BASE HEADER
Do you support or object to the preferred option for the Natural Environment, particularly in respect of amendments to the Area of Restraint designation?
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 98
Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr W C H Morris
The past attempt to vandalise Priory Park (stopped by a popular outcry and habitat destruction policies apparent on the Racecourse/common say more about the insesitivity of council policies than fine words in this declaration.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 243
Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood
The 'Area of Restraint' should include the Green Belt land around Coventry, and this should be protected, and not have its environment destroyed by housing.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 286
Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson
Absolutely not as this would allow development West of Europa Way and South of Sydenham.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 383
Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Peter Pounds
Object.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 459
Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke
Support.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 511
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson
Support.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 582
Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 645
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 687
Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila Smith
Weasel words again. The preferred option is to disregard the council's own strategic objective when it suits them. How can green belt development fit with the startegic objective here?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 734
Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009
Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 805
Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Faye Davis
I think further brownfield sites could be identified in order to protect greenbelt areas.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 875
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Adrian Farmer
Stop the building on green fields
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 936
Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Christine Betts
Too many new developments will ruin the rural feel of Warwick/Whitnash.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1018
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon
In complete contradiction as regards proposals for Kings Hill!!
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1040
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Kirit Marvania
Believe Kings Hill should be preserved/
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1144
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs T Robinson
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1206
Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Barry Elliman
Object
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1254
Derbyniwyd: 30/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr G.C. Allman
The proposed development will merely add to this problem and help destroy the last remaining green space in the area and any remaining rural appeal, quickly consuming the l village of Bishops Tachbrook into the ever-growing Warwick-Leamington conurbation. The plans refer to an "area of restraint" designed to avoid this. However, there is simply not enough distance between Bishops Tachbrook and Harbury Lane for this to be effective and it is merely a fudge to obtain planning permission rather than a significant effort to reduce the impact of the development.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1271
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrew Horsley
Woodside Farm was maintained as an Area of Restraint following an inquiry. This preferred option flies in the face of the findings from that inquiry. NB. Valuable agricultural land; steep elevation; poor access; adjoining recent dense development of Warwick Gates; ancient hedgerows and wildlife.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1330
Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Sarah Jane Horsley
Nothing has changed with regards to Woodside Farm so it should stay as an area of restraint. Just because Bates wants to sell for development should not mean it should be allowed . Leave us alone! We have had ENOUGH building ruining our area. Warwick Gates is more than enough.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1411
Derbyniwyd: 20/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Kevin and Sylvia Burke
Nifer y bobl: 2
We treasure the green fields between the boundary of homes and the edge of Warwick Gates. So many new houses will destroy the rural life of the area.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1496
Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Kundi
Nifer y bobl: 2
Object.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1530
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Hamilton
Protect areas of restraint, especially St Mary Lands in Warwick, which is 750 year old meadow grassland.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1581
Derbyniwyd: 31/08/2009
Ymatebydd: B.L.A.S.T.
17b We believe that the concept of keeping a green gap between towns and villages is vital and must be maintained and in fact guaranteed against future development plans
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1606
Derbyniwyd: 04/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Jim and Jennifer Lord
Even with a green buffer Bishops Tachbrook will become a suburb of Leamington. This green buffer in turn may be eroded as it may be seen as too great a temptation and BT will lose it's identity.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1618
Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrew Cowden
The Area of Restraint designation is not long enough (until 2026) and no houses should be build within this gap.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1663
Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009
Ymatebydd: William Bethell
Strongly object. What will be left to use in terms of fresh aire, fields between areas of communities, etc.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1716
Derbyniwyd: 27/08/2009
Ymatebydd: J.G Whetstone
Object.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1863
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Val Hunnisett
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 1899
Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham
Not enough information.