BASE HEADER

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Infrastructure?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 112

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2059

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mr john jacques

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no - more research and consultation needed

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2077

Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Kerr

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The conclusion seems sensible and allows for adaptation in the light of changing circumstances.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2294

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is quite clear that without a new schools building programme in the proposed development area, getting children to and from school would add a further great increase in traffic congestion.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2409

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2447

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2497

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2564

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

KENILWORTH - Warwick Road through Kenilworth town centre is a very busy road (A452). Birches Lane/Glasshouse Lane is already a bottleneck during peak times. The addition of 800 houses (c.1200 additional cars) would be totally unsupportable and environmentally damaging.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2642

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2692

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Keeping to 60% brownfield highly desirable.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2757

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As long as developers contribute to the costs of providing more facilities.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2801

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2845

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2884

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2944

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Infrastructure information was needed to make a properly informed decision on options.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2957

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Golf Club

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Concern is for increased traffic use of Crewe lane, that is sub satandard in width and alignment. In absence of infrastructure plans to cope with the proposed Thickthorn development it is not possible to assess the implications of the prposed option. An infrastructure plan will therefore be needed that is exposed to public scrutiny.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2958

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Andrews

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

1) Kenilworth's current Secondary School is large.
2) A further large development in Kenilworth without a clearly defined plan for Secondary Schooling in the area is not acceptable.
3) An enlargement of the current school would result a single school of such size as to be out of charachter with a town of its size.

Any development in Kenilworth should be conditional on suitable and appropriate growth in the provision of secondary education which reflects the towns character. This would ideally be achieved by having 2 Secondary Schools in Kenilworth of similar rather than the provision of 1 monster-sized secondary school.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2995

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Cannot/ will not maintain existing highways let alone develop a new ones - someone needs to view existing traffic problems in Green Lane plus its tributaries - absolute chaos at (schools ) (2) start and finish

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3099

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3178

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3179

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Infrastructure information was needed to make a properly informed decision on options.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3283

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I support it.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3332

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

upport

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3374

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

You need to consider the 2500 dwellings around a new railway station like somewhere Kenilworth, Milverton or Harbury, but with enough new train capacity to cope with demand.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3406

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Would developers pass the CIL to the cost of the building/house?

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3485

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Kings Hill Lane should not be considered by Warwick as part of the Coventry allocation which is too large.
The roads area congested at present and to create new roads would destroy the environment.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3607

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sport England

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

subject to having robust evidence

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3677

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

King's Hill/Green Lane/A45 -roads inadequate.

Developments should be around railway stations/ links.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3714

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I can hardly support a plan for infrastructure that hasn't been published!

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3751

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3910

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

"will prepare an infrastructure delivery plan alongside the draft Core Strategy to show what is required and how and when it will be delivered."

The above is your preferred option - why?
This is saying 'we will define the infrastructure after the core strategy' Yet you CANNOT define your core strategy WITHOUT the infrastructure plan being there first.

How were you able to confidently produce a 'preferred option' without knowing in detail the infrastructure plan?
This is completely unworkable - this must be reviewed and must follow best practice guidelines from PAS and CABE.