BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the Natural Environment?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4815
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Nigel Warden
Object to Kings Hill site.
Green belt land easy option to develop and is effectively giving developers green light if earmarked.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4818
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Nigel Warden
Green belt precious commodity and should be protected.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4844
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke
Green belt is precious and should be preserved
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4896
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke
The Tachbrook should be re-designated as a Strategic River Corridor
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4939
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Sukhjeet and Uinkar Dhillon
Object to sites in Harbury Lane and Whitnash area:
If development goes ahead there will be little or no green buffer between Warwick Gates and Bishops Tachbrook, just an urban sprawl. There is no green buffer between Warwick and Whitnash.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4944
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Lynn Morrison
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt would lead to Kenilworth eventually merging with Coventry.
Once built, farming land lost forever.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4952
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs A M Sills
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt gap between Coventry and Kenilworth
Loss of valuable agricultural land when in short supply and needed for future
Loss of school playing fields.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4957
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: H Round
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt gap between Coventry and Kenilworth
Loss of valuable agricultural land which is in short supply and will be needed in future
Designated special landscape on Kings Hill
Badger population - protected species and plenty of other wildlife
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4964
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Richard Monday
Object to Thickthorn site:
Green belt should be sacrosanct.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4969
Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Angela Murray
Object to Kings Hill site:
Will destroy farmland currently used to produce food crops
Will destroy wildlife habitats - badger setts on Kings Hill
Will destroy green gap at the perimeter of city bringing Coventry closer to Kenilworth and Stoneleigh making one urban sprawl affecting three established and separate communities.
Development would destroy attractiveness of existing area contrary to Coventry, Solihull & Warwickshire Sub Regional Economic Development Strategy 2008 - 2026.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4977
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Richard J Bennett
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt and good farming land and will destroy all wildlife.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4980
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs H Wilson
Object to Kings Hill site:
Need for farming land to grow food.
Wildlife will suffer; buzzards, badgers, foxes and birds.
Loss of green belt reduces gap between Kenilworth and Coventry.
May be other vacant land available without developing green field site and good agricultural land.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4983
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Susan Pickering
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt, farmland, pasture and wildlife. Loss of school playing fields. Impact on landscape.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4995
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs P E Hunt
Object to sites at Bishops Tachbrook/Warwick Gates:
Green belt was considered of great importance but this has no meaning now.
Removing trees, hedges and building on open spaces increases effects of global warming.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5010
Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison
Qualified YES _ Generally insufficient importance is given to conserving and enhancing the biodiversity. There appears to be no recognition of the vital role that biodiversity can play in helping urban areas to adapt to climate change, nor of the role the countryside should play in energy generation. Green infrastructure role should be acknowledged.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5014
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Misses PK and EM Kennedy
Object to sites south of Harbury Lane and
Ignoring health, wellbeing and environment of community and ecological balance of wildlife. Increased pollution, traffic problems, destruction of rural and green field sites. Loss of unique characteristics and identity of villages and areas affected by development.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5018
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Stuart Morrison
Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt and farming land would eventually lead to Kenilworth merging with Coventry.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5027
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Stella Saad
Object to 8,100 new homes in Warwick area and specifically those planned for area west of Europa Way:
Area of restraint at time of planning Warwick Technology Park as green buffer zone to separate Warwick and Leamington.
.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5035
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: FGM Butcher
Object to Thickthorn site:
Green belt and should stay as such.
Should be kept for agricultural and sports use as now.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5040
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs MH Godsmark
Object to Kings Hill site:
Will destroy farmland and wildlife and will reduce gap between Coventry and Kenilworth.
Object to development on green belt.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5077
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Keylock
The Finham proposal fails on the below counts;
Vast areas of green belt loss, Vast areas of farmland loss, Flooding / drainage issues adjacent to Green Lane, loss of ancient hedgerows,trees ponds containing buzzards,owls,crested newts etc.This area has previously already been deemed an area of natural beauty by a building inspectorate
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5079
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Dr Neville Hunt
Object to Kings Hill site:
Irreversible loss of green belt - easy option. No immediate need to build on green belt when Coventry City identified sites for around 20,000 new homes on urban or brownfield sites. Resist govt. policy and refuse to allow building on prime green belt land.
Discard proposed housing development at Kings Hill.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5150
Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs ME Shaw
Object to sites south of Warwick, Whitnash and Leamington:
Loss of valuable agricultural land at a time when it is needed to grow more food.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5170
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts
You have a good policy, but its obviously worthless as the Council is happy to amend it to meet mass development plans.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5234
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Sonia Owczarek
Absolutely not. The Council seem happy to destroy habitat and build on Green Belt. How can this be protecting the natural environment.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5251
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: MS Judith Bennett
Object to Kings Hill site:
Understanding that green belt land is protected from development to prevent towns and cities joining up and forming large conurbations. This will happen if this development goes ahead.
Beautiful view across farmland will be destroyed together with wildlife.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5263
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: RL & M Davies
Object to Kings Hill site:
Too many green spaces being replaced with new developments. Should try preserving environnmentally sensitive lands for future generations.
Consideration should be given to wildlife, ponds, trees that would be lost.
Main considerations are impact on countryside, SINC, landscape character and inpact on the amenities of neighbouring properties.
Site of Importance for Nature Conservation - Development within this area should only be permissible if it can be demonstrated that the need for development outweights the impact on the site's wildlife interest. If it does not comply with the relevant countryside policies it would therefore be unacceptable.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5269
Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood
I do not think you are controlling new development at all.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5275
Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr A Emerson
Object to Kings Hill site:
Do not wish to see green belt/farmland destroyed in favour of housing that is not required but is being forced upon us by MPs.
Do not want wildlife destroyed - badgers, deer, foxes, woodpeckers etc all at risk.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5309
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: J. N. Price
A compromise needs to be found whereby restrictions are applied to Areas of Restraint sensitively with real consideration of the real needs and impacts of individual cases.