BASE HEADER

Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 211 i 240 o 2127

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4432

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Johnson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Alternatives:
Public opinion at previous consultation was that Finham was most popular area for new housing - Coventry's infrastructure better.
On campus housing for students would free housing in Leamington.
Brown field development - sites still unused - Peugeot plant at Ryton.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4464

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mick & Sandra Coulson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Build small building projects in most villages for benefit of growing families who wish to stay in village where they were brought up. Small increase would not have such disasterous effect.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4468

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Norris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Coventry City Council could find brown field sites within boundary if pushed.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4475

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Hazel Hier

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Do not sell to Coventry for their overspill and avoid devastating the green belt.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4479

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Brian Hier

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Brown field should be developed first and needs careful monitoring to ensure that full capacity is achieved before green belt land considered

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4493

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Declan Mee

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of greenbelt land when it has not been demonstrated that all available brown field sites have been used.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4504

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E R Matthews

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Likely to be more developable land available at Coventry Airport, former Peugeot factory, North Leamington School, other land and redundant factories and areas more accessible to proposed Kenilworth station.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4511

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A K McArthur

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to Plan 5:
Lack of robustness during planning process. Infrastructure - allowing developers to implement reasonable infrastructure' appeared to prevail.
Inability to explain probable community demographic to allow for infrastructure requirements to be calculated.
Traffic density assessments were carried out during school holidays - requested deferral until term time. Was this implemented?
Capacity of Longbridge sewage treatment works to cope with increase?
Is there associated strategy for new businesses?
Why does preferred option not reflect public view through earlier consultation?
Suggest:
Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict, outdated or sub-standard factory/business units - why such opportunities not being adopted?

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4514

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A K McArthur

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Much of Grand Union corridor contains derelict, outdated or sub-standard factory/business units - why such opportunities not being adopted?

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4530

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4538

Derbyniwyd: 19/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to concentrating proposed housing sites to south of Warwick and Leamington.
Infrastructure: pressure on schools, hospitals, utility services. Europa Way and Myton Road extremely congested at peak times. Traffic modelling took place during school holiday period when traffic low. Parking at Leamington station limited and not planned to expand. Flooding of homes from field run-off which will be exacerbated by more houses.
Object to reasons for new build in this area - availablility of land and willingness of developers.
Those responsible for planning have duty of care to preserve quality of life for existing as well as future residents.
Any distinction between two towns will be lost.
Why is current area of restraint one of the first rather than one of the last to be developed?
Land is becoming available at Coventry airport and North Leamington School and seems logical to include these so that the burden is spread.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4542

Derbyniwyd: 19/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Land is becoming available at Coventry airport and North Leamington School and seems logical to include these so that the burden is spread.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4569

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Lomax

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Finham residents enjoy being on edge of countryside - brown field sites should be developed first before eating into precious green belt.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4593

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4614

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Verrier

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Development should not be concentrated in area with so much new development.
New houses should be at Finham which would benefit students and free up significant number of houses in Leamington. Should not be releasing land to Coventry but develop for Warwick. Coventry would still have economic benefits of having district residents using their facilities.
Consider developing small housing devt. at Hatton Park and put other housing around small pockets of land to spread impact.
New home building should be on brownfield sites as a priority.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4643

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: P M Slater

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Plenty of run down brown field sites in Coventry which could be developed first. Why ruin green belt when there are dilapidated areas in the city?

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4655

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Rock

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hope powers that be look for brown field site. Coventry has many areas where rejuvenation is badly needed.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4667

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Greenbelt land should be avoided.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4683

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jennifer Miremadi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Many other locations within Leamington that should be considered for building and large scale developments should be located close to Coventry to take advantage of amenities and employment opportunities.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4699

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Pritchard

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Don't want to leave the Coventry but job propects are poor and others are moving away. Houses not therefore required.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4703

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: S Bradley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to 8100 council dwellings on doorstep. Property value has already dropped due to economic climate. Hoping for increased value after recession but values of all property will drop if this goes ahead.
More havoc on roads, more traffic, more noise, more pollution.
Council tax will increase and is already extortionate.
Schools cannot cope with increased population and Brittain Lane cannot cope with more schools, roads and houses.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4738

Derbyniwyd: 05/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss M S Saben

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Areas better suited near to public transport facilities e.g. Warwick Parkway

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4743

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: V J Evans

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to Kings Hill site:
Mistake to put all development in one area. Will change character of that part of the town. Development should be spread more equally around the town. This would help the existing infrastructure to absorb new developments.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4748

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Whidborne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Suggest 'Sunset villages' relevant to housing programme in district.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4755

Derbyniwyd: 02/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Bob Dhillon and family

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to building houses south of Warwick:
Why not buillding on brown field before green field?

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4768

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr L Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Essential green belt is maintained. Natural habitat for wildlife. Green areas, wood and forests are lungs of the planet and destruction would add to climate change not reduce it as cannot dictate to people where they will work - where are jobs anyway?
Schools and transport will have to be considered. Demand increased by more houses. Level of traffic along Stoneleigh Road, A45 and A46 at peak times is immense - further traffic add to chaos. Cannot see how introduction of roads into new development will ease situation, as will ultimately flow into existing.
Do not need to build more houses for increased immigration when there is lost generation of school leavers not earning or learning new skills.
Should be training young people new skills for jobs that will be available at end of recession. Birth rates rising and life expectancy increasing but this may reverse.
Affordable housing will increase in value, will government then expect new affordable housing to be built? Too many people dealing with debt, repossession of property and loss of jobs. The answer is not to build more houses especially not on the green belt.
With loss of passenger flights and extension of runway at Birmingham airport, surely Coventry no longer needs an airport and has motorway network and major trunk roads nearby and is brown field.
Land available at North Leamington Community School is not in Core Strategy, but should be considered for Coventry overspill. Where overspill not able to be accommodated to the south of Coventry, it should be directed to nearest urban area - this means development on the edge of Kenilworth and possibly some on north side of Leamington and Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4778

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs Hunt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to 8100 new houses in Warwick District:
Already suffered adversely from significant housing developments in recent years, exerting pressure on services and infrastructure.
No plan for infrastructure in terms of drainage, sewage, roads, public transport, schools, hospitals, maintaining towns individual identities and preservation of wildlife. No new schools built, hence overpopulated existing schools. Hospitals do not have capacity to serve increased population.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4798

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Dr Martin Le Tocq

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Adding further 25,000 population over next ten years can only have further adverse impact on living environment.
10,800 new homes imposed and no attempt made to resist.
Much demand from outward migration from nearby conurbations where many new residents will contine to work further burdening transport infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4807

Derbyniwyd: 18/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Ian Frost

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No I believe the area around the airport should be looked at because there will be employment growth on the site of the former Peugeot plant.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4817

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nigel Warden

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Vast amounts of brown field land in Coventry which should be decontaminated and developed for housing or industrial use where utilities and infrastructure more readily to hand.