BASE HEADER

Do you support or object to the preferred option for Infrastructure?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 91 i 112 o 112

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6085

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6137

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard and Judy Swallow

Nifer y bobl: 2

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6212

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6273

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ross Telford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6275

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ross Telford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6356

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Jessamine

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6453

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: graham leeke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

But no IDF has been provided!

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6482

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: David Shaddick

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Another argument is that infrastructure can be provided more efficiently on one massive development. This ignores the overloading of exisiting facilities such as road access and river crossing and Warwick Hospital.

No traffic study has been done, and no proposals yet exist as to the provision of facilities for healthcare, education or recreation.


As Warwick Gates has shown, a large scale development gives rise to increased traffic, exacerbated by the lack of school and other facilities.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6560

Derbyniwyd: 03/11/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anita Coldman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is alreay traffic congestion along Glasshouse/Birches Lane. Access to new development should not be located off Glasshouse /Birches Lane as it would cause accidents and be dangerous for children and cyclists.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6573

Derbyniwyd: 03/11/2009

Ymatebydd: Simon Wood

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Concerned about existing water supply will cope with new housing to the south of Leamington Spa.
Concerned that brownfield sites should be used first and that if greenfield sites are required, the development should be small scale so that it does place undue pressure on existing infrastructure.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6737

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 6954

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is insufficient detail in this Preferred Options Paper for us to consider it as a „Preferred Option‟ so we object.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7010

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Supported providing the money is ring fenced and not as in other cases, leaked off by Government or Local/regional authorities, either directly or by reducing grants. A tax by any other name?

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7153

Derbyniwyd: 11/11/2009

Ymatebydd: Don Anderson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Concern that the rate of growth will have a detrimental impact on infrastructure particularly schools.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7393

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Europa Way Consortium

Asiant : Entec UK Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Consortium supports the development of an infrastructure delivery plan but would not want to see the delivery of Phase 1 strategic sites inhibited whilst this is being prepared.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7436

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management & William Davies Ltd

Asiant : Stoneleigh Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It would have been helpful at this stage in the consultations on the strategy if the broad infrastructure requirements for the development of the strategic sites (and the alternatives to them) were outlined to enable comparisons to be made and assessments about delivery and developability.

The Draft Core Strategy must embrace these principles and show how the choices relate to the specific infrastructure requirements (and costs) for sites.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7583

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr George Jones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7649

Derbyniwyd: 14/12/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Boyle

Asiant : Brown and Co

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Provided it adequately supports, reflects need, the correct sites and economic viability.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 7727

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ray Bullen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is insufficient detail in the Preferred Options Paper for consideration. However, it is poor planning policy to expand residential of the district by 20% without simultaneously including the infrastructure needs, properly thought through as to level of requirements and integrating it with the residential development so that it happens and is available when occupation begins.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 33625

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]

Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Reserve the right to comment when further details/proposals are made available.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 33681

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr T Steele

Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 33767

Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Shirley Estates

Asiant : Davis Planning Partnership

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support