BASE HEADER
Do you support or object to the preferred option for Infrastructure?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6085
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Skidmore
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6137
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Richard and Judy Swallow
Nifer y bobl: 2
Object
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6212
Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009
Ymatebydd: John, Elaine and Sarah Lewis
Object
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6273
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Ross Telford
support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6275
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Ross Telford
support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6356
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: John Jessamine
Object.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6453
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: graham leeke
But no IDF has been provided!
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6482
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: David Shaddick
Another argument is that infrastructure can be provided more efficiently on one massive development. This ignores the overloading of exisiting facilities such as road access and river crossing and Warwick Hospital.
No traffic study has been done, and no proposals yet exist as to the provision of facilities for healthcare, education or recreation.
As Warwick Gates has shown, a large scale development gives rise to increased traffic, exacerbated by the lack of school and other facilities.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6560
Derbyniwyd: 03/11/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Anita Coldman
There is alreay traffic congestion along Glasshouse/Birches Lane. Access to new development should not be located off Glasshouse /Birches Lane as it would cause accidents and be dangerous for children and cyclists.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6573
Derbyniwyd: 03/11/2009
Ymatebydd: Simon Wood
Concerned about existing water supply will cope with new housing to the south of Leamington Spa.
Concerned that brownfield sites should be used first and that if greenfield sites are required, the development should be small scale so that it does place undue pressure on existing infrastructure.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6737
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Milverton New Allotments Association Ltd
support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 6954
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Bishops Tachbrook Parish Council
There is insufficient detail in this Preferred Options Paper for us to consider it as a „Preferred Option‟ so we object.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7010
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Norton Lindsey Parish Council
Supported providing the money is ring fenced and not as in other cases, leaked off by Government or Local/regional authorities, either directly or by reducing grants. A tax by any other name?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7153
Derbyniwyd: 11/11/2009
Ymatebydd: Don Anderson
Concern that the rate of growth will have a detrimental impact on infrastructure particularly schools.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7393
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Europa Way Consortium
Asiant : Entec UK Ltd
The Consortium supports the development of an infrastructure delivery plan but would not want to see the delivery of Phase 1 strategic sites inhibited whilst this is being prepared.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7436
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management & William Davies Ltd
Asiant : Stoneleigh Planning
It would have been helpful at this stage in the consultations on the strategy if the broad infrastructure requirements for the development of the strategic sites (and the alternatives to them) were outlined to enable comparisons to be made and assessments about delivery and developability.
The Draft Core Strategy must embrace these principles and show how the choices relate to the specific infrastructure requirements (and costs) for sites.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7583
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr George Jones
Object
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7649
Derbyniwyd: 14/12/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Boyle
Asiant : Brown and Co
Provided it adequately supports, reflects need, the correct sites and economic viability.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 7727
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Ray Bullen
There is insufficient detail in the Preferred Options Paper for consideration. However, it is poor planning policy to expand residential of the district by 20% without simultaneously including the infrastructure needs, properly thought through as to level of requirements and integrating it with the residential development so that it happens and is available when occupation begins.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33625
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Warwickshire County Council [Archaeological Information and Advice]
Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd
Reserve the right to comment when further details/proposals are made available.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33681
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr T Steele
Asiant : Savills (L&P) Ltd
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33767
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Shirley Estates
Asiant : Davis Planning Partnership
Support