belt on the edge of Coventry is not necessary. Coventry's population has decreased by 30,000 in the last generation. As there are no jobs how can people afford houses especially in an area where there are no jobs. Coventry council must not be allowed to use land in Warwickshire just because they requested a larger percentage of housing than any other authority in the West Midlands.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 846

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Adrian Farmer

The council should fight any impossed expansion in this district and only meet the requirements of the local community

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 910

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Christine Betts

I think Coventry / Nuneaton / Bedworth have much more land availability and better infrastructure to support more houses than rural areas of Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 977

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Kirit Marvania

Green Belt is not reasonable.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 999

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon

But - the RSS figures are excessive and probably unachievable.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1076

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pamela Beedham

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1105

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs T Robinson

Some development/growth should be spread around the many surrounding villages. Many villages to the south and east would benefit, e.g.Radford Semele, Bishops Itchington, Lighthorne Heath & area towards and into Southam.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1156

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Alice Jarrett

Green Belt should not be industrialized. Housing would be bad enough but 'employment' land would be criminal as Coventry already has sufficient.

This is the first example of "Warwick CC" doing their "Pontius Pilate" act of suggesting Kings Hill development "only to meet Coventry's needs". Who is therefore responsible. Warwick should be protecting that land.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1178

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Barry Elliman

More use should be made of empty houses. Empty office blocks could be made inot apartments for low rent single or double persons - derelict industrial sites used first.