BASE HEADER
Blackdown
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48457
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr. Timothy Greasley
Strongly object to the proposed development at Blackdown, which is of great recreational value to the local community. This greenbelt fulfils the five purposes set of the NPPF and there are other sites which can be developed that are not in greenbelt - these sites are mainly to the south of Leamington. There are no exceptional circumstances that outweigh the harm caused by altering the greenbelt boundary.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48459
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Ms Beatriz Martin
Understand need for new houses, but object on Green Belt land.
Suitable/available areas outside Green belt south of Leamington, already identified.
No exceptional circumstances when there is already genuine alternatives where there is enough infrastructure and employment.
NPPF states purpose of Green Belt is to prevent urban sprawl.
Current infrastructure not sufficient to support new development.
Plans for Relief Road at cost of £28 millions , is unacceptable and diverts resources from areas where public investment needed.
Disproportionate housing need.
Leamington and Kenilworth will merge, losing individual identities.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48461
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: mr dave wilkins
Wish to object to proposals to build 2000+ new houses in the North Leamington area. There are other possible sites outside the greenbelt which could be used instead.
Areas of natural beauty and reserves for endangered wildlife will be destroyed and public footpaths disrupted.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48463
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Felicity Kane
Object to greenbelt development at Blackdown which provides all that a greenbelt should and has infinite worth to both the local community and further afield. Can not see any exceptional circumstances to justify the plan and also notes that land is still available to the south of Leamington.
I ...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48465
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Rob & Donna Clifton
Nifer y bobl: 2
Object to development at Blackdown which has great recreational value to the local community. The NPPF places great emphasis on protecting greenbelt and this site fulfils the 5 purposes of greenbelt. There are other sites which can be developed mainly to the south of Leamington that are not in the Greenbelt. There are no exceptional circumstances to the development of greenbelt in this area.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48468
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Bailes
The results of WDC's Green Belt study which scored Blackdown highly have been ignored. If Green Belt development is necessary lower scoring land should be used.
Number of homes
I have ...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48477
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Tim Perkin
Objects to development at Old Milverton and Blackdown. The land has great recreational value, enjoyed by cyclists, runners, riders and walkers. The area fulfils the 5 purposes of greenbelt as set out in the NPPF and should remain as such forever. There are other sites to the south of Leamington outside the greenbelt which were included in the previous 2009 Core Strategy and where employment opportunities and infrastructure already exist. No exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated to justify development in the greenbelt.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48481
Derbyniwyd: 20/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Eliot Brooks
More suitable land exists for development and the Green Belt is a good location for recreation
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48485
Derbyniwyd: 20/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Lesley Johnson
The Greenbelt land has great recreational value and is enjoyed by many.
Development would be detrimental to the character and rural environment.
The Greenbelt serves to prevent urban sprawl and should remain in place.
It prevents sprawl, prevents merging of Leamington and Kenilworth, safeguards countryside from encroachment, preserves character and encourages regeneration.
Sites identified south of Leamington in 2009 should be used.
Infrastructure would have to be improved and extra traffic would cause problems.
No exceptional circumstances exist for developing in Greenbelt.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48489
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Carolyn Miller
Objects to development at Thickthorn and on Land north of Leamington. Understands housing is needed but doesnt consider that the amount is as proposed due to the large number of empty houses unaccounted for. Is concerned about the amount of traffic this development would generate as well as the loss of valuable greenbelt and agricultural land. Land south of Leamington would be a better location as there is an existing road network which could be upgraded more cheaply than a new northern relief road. Converting the A452 into a dual carridgeway will not help traffic flow through Kenilworth.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48490
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Amandip Kaur Kandola
Strongly oppose building on green belt land at Blackdown. The NPPF requires very special circumstances for development in the greenbelt. These special circumstances include: when there is no other land options for housing. However land to the south of Leamington is available for development and has a substantial amount of infrastructure to support it. The green belt helps prevent sprawl, provides an aesthetically pleasing green lung between Leamington and Kenilworth and has substantial amenity value.
...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48498
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Mellard
NPPF states Government attaches great importance to Greenbelts and fundamental aim is to prevent urban sprawl.
Land fulfils 5 purposes of Greenbelt.
Greenbelt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances. Consideration of the developers' financial opportunity not a "very special circumstance".
Land has recreational value.
Proposed development and relief road would have detrimental impact.
From evidence base no clear case for developing on Greenfield site and rational for number of homes is not provided.
Other sites mainly to the south of Leamington can be developed with existing employment opportunities and infrastructure.
Close to M40/out of town shopping facilities and good access to town centres.
Relief Road not required. Traffic flows north to south.
Turning A452 into dual carriage way will not help traffic flows.
Rail access not convenient in proposed area.
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states that the Government at...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48507
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Fiona Tansey
The proposed land is designated as Green belt, and no exceptional circumstances have been demonstrated as to why the land should be encroached upon in such a manner as the building of several hundred houses. There are better alternatives to build housing closer to amenities. The area already suffers from a lack of facilities / amenities.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48517
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Marilyn Carbery
Object to the building on green belt land at Blackdown as there are no special circumstances to support development in this area. There are alternative areas for development and this proposal will create congestion, 'out of town' retailing areas, reduce local amenity and an important 'green lung' and remove high quality agricultural land.
