Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4408

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Loss of land suitable for food production against govt. policy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4413

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: M I Clement

Object to Kings Hill site
Loss of green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4438

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: JD & CL Mackenzie

Object to 4,200 new homes near Harbury Lane, Europa Way and Whitnash
Loss of green belt land

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4454

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4466

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Norris

Object to site at Kings Hill
Green belt and should remain so. Primarily in agricultural use - unless soil is protected there is danger of local flooding and environmental damage caused by lack of carbon dioxide conversion.
Area contains many animal and bird species requiring our protection, not destruction of their habitat.
Surrounding area is not able to cope

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4470

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Malkit Ram

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt and devastating impact to landscape

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4474

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Hazel Hier

Object to Kings Hill site:
Fields are used for crops and livestock - valuable farming land.
Wild life will suffer - muntjacks, squirrels, rabbits, pheasants and many more will lose habitat.
Previous plans to develop site thrown out 30 years ago - Coventry, Kenilworth, Leamington and Warwick would become urban sprawl.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4485

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss P Luckett

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green area around south of city has been gradually eroded over the years, lost to Warwick University and housing and bringing traffic chaos.
Green belt important to conservation of countryside - leave some green space to enjoy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4497

Derbyniwyd: 30/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs D Matthews

Finham currently on the edge of countryside alongside the green belt, with its wildlife and farm land. The gap between Coventry and Kenilworth would be significantly reduced. Farmers would lose their livelihood.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4561

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4622

Derbyniwyd: 30/09/2009

Ymatebydd: MR Dan Saxton

Green belt land benefits people - leisure, habitats, cleaner air and water, better use of land bordering cities.
Precedent - allowing green belt land to be developed will allow similar decisions to be made regarding other green belt sites.
Environment - When world focussed on saving precious resources WDC or Coventry destroying not maintaining.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4631

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4673

Derbyniwyd: 01/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs C Gribbon

Object to housing figure and the development of land south of Warwick, concentrating most of the development into small area.
Core strategy highlights need to protect environment yet proposed area of restraint will not protect environment or community of Bishops Tachbrook.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4691

Derbyniwyd: 02/10/2009

Ymatebydd: E Holroyde

Deplorable that building planned in green belt and area of restraint established to preserve identities of settlements resulting in breach of trust between govt. and the people.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4693

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr. Prof Maurice Shutler

Will use up green belt land which should be inviolate.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4698

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Pritchard

Object to Kings Hill site:
Large amount of wildlife in area affected. Kings Hill Lane - used by people on horses, cows and horses in fields, rabbits, foxes and badgers.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4701

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Ingram

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt significantly reducing gap between Coventry and Kenilworth
Loss of valuable agricultural land when this is in short supply and should be retained for future
Poor drainage from Kings Hill leads to run-off on Kings Hill
Designated special landscape on Kings Hill
Badger population - protected species and plenty of other wildlife

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4726

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4727

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4737

Derbyniwyd: 05/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss M S Saben

Object to Kings Hill site:
Land is green belt

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4742

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: V J Evans

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4746

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Walton

Object to Kings Hill site:
Affect on wildlife and green belt reducing gap between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4760

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs John & Margaret Pyner

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt. Does not look to the future when we need green space and farming land to grow enough food. Not been clearly demonstrated that all brown field land utilised. Green space to south of city special and gives some division between Coventry and Kenilworth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4764

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt important to wildlife and farmland should be kept for food production.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4766

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Therese Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt irreplaceable and should be protected for future generations.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4767

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Therese Allister

Object to Kings Hill site:
Building here would have terrible effect on quality of life for people of Finham and Green Lane as well as severely damaging local wildlife and archaeology.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4769

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr L Morris

Essential green belt is maintained. Natural habitat for wildlife. Green areas, wood and forests are lungs of the planet and destruction would add to climate change not reduce it as cannot dictate to people where they will work.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4793

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Higgins

Contrary to alleged government directive, designated area of restraint should be respected as have been identfied for good reason.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4796

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: richard keylock

The Finham proposal fails on the below counts;
Vast areas of green belt loss, Vast areas of farmland loss, Flooding / drainage issues adjacent to Green Lane, loss of ancient hedgerows,trees ponds containing buzzards,owls,crested newts etc

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4799

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Dr Martin Le Tocq

Locally, development should be restricted to brown field and in-fill sites to preserve green belt.