BASE HEADER

Do you support or object to the development of Land at Campion School/south of Sydenham?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 151 i 180 o 260

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45131

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Rev. J.G. Lister

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham, but I would comment that the development north of the bridleway to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45139

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Paul Murphy

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham, but I would comment that the development north of the bridleway to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45147

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45155

Derbyniwyd: 09/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs P Frazier

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham, but I would comment that the development north of the bridleway to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45163

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Larraine Curzon

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham, but I would comment that the development north of the bridleway to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45171

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Noreen Doherty

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45179

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Kirby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- I do not support the development proposal for South of Sydenham, but I would comment that the development north of the bridleway to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45188

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2010

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45196

Derbyniwyd: 08/04/2010

Ymatebydd: Mr R.L.K. Drew

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object
It threatens the village status od Radford Semele, and it will be absorbed into the Warwick/ Leamington conurabtion.
If this development goes ahead and the school is rebuilt, guarantees should be obtained from the developer that the school buildings should be of the highest quality in design, materials and construction, to meet the needs of education in the 21st Century, and steps should be taken to ensure that the developer honours this commitment.
Smaller development would be acceptable

Sylw

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45202

Derbyniwyd: 09/04/2010

Ymatebydd: graham leeke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A restrained approach (reducing development to around 150/200 dwellings) could work well on this site.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45218

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: James Jack

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45226

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Andrew, Julie, Eleanor, Henry Day

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45234

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: A.W Sabin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45242

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: R.G Nelmes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45250

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: B Beauchamp

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45266

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs John and Mary Fletcher

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45274

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: J E Ames

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45282

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: M Jaggard

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45290

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mr M M Beeby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45298

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Edgar George Cousins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45306

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Jenny and Adrian Beran

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45314

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Warden

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45322

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs D. Rees

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45330

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Andrew Ruddins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45338

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: D H Pope

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45346

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: D Forrester

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45354

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Larraine Curzon

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45362

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: B Kitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45370

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: R Martin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.

Gwrthwynebu

Alternative Sites Consultation

ID sylw: 45378

Derbyniwyd: 30/06/2010

Ymatebydd: Mrs Noreen Doherty

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objects to development south of sydenham but considers that development north of the bridleway to to Radford Semele would be acceptable.