Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2742

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Land to the south of Whitnash should be kept as proposed housing development along with land around Radford Semele as designated on Plan 1.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2793

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Brownfield sites only should be used.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2834

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2873

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2902

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

I THINK YOU ARE GOING FOR EASY OPTIONS WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE IMPACT ON THE COMMUNITIES THAT EXIST THERE ALREADY.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2907

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

YOU'VE GONE FOR EASY OPTIONS AND OVERESTIMATED NEED

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2929

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

This council believes that Hatton Park, Bagington and Burton Green should be included to assist in spreading the load of development over a wider area and also in the case of Hatton Park to significantly increase viability, vitality and sustainability of that settlement, especially when it already benefits from good communication infrastructure in terms of access to the motorway network and Warwick Parkway railway station.

Furthermore consideration and provision should be made for potential use of Bagington airport should that site become available - NB: Source of minerals and development?

Sylw

ID sylw: 2964

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Jason Marvelly

A potential area for the location of new housing is the area of land in Kenilworth at the back of the houses at Rounds Hill. I know this is green belt land currently but there are no businesses, current houses or sports clubs that would have to be displaced to make way for new housing.The land is either being used for farming or is lying dormant. There could be possible access to a housing development off Rouncil Lane from the road that currently leads to the houses that were built on the old hunt kennels site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2980

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Strongly disagree

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3016

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon

This is far too high a number of dwellings to place in this particular locality because of the huge increase it will generate of vehicular traffic and the affect this will have on the main thoroughfares in the locality and to and from Coventry and adjoining towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3034

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rhyan Barry

Empty shops and houses should be populated before new buildings are erected. The council should introduce legislation not allowing properties to be empty for over 12 months without a viable reason. The council should be in negotiation with the owners of these properties and introduce them to the people that are going to habitat the new buildings that are proposed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3084

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Land at Coventry airport could be identified for use now that the commercial passenger flights have been stopped by Warwick DC planning policy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3122

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman

The local infrastructure cannot support such large areas of development. Schools and roads are already beyond capacity.
I strongly disagree that areas of large areas of green belt are developed when there are numerous sites earmarked for employment land that have not been used in excess of 10 years.
Since land in the district is in short supply perhaps more consideration could be given to the type of housing identified, taking a smaller footprint.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3125

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman

The council has not identified all resonable options for locations of new housing. There are many smaller sites within the district that could be utilised for development rather than choosing large areas of green belt - thats the 'lazy' option.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3149

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Hatton Park, Bagington and Burton Green should be included to assist in spreading the load of development over a wider area and also in the case of Hatton Park to significantly increase viability, vitality and sustainability of that settlement, especially when it already benefits from good communication infrastructure in terms of access to the motorway network and Warwick Parkway railway station.

Furthermore consideration and provision should be made for potential use of Bagington airport should that site become available - NB: Source of minerals and development?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3160

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

Not to take place on green fields sites

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3204

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw

Why build more??? not needed

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3205

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3226

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore

I do not agree with the figures imposed on this area from central government. also I do not think that we should be used as an overspill area for building in coventry. Therefore I do not think the process is democratic

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3228

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore

Do not agree with the figures imposed on us by central government

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3268

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

No need for anymore housing south of Leamington and Warwick.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3310

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Caroline Martin

Support

Sylw

ID sylw: 3319

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Munday

New housing should be located at Warwick Gates

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3345

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Gill Barker

Family homes taken off market for student accommodation

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3356

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3396

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3430

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs J Morby

Housing not needed. Houses in Barford and former Pottertons site empty a year after completion

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3443

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian F Starkey

New housing needs to be more evenly spread across whole district including villages to reduce impact on existing communities

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3449

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

The old library and museum.
Unoccupied properties in Warwick and Leamington Spa about 2500, such as old Potterton's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3480

Derbyniwyd: 04/08/2009

Ymatebydd: W R Bethall

It would seem that the Council has already discussed and approved the areas and timing of development without any previous public participation and now we are left either agreeing or disagreeing with the Council. Was consideration given to the allotments to the rear of Northumberland Road and which other areas were considered? Why is Finham shown as only being needed in the longer term?