Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5363

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

No detail is provided in the Core Strategy Preferred Options Paper

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5415

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

The Kings Hill proposal will damage the Natural Environment.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5455

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Cheeseman

I am assuming that recreation land referred to in §17.1 does not include thing like sports facilities. Where are they covered in the context of their "open spaces".

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5489

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

Preferred Option should acknowledge the importance of urban gardens to wildlife

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5502

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Kirkman

Environmental cost to Kings Hill - loss of farmland at a time when oil prices show volatility. Transporting food will not be an option - need to grow food close to market. Building on city fringes will reduce ability to do this. Loss of beautiful landscape for future generations - cannot be restored. Wildlife will have less space.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5506

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: V Strong

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt land and wildlife Precious little green open space inside Coventry now, taking green belt from around the city would reduce 'lungs' and diminish air quality. There are ancient hedgerows dating back to 1500 on land. Along with loss of green belt and agricultural land, there is loss of wildlife. Continuous loss of habitat is pushing too many species to extinction and the eco-balance is further upset.
Loss of farm land - food prices rising and world food crisis. Our food has to be imported , even that traditionally grown here, as production capacity per head of population is extremely low, yet we have some of the best farmland in the world. Land is built on and farmers paid minimum prices. Brown field sites can be reused but once greenbelt/farmland built on, it cannot be recovered.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5548

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Nifer y bobl: 2

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5553

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joyce Reynolds

Object to Kings Hill site:
Area well used with productive agricultural land within ancient hedgerows and mature trees. 27 ponds support variety of wildlife and there are two plant nurseries providing jobs for those who find entry into other employment too challenging.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5592

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Newell

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt land will be destroyed - objectives are: protect natural or semi natural environments; improve air quality within urban areas; ensure that urban dwellers have access to countryside with consequent educational and recreational opportunities and protect the unique character of rural communities which might otherwise be absorbed by expanding suburbs.
Green belt has many benefits: walking, camping, and biking areas close to cities and towns; habitat for wild plants, animal and wildlife; cleaner air and water; better land use of areas bordering cities.
Precedent: Allowing development or building on the green belt would allow similar decision to be made on protected green belt areas. Will be gradual but definite erosion of irreplaceable resource.
Environment: At a time when world focussed on saving precious resources, WDC or Coventry will be communicating to the world its policy on the environment is to destroy, not maintain, decreasing resources such as these.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5594

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

I strongly support retention of the green belt and indeed their selective expansion. Policies should also be linked to the UK Biodiversity Action Plan and the Countryside and Rights of Way Act

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5602

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger and Julia Graham

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt and farmland and the subsequent consequences that would bring to wildlife. We should be protecting areas of grassland and trees not destroying them. This area also provides definition between Coventry and Kenilworth which people will be sad to see disappear.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5607

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Duncan Gowing

Unacceptable to develop open land - Will irrevocably destroy protected green belt. Will wipe out county wildlife - birds, mammals including field mice, foxes, badgers and foxes. Will remove good quality farming land when there is nationally recognised shortage.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5636

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs. Zoe Rycroft

Object to
Land at Lower Heathcote Farm, south of Harbury Lane
Land South of Sydenham and east of Whitnash
Land at Woodside Farm, north of Harbury Lane
Land west of Europa Way, Warwick
Remaining agricultural land should be preserved to feed future generations.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5677

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Boynton

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5727

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Warren

Protecting the natural environment is surely the most important priority.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5787

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip Wilson

Allotments across the district are home to diverse groups of flora and fauna along with providing a habitat for a great variety of birds, animals and reptiles including the protected Great Crested Newt and the national rarity Warwickshire Drooper Plum. May I once again remind WDC of the massive importance in maintaining green belt land between Leamington, Warwick and Kenilworth and I support the decision to remove it from the Options for Growth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5828

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5866

Derbyniwyd: 13/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Pamela Payne

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5944

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

But should include villages.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5963

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nicholas Solman

Object to Kings Hill site:
Kings Hill is spot of real natural beauty that cannot be ignored - don't take that away.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5970

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lisa Hartill

Object to sites south of Warwick, Leamington and Whitnash:
Areas of restraint put in place when Warwick Gates was built to protect area from over development. Situation hasn't changed, Whitnash still needs protecting. Why are these areas to be developed first and not last?
No consideration to maintaining individuality of Warwick and Leamington or Warwick and Whitnash. What about maintaining the green field areas between Leamington and Bishops Tachbrook? Will Bishops Tachbrook eventually merge with Leamington post 2026?
At Woodside Farm, houses were proposed but refused in 2007 due to the quality of agricultural land - can this now be ignored?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6013

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

How can you defend maintaing these designated rural areas, but at the same time modify some of the boundaries to fit the current plan.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6046

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6094

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Skidmore

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6102

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Graham and Gail Clews

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt - shortage in Coventry and should be kept as it is for as long as possible.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6109

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Alan John Trinder

Object to Kings Hill site:
Grave reservations about loss of green belt.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6116

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Stephen Trinder

Object to Kings Hill site:
This would irreparably damage lovely countryside that provides green lung for city and would lead to merging of Coventry and Kenilworth.
Do not believe it to be in the best interests of people of Warwickshire and Coventry for the green belt to be obliterated.
Green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth will be reduced to a few hundred yards in places.
Great pressure put on wildlife haven of Wainbody Wood and designed local Nature Reserve and part of diminishing ancient woodland - flytipping and motorcycle riding through the wood, vandalism and criminal damage. This wood is one of Coventry's finest natural assets and despite any buffer zone around the wood, it is likely grave damage would be caused.
Would cause destruction of special landscape quality.
Would boost damaging proposals for southern relief road on attractive and arable land. Noise would be considerable.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6122

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: N G Fletcher

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt land should be protected at all costs and so called brown sites should be looked at first, which does not seem to be the case.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6147

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Angela Fryer

Object to Kings Hill site:
Would create urban sprawl joining Coventry, Kenilworth and Stoneleigh. Individual character would be destroyed.
Kings Hill good farm land which will become vital resource in future. Green agenda should protect green belt and encourage local growing to cut down on transportation.This development would destroy air quality and make mockery of green policy
Strategy should uphold Warwickshire, Coventry & Solihull Biodiversity Plan.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6173

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Green

Object to Kings Hill site:
Against all environmental concerns to cover green belt land that provides a civilised buffer between towns and cities, in this case, Coventry and Kenilworth.
Not a NIMBY opinion, but genuine concern to protect attractive environment that everyone needs close to urban areas.