Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3832

Derbyniwyd: 17/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip and Barbara Lennon

Council has doubled amount of green field land needed between May 08 and 09 Why? How do current and shadow MPs react to this when contrary to govt. recommendation for brown field/green field devt. proportions?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3862

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Kearey

Object to Plan 5 and Europa Way in particular: 80% of homes will be on green land.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3893

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: L M D Louise, Matthew, David Drinkhall Paul Kalus Anthony Barrett

Europa Way site was designated 'area of restraint'. Developing land would mean joining Leamington, Warwick and Whitnash. Area rich agricultural land of habitats and wildlife and high quality food production - such as that core strategy seeks to protect for sport and recreation.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3896

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S S Khera

Object to Kings Hill Site.
Loss of part of green belt

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3912

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

The wildlife will be badly lost.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3923

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

You seem very keen to continually contradict your own vision and associated strategies. You seem to forget that organisations such as CABE and PAS are providing best practice expert advice that you choose to ignore. You have tried to fit the strategy to the preferred option and not the other way around.

All the advisers suggest any LARGE placement of housing is detrimental no matter which natural environment it is built on.I suggest an independent body checks out your reasons for thinking building on some of the natural environment is appropriate.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3999

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

how can you be protecting the area by agree to develop so much open space

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4090

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I do not feel the Council has looked at the loss of wildlife habitats in area of proposed development to the south of Coventry

Sylw

ID sylw: 4105

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Huge housing developments are obviously going to go ahead. The natural environment should be preserved but much of it will be lost if all this is deemed necessary.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4129

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A D Fryer

Object to Kings Hill site.
Natural environments, including rare orchids, bats, newts, badgers, muntjacs and many more: must be saved.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4135

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs A Dobson

Object to Kings Hill site.
Green belt land which should not be built on.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4150

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss C E Hattersley

Development along Harbury Lane will spoil countryside and impact on Bishops Tachbrook.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4165

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Elizabeth Heigl

Remaining agricultural land needed to feed future generations.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4169

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: A J Bryan

Use of green belt unbelievable. Whatever the use of seeking to protect from urban sprawl is swept away by artbitary bereaucratic directive from govt? Green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth particularly sensitive - already less than half a mile. University already threatening this without new housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4195

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Connie Reid

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt
Loss of healthy countryside.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4209

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

Areas of restraint should remain. The open countryside should be retained south of Warwick, Leamington & Whitnash. Land previously marked as areas of restraint should be adhered to.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4271

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

All reasonable options have not been considered

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4278

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Johnson

Object to Kings Hill site:
Incredibly destructive. Quiet part of city with views of fields would be lost for houses that are not needed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4280

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Johnson

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt in area where there are few green spaces. Loss of wildlife and view of green fields.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4283

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lorraine J Gowing

Object to Kings Hill site:
Destroy green belt and wipe out wildlife.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4285

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M G Miles

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of green belt that is continually being encroached upon at a time we are encouraged to produce our own food.
Destruction of natural habitats of local wildlife

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4291

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Miles

Object to Kings Hill site:
Loss of greenbelt/farmland
Loss of wildlife
Loss of ancient historical sites
Loss of ancient hedgerows and woodland

Sylw

ID sylw: 4299

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heather Cooper

Object to Kings Hill site:
Destruction of green belt between Coventry and Kenilworth would be tragic and irreversible loss.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4301

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Wade

Object to Kings Hill site:
Green belt land one of the attractions to living on edge of city - walking in countryside.
Once developed, lost forever for food production, wildlife, water absorption.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4308

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne S Statham

Object to Kings Hill site:
Use of green belt land and destruction of beautiful area.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4321

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Trevor E Wood

Will not gain public support until demonstrate that all brown field areas have been examined and a robust plan in place.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4323

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter and Olive Kerr

Object to predominance of new housing in Warwick/Leamington area on greenfield sites.
Reduces agricultural land, particularly in Leamington/Warwick area and Kenilworth and potential area for Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4331

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Janette Eslick

Object that this is first area of restraint to be developed and should be last until alternative found or potential change of govt. and policies.
Concerned area around Europa Way impact on traffic, increase in flood risk on land currently acts as soakaway and is rich habitat for wildlife.
Loss of habitat - impact on woodpeckers, buzzards, bats, foxes, deer, newts and hedgehogs

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4352

Derbyniwyd: 25/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Dominic Simpson

If lower number of houses built correspondingly lower population growth contributing to area of rich heritage, green spaces and with a strong agricultural economy that has developed and diversified, not been overdeveloped and forced into diversification through lack fo space.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4392

Derbyniwyd: 26/08/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Environment - South of Warwick Gates through to Bishops Tachbrook essentially rural. Clearly this would be destroyed if development allowed, making Bishops Tachbrook a suburb of Leamington.
Green field development - iniquitous that high quality green field land should be squandered. Land needed for food production. More effort should be put into finding alternatives - brown field or lower agricultural quality.