Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3965

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

I think the Council has to keep a very close eye on how the CIL approach is developing. I think an option that watches how the approach develops and feeds in needs to whatever structure evolves as they are identified is the best way forward

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3991

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

The infrastructure plan needs to be developed hand in hand with the core strategy. not as an after thought.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4087

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4141

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andy Robb

Your preferred option is to develop an infrastructure plan. How can this be. You should have already developed a plan to provide the evidence for your preferred option. How can you dump 4000 houses onto land when you haven't properly considered its viability or how you will service it?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4152

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Woodland Trust

We would like to see this section of the Core Strategy include proper emphasis on green infrastructure as well as the 'grey' infrastructure usually considered.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4201

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

The existing infrastructure should be used throughout the district evenly, by developing throughout the district. The current proposal for development is ill-thought out as it does not consider the current state of schools, roads etc.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4269

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

Infrastructure i.e. water, roads and schools etc. are already overstretched in Whitnash, South Leamington, South Warwick, Heathcote & Bishops Tachbrook. This has not been considered in the proposed development within the core strategy.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4443

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4616

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4714

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4836

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Object.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4881

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke

No IDF has been provided

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4972

Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison

NO - The options are not confined to how contributions will be sought. There are also options (or should be) about what infrastructure will be needed especially in relation to the new development areas. Without the infrastructure Delivery Plan, it is impossible to reach a reasoned response to any of the proposed development areas and THIS IS A MAJOR WEAKNESS OF THE PREFERRED OPTION CONSULTATION.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5059

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Morris

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5155

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5254

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood

object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5292

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: J. N. Price

As noted in clause 11.13, there will need to be an on-going process to identify the necessary
improvements of infrastructure in line with the actual site developments in the district.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5352

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5404

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

Infrastructure should be the priority, e.g. schools, playing fields, parks, children's areas etc. A road is also necessary to join the A46 with the expanded Warwick University.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5444

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Cheeseman

It is not practical to put off the infrastructure considerations and treat it as a parallel exercise. Each new Core Strategy Development must have the relevant associated infrastructure identified at the time. It may be necessary to defer the issue of funding it.

Sylw

ID sylw: 5482

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

Don't know. Preferred Option document is too vague

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5536

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Nifer y bobl: 2

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5581

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5667

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Boynton

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5713

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Warren

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5776

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip Wilson

Developers must contribute to providing green spaces/allotments and, at ratios suggested by Cllr Goode, from the beginning, not at the end - five years later. If this is not the case developers must not be given permission to build.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5859

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Pamela Payne

Gathering evidence is a bit late for Whitnash where roads, public transport and schools are already struggling.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5933

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6008

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

There is no information. How can the Council be proposing sites for development withou first determining that new infrastructure can be built or existing on can cope.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6035

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul Skidmore

Support.