Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3934

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3949

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

I agree that a full and exhaustive analysis of al housing options has been undertaken

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3971

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Kim Matthews

More effort should be made in identifying brown field sites - eg adjacent to the recycling facility at Pipers Lane, Kenilworth.

The area between Leek Wooton and Kenilworth shoudl be given further consideration.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3980

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

Housing allocation should be distributed around the district, not placed in one are ie south leamington/whitnash. It seems OK that we don't build on green areas in Nrth Leamington but it's OK in the south. If the houisng is distributed around the district it would lessen the impact on the infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4044

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I object to the 3,250 houses being proposed to the south of Coventry. It is not suprising that few objections to this were raised in previous consultations as this was with Warwickshire residents. Most of the dissatisfaction with this proposal are likely to come from Finham residents. I feel that all urban sites for housing should be used first before loss of any GB.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4101

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Woodhouse

All the development around kenilworth is clustered together, almost linking to the finham development, this will certainly have a huge negative impact on kenilworth, this goes against the vision of warwick council.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4132

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A D Fryer

Do not need expensive housing when there are brownfield sites at Peugeot plant and Baginton Airport.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4136

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andy Robb

You have not included land on the old North Leamington School Site or land at Coventry Airport.
There has been no discussion on the availability of the Peugeot site with Rugby DC. Why not?

Review of the SHLAA earlier this year, was at the request of Gallaghers who have purchase rights of the land you have selected as your preferred option.

Your original consultation identified preferred options for development to the south of Coventry and along the A46 corridor. These preferences are now being ignored. Is this at the request of Gallaghers and why?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4151

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss C E Hattersley

New houses that need to be built should be at Finham along area near Burton Green. Would be of benefit to students by providing housing closer to University freeing up hosuing in Leamington. Inappropriate to release land at Finham for Coventry.
Consider Hatton Park and other small pockets of land to spread impact.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4166

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Heigl

Look again at regeneration prospects in towns to bring forward brown field sites.
Why decision made not to build new settlement below A46/J15 interchange where direct road links available. Why not disperse houses over whole district. Preferred option is not public's from initial consultation so why ignored that view.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4171

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A J Bryan

Stop encroachment of Coventry and change of character in Kenilworth

Sylw

ID sylw: 4175

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire Rural Community Council

WRCC notes the acknowledgment that there are "issues around the long term sustainability of village communities and services that additional housing directed to villages through the Core Strategy could help to address" but is concerned that because of potential conlficts this has been put into abeyance. A better move would be a total commitment to identifying needs and sites throughout the rural areas in the District through funding for a rural housing enabler.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4198

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Connie Reid

Object to Kings Hill site:
Plenty of sites in built up areas

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4199

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

There are additional areas that could be considered e.g. Baginton Airport, North of Leamington, Cubbington, Kenilworth, North Warwick and West Warwick. The land at Finham should be used as to meet Warwick District's needs and not those of Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4222

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Rev. J.G. Lister

There are brown field sites around area with demise of industries and houses in lamentable state - regenerate them and use for housing rather than putting up more industrial untis, office blocks and retail parks.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4253

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

There are additional areas that need to be considered for development first e.g. Baginton Airport, North of Leamington, Cubbington, Kenilworth, North Warwick and West Warwick. The land at Finham should be used as to meet Warwick District's needs and not those of Coventry. The south of the district is already overdeveloped

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4294

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Miles

Object to Kings Hill site:
Look for brown field sites instead
Challenge number of homes required

Sylw

ID sylw: 4303

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Wade

Object to Kings Hill site:
Vacant houses in city boarded up.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4320

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor E Wood

Stated South Leamington is desirable place to live and not wanting people to trave lacross town so purchase Coventry Airport and no-one would have to travel across town. Council should be pro active in this respect.
Suggest:
Employ small committee of general public to work with WDC to look at opportunities for development if needed..
Buy Coventry Airport
Develop town centre properties rather than make a ghost town of closed shops and expensive parking.
Develop Old Town
Develop Althorpe Street
Develop Flavels and surrounding area
Suggest financially driven and not for any other purpose

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4324

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter and Olive Kerr

High concentration of housing on one area leading to imbalance in population growth for the area detrimental to future identity of locality.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4325

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

Object to putting 4200 homes in one area south of Leamington.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4344

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Clive Letchford

Focus more on regeneration of urban centres and development of brown field sites

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4353

Derbyniwyd: 25/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Dominic Simpson

Development should be at Finham for Warwick District, not Coventry.
Additional development at University for halls of residence would free up family homes and reduce student commuting.
Villages should be allowed small developments in keeping, retaining identity and maintaining sense of community.
Massive loss of industry resulted in brown field sites that should be developed first.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4369

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Kirby

Extensive area to north of Kenilworth with easy access to A45, A46 and feeder routes which will be annexed by Coventry if not exploited.
Many infill and brown field sites in urban areas to be utilised before embarking on irreversible urban sprawl. Judicious use of existing pockets of fallow sites could meet housing requirement for next 15 years by which time more redundant sites will become available.
Accelerating demographic change in social structure will require fewer modest sized family homes and greater need for compact units for single and double occupancy. Should be located within walking distance shops, health facilities etc.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4371

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A Picken

Support

Sylw

ID sylw: 4385

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Daniel & Elizabeth Sheethan

Suggest:
Over 20 villages could include small scale developments growing in traditional, sustanable, organic fashion
Build on brownfield sites (Peugeot site) as alternative to Finham which seems to have yielded to Coventry

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4395

Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

More effort should be put into finding alternatives - brown field or lower agricultural quality.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4398

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrew, Julie, Eleanor, Henry Day

Disperse development throughout district. Look again at regeneration opportunities within the towns for the bulk of housing needed and villages can take some receiving the benefit of fresh investment in local amenties

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4409

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Should seek to build on brownfield sites.
Audit commission has urged refurbishment of empty/derelict housing - how many in Warwick District? If upgraded, what would impact on housing figures be?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4419

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: G M Langston

Object to plan 5 Warwick Leamington and Whitnash
Lack of robustness during planning process - infrastructure, traffic congestion.
No explanation of proposed demographic - Whitnash schools unable to accommodate more children.
Quantative assessments of traffic density undertaken when schools were on holiday - asked to defer this until normal term time - has this been done?
Any informal response to question as to whether sewage treatment works at Longbridge could cope with extra demand?
Associated strategy to develop new business requested - is such a strategy live and financed and how do two strategies dovetail?
Justification for Plan 5 surfacing as preferred option after first consultation?
Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict outdated or sub-standard factory/business units. Why are such opportunities not being adopted?