Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1962

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2090

Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Kerr

The existing concept of having 'Areas of Restraint' does ensure that through cocsideration is given before allowing any development to take place. In addition, if any area currently within an 'Area of Restraint' have any historical and ammenity value they should also be considered for becoming a 'Conservation Area'.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2197

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

The urban housing spread over recent years has already reduced significantly the open countryside between the towns of Warwick and Leamington and surrounding villages.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2347

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2459

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2475

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr D J Bradshaw

1D 1 E and 1C are Areas if Restraint these should not be lost as they provide a green brake between developments.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2505

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

BW would support the development of a SPD for the canal corridor in Warwick, which reconciles the multifunctional uses of the waterway.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2576

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

Would support any proposals which protect the natural environment.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2654

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2704

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

The areas of restraint are vital, especially along the river and between Leamington Spa and Radford Semele.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2769

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

As long as areas between Warwick/Leamington/Whitnash and 2 miles outside these towns are kept 'greenfield' where they currently are. I do not accept building on some greenfield areas on the edge of towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2812

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

If you over-develop this area you will spoli the natural environment. This is where your objectives are in conflict.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2856

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2895

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2949

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

More emphasis should be placed on maintaining, or even increasing, the areas of restraint.

This council particularly objects to the invasion of the established area of restraint south of Harbury Lane and furthermore believes that the wording in 17.13 is blatantly misleading in that it suggests that proposal is to provide an "additional area to prevent BT merging with the urban area" when in fact the area of restraint has in fact been significantly reduced

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3007

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Leave nature alone before this planet is destroyed.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3019

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon

The loss of such a substantial amount of Green Belt and the closing of the gap between Coventry and Kenilworth, thus destroying the environment both for people living in Finham and Green Lane as well as people living in Kenilworth. The loss of wildlife habitat and fertile farmland.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3110

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

The present area of restraint between Warwick Gates and Bishops Tachbrook should be retained without any further encroachment.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3185

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

More emphasis should be placed on maintaining, or even increasing, the areas of restraint.

We STRONGLY and particularly object to the invasion of the established area of restraint south of Harbury Lane and furthermore believes that the wording in 17.13 is blatantly misleading in that it suggests that proposal is to provide an "additional area to prevent BT merging with the urban area" when in fact the area of restraint has in fact been significantly reduced

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3296

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

As above 17a.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3351

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3417

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Sounds a bit contradictory if building/housing is planned for the Thickthorn and Finham areas.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3466

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

It is essential to retain all green belt which has good agricultural soil for farming. We need to be more self sufficient.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3589

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen

object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3682

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Keay

object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3724

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

The Area of Restraint designation on Woodside Farm should remain. A new Area of Restraint should exist from Bishop's Tachbrook ALL the way to Harbury Lane. The Tach Brook should be considered as a Strategic River Corridor owing to both its bio-diversity and its historic role as a boundary (dating back pre-Norman time). Looking north across the Tach Brook from public footpath W105 shows how important this landscape is and the Council's Landscape Character Assessment has demonstrated this.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3766

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4000

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

The councils current areas of restraint mean nothing, as they are being ignored to build more houses. Why do we need to change the current areas of retraint they seem quite adequate, if only the council would accept them as areas of 'restraint'

Sylw

ID sylw: 4093

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I agree there should be areas of restraint - and this should include the area to the south of coventry/north of Kenilworth to avoid the 2 merging into each other. Kenilworth is a unique historic town and should be a separate entity to Coventry.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4106

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

As much protection as can be provided must be provided.