BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1501
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr J.C. Marlow
Proposal to build homes between Tachbrook and Leamington is a kick in the teeth for residents. It will increase light pollution making stars less visible. I chose to live in a village not a light polluted urban jungle. Once the green belt is lost it will be lost forever. Proposal will increase antisocial behaviour as young people will move ever closer to the village.
Brownfield sites should be used or smaller areas of land to the north and east of Leamington.
If this development goes ahead it will be difficult to sell properties and house prices will go down.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1513
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton
More housing on brownfield sites within Leamington- the ford founday site could take far more housing it is 45 acres in size?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1597
Derbyniwyd: 30/08/2009
Ymatebydd: EUNICE NICOLSON
No
King's Hill is NOT a 'reasonable' option
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1605
Derbyniwyd: 04/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Jim and Jennifer Lord
Sites such as baginton airfield would be better. Increasing the size of existing villages is difficult unless there is adequate infrastructure.
An over provision for future commecial developments - some should be reallocated for housing use.
Future needs of Bishops Tachbrook should be limited to satisfy requirements of the old and the young only.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1611
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr G A Cox
The option to spread small scale development across the 22 villages which could provide a significant number of homes to meet future needs has not been considered This would reduce the impact on traffic, schools and support services.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1617
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrew Cowden
Housing survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook of 500 of the 750 households concluded 15 homes were needed not 4,200.
Houses should be developed south of Finham as local people said in previous consultations.
Brownfield sites should developed first, e.g. Coventry Airport, Arches Leamignton Spa, Ryton.
Develop 10 to 20 houses in each of the 22 villages in the District every 5 - 8 years.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1621
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Stuart Sullivan
Why the old Peugeot site, now demolished, adjacent to the A45 between Ryton and Coventry Airpost, has not been considered for development within this process? The land is brownfield, adjacent to convenient link roads, within Warwickshire and nearer to its infastructure (Ryton is served by Warwickshire County Council). Such development would undoubtedly cause less irreversible environmental damage, indeed it could benefit the local environment, with inclusion of green spaces in any new development. Could the land value, and the benefits to Coventry and Warwickshire, financially, be less for such a site, rendering it less [financially] attractive?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1625
Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Richard Hatton
Warwick University was encouraged to build more halls of residences these homes would be free for local residents.
Finham land should be reserved for WDC allocation not Coventry.
Housing market is already in a depressed state, building of more homes is only going to leave more functional homes empty.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1630
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: William Bethell
No. No. No. Just read the above regarding your (developers') choices.
NOTE
At a recent meeting at Guy's Hall, Warwick School, the Council Leader stated that these were "developers options." So what hope of an unbiased and democratic approach to future population growth and protection of existing standards of quality of life.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1637
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Roy & Maria Hirons
It would be better to build more halls of residence at Warwick University which would free up about 1000 houses in Leamington currently used for student accomodation. I understand there are a number of brown field sites that could be developed for housing to space green spaces.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1643
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Vanessa Hickerton
Consider the Whitnash community and look again at the options for building houses.
Seems easy to build on countryside yet there are so many empty buildings left unused. Only 75 on Fords but 200 next to Campion School and thousands in Whitnash. Queensway, Station Approach and the Peugeot site.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1656
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Elizabeth and Daniel Sheehan
Nifer y bobl: 2
Over 20 villages in the Warwick District could be included in small scale developments growing in a traditional, sustainable, organic fashion.
Build on brownfield sites, e.g. the ex Peugeot site. This could be an alternative to the Finham site.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1683
Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009
Ymatebydd: J.G Whetstone
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1731
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D zacaroni
Object
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1760
Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Max Bacon
There are several alternative sites that could and should be utilised:
Finham
Baginton
Thickthorn
North West Warwick
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1819
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1846
Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham
As before need traffic impact survey etc. More traffic will worsen the air quality in the area,
Schools and health services in the area will be unable to cope with the number of new residents. 4200 residents, with, on average, 4 people in each, will mean an extra 17000 residents.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1909
Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Miss K A Hattersley
New homes should be built within the district boundary at Finham and Burton Green. It is inappropriate to release land at Finham for Coventry's building requirements.
It is more appropriate to develop housing at Hatton Park and around other small pockets of land to spread the impact.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1919
Derbyniwyd: 14/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Cederic Box
Object - proposed housing should be located at alternative sites such as Finham, which was the preferred location of local people when asked in 2007/008.
There are at least 1000 houses in Leamington used for student accommodation. Students should be accommodated at Warwick University thus freeing up the properties, thereby requiring fewer houses to be built. Resutl: Less travel, less pollution.
Development could be spread around 22 villages in District - 10 to 15 houses every 1 years or so, so that by 2026 a significant number would be built.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1935
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson
We do not want or can support 8000 new homes.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1978
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Ken Hope
(10.a) I can see no mention of developing more houses in the area off the Birmingham Raod from Warwick where the hospitals were (Hatton). The infrastructure particularly for transport is excellent in this area. I understood that space had been left for expansion here.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1990
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: K A Ferguson
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodatehousing needs over the next 18 years.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2004
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A. J Daubnley
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses
proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of
life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18
years.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2015
Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009
Ymatebydd: The Occupier
On the recent Housing Needs Survey conducted in Bishops Tachbrook demonstrated that the village requires only 15 new homes. Object to the 4200 houses
proposed between Bishops Tachbrook and Warwick Gates would threaten the village's character and identity as a separate settlement, and reduce the quality of
life for the communtiy here and in Whitnash and on Warwick Gates. Housing should be located around the District to accommodat housing needs over the next 18
years.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2025
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: G Pritchard
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2054
Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009
Ymatebydd: mr john jacques
because it is based on biased unproven numbers provided by New Labour to suit own ends in getting relected, to get votes from mass of welfare dependent unemployed/unemployable hangers-on it has created in 11 years of mismanagement.
no because it has not consulted nor listened to views of local people affected.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2106
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J Wenzel
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2114
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: B & N Blackham and Ellis
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in
the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2122
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: The Occupier
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2131
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: S P Jones
We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in
the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.