BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Natural Environment?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3006
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill
Leave nature alone before this planet is destroyed.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3018
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon
The loss of such a substantial amount of Green Belt and the closing of the gap between Coventry and Kenilworth, thus destroying the environment both for people living in Finham and Green Lane as well as people living in Kenilworth. The loss of wildlife habitat and fertile farmland.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3109
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000
Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3127
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman
The proposed option is a drastic change from the current situation as there is substantial loss of the green belt to the south of Leamington and Warick around Europa Way and Bishops Tachbrook. This will not enhance the lives of current residents or visitors to the district as the area will be over developed.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3184
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: John Murphy
YES - but should be amended to reflect the more balanced spread (four towns and south of Coventry) of development which we suggest earlier in this questionnaire.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3241
Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009
Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore
If this was applied to the proposed developments in kenilworth then they would not hold up unless much thought is given to flora and fauna and how to protect it.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3295
Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers
I do not wish to see anymore houses and factories built on farm land and green belt sites.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3349
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp
The proposed housing developments represent an assault on the natural environment
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3416
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3465
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro
Failure to consider the impact of Global warming. Climate change will alter the basis for decision making
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3492
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby
Kings Hill Lane should be included in the 'preferred options' as it is a 'unique special landscape area'.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3537
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner
Warwick Gates to Bishops Tachbrook essentially rural in character which would be destroyed by building houses.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3542
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner
Green field land of high quality should not be squandered. Future generations will need land suitable for food production. Effort should be put into finding more brown field land or identifying sites of lower agricultural value
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3587
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Owen
object
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3612
Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Robin and Anne Tole
Land is green belt and productive farmland. In highly built up area is important to retain.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3614
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Sport England
The LPA should considor the role of Sport in the natural environment. The district is rich with opportunities which should be carefully managed to accommodate the wider community's interests and requirements, not just conservationists and ramblers.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3621
Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs D H Cowgill
Good agricultural land needed. South of Sydnenham site and east of Whitnash is next to Whitnash Brook Valley Nature reserve with wildlife in evidence.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3624
Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr C K Mason
Loss of farmland and habitats.Only narrow strip of green belt would divide new settlement from Bishops Tachbrook and poisitive socio economic diversity in council's vision could be lost.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3681
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay
Green belt/productive agricultural land need s to be retained. Giving it up to unnecessary developmet will damage the area in the long term.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3723
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes
No.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3747
Derbyniwyd: 13/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Alan N Gandy
Green Belt and Conservation Areas can be ridden over and no protection offered from questionable developments. Keeping significant green buffer between Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook has little value when current green buffer under attack.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3763
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3764
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3765
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3784
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Carol Pritchard
Acknowledged constraints: scheduled ancient monument, regionally important geological site, flood risk zones, undulating land, noise from A46 and railway line, impact on area of medium and high landscape value.
Kings Hill historic area with links to Stoneleigh Abbey: ancient hedgerows, diverse wildlife.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3793
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Roger Morrall
Loss of green belt, prime farming land, risk of flooding.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3798
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Veda Morrall
Loss of green belt and prime farming land with significant effect on wildlife.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3804
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Angela Murray
It will destroy farmland currently used to produce food crops.
It will destroy wildlife habitats - badger setts on Kings Hill
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3808
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Pat Weake
Loss of green belt south of Harbury Lane.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3825
Derbyniwyd: 04/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Patricia and William Smith
Serious concern over Kings Hill site:
Productive farmland
Stoneleigh and other villages in danger of losing character.
Erosion of gap between Coventry, Kenilworth and Leamington.
Bore hole at Green Lane/Gretna Road junction for water extraction - becoming increasingly valuable.
Kings Hill Lane prone to surface water and flooding
Finham sewage works adjacent with resulting smells, especially in summer.
Building would to close to long, elevated section of A46 with resulting noise and air pollution
Proximity to flight path for Coventry airport with resulting air pollution
Massive amount of buildings needed in addition to houses resulting in more loss of green belt
Could result in Coventry becoming 'supercity' through absorption of villages - Kenilworth, Bubbenhall, Stoneleigh and Baginton
Wrong to allocate green belt land to accommodate unnecessary housing.