...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48522
Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Ms Pamela Kelt
Objects to development at Old Milverton and Blackdown. The previous 2009 Core Strategy did not involve development of the greenbelt between Leamington and Kenilworth. The exceptional circumstances to justify development in the greenbelt have not been demonstrated.
I know...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48526
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Kirsti Sispal
Object to the proposed development at Blackdown as the greenbelt provides an important amenity role as well as preventing urban sprawl, safeguarding the countryside, preserving the character of areas and encouraging urban regeneration. There are no exceptional circumstances which outweigh the harm caused by altering the Greenbelt boundaries in Milverton. There are other sites which are not in the greenbelt that should be used in preference
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48530
Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Dr Alexandra Tansey
The erosion of Green belt land will cause urban sprawl from Leamington spa to Old milverton and subsume the village of Old Milverton into Leamington Spa. Green belt is meant to save the countryside from encroachment by urban development.The land proposed for development is very important for recreational purposes for local people. It is therefore very precious and should be preserved as it is.I am not comfortable with the method explained to us by you as to how you arrive at the number of houses you may require in the future. I believe there is land to the south of Leamington which was earmarked for development in a previous plan but you are not now considering it. Why not? Green Belt should not be invaded unless as a last measure and only after proper assessment
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48532
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Furze
Plan assumes high growth rate. Given continuing economic problems, seems high risk strategy. More realistic assumptions would remove 1400 home buffer and all housing need could be built on identified non Green Belt land.
Meets 5 purposes for Green Belt (NPPF).
Core Strategy identified sufficient/available/suitable non Green Belt land for housing/employment.
Developers making less profit not valid reason to build on green belt.
Proposed relief road likely to lead to people driving out of area for jobs etc. Will encourage development up to road boundaries.
Dualling A452 unlikely to reduce peak time congestion.
Proposed P&R facilities only required if Green Belt developed.
Suspect Garden-city development not what will be built.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48536
Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Edmund Harrison
There is need for houses but proposal would lead to coalescenc with consequential regular traffic problems.
Already severe delay/regular congestion on A452.
Proposed major new road would add to this.
Green belt must be last land resource considered for mass housing development.
Previously identified non-green belt land south of Leamington was in earlier plan.
No exceptional circumstances to justify sacrifice of green belt land (NPPF).
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48544
Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Carley McCarthy
Object to relief road and green belt developments servicing it, specifically developments at Milverton Gardens, Blackdown and Kenilworth.
Regularly use for walks.
Area of outstanding natural beauty.
Plenty of other local locations to develop that would not encroach on beautiful greenbelt areas.
Area floods in extreme weather.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48549
Derbyniwyd: 25/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Annie Powis
Protect our greenbelt land and do not build on any land that includes Old Milverton, Blackdown and Kenilworth.
I live in Leamington, near to the fields and allotments in Old Milverton and often walk amongst the fields, up to St. James's Church and down to the river and weir. It is a beautiful part of Leamington and should not be spoilt in any way.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48554
Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs Norma Russell
Objects to development on greenbelt land which is irreplaceable and should not be lost. Its there to prevent towns from merging and protect the countryside from encroachment. It would result in the loss of wildlife and habitats as well as agricultural land and is enjoyed by many for walking, cycling and running. The proposal for a dual carridgeway on the A452 is unnecessary and the continuation of this through Old Milverton would destroy the area. Questions the scale of housing proposed in North Leamington which will increase congestion and change the beauty of the area.
Fir...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48572
Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Barry, Helen, Patrick and Hermione Thurlow
Objects to development at Old Milverton and Blackdown for the following:
1)Would result in an over provision of housing based on projections from a period of exceptional growth which is already slowing.
2)WDC have not demonstrated the "exceptional circumstances" necessary to build on Green Belt under NPPF.
3)This area of land is used for rural walks and is a vital piece of green land within Warwickshire.
4)The council have identified land east of A452 (Europa Way) South of Heathcote that have better road infrastructure in place.
5)The Relief Road would destroy Old Milverton Village & merge it with Leamington spa.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48578
Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Jill and Neil Butcher
Objects to development on greenbelt land at Old Milverton and Blackdown when other options are available which were included in the Council's 2009 Core Strategy and where employment opportunities and infrastructure already exist. The greenbelt in Old Milverton and Blackdown fulfils the five purposes of greenbelt set out in the NPPF and there are no exceptional circumstances to justify altering the boundary and allowing development on this land.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48584
Derbyniwyd: 08/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Ram Karki
This area is used for recreation
It is importnat for wildlife
There are other sites outside the green belt that are available
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48587
Derbyniwyd: 08/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Chris Langley
The proposeals will result in loss open recreation space. There is no justification for using green belt land, especially as alternatives exist. This is inconsistent with the NPPF.
Given the economic climate, the Council's projections for housing growth seem excessive.
If areas not included in the preferred options get planning permission on appeal, this could lead to overprovision of housing.
The proposals will significantly close the gap between Kenilworth and Leamington.
Infratsructure in the north is less good than in the south and would be more expensive and damaging to provide.
North Leamington has no significant retail or recreational amenities
I tried to registe...
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48589
Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Joanne Baylis
This area is high quality landscape and an historic countryside.
The proposed development will cause congestion
The charatcer and appearance of the area will be ruined
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48590
Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Jean Pritchard
We don't need more shops and supermarkets
This area is importnat for recreation and the landscape is high quality.
Where will all the people in the new houses work? How will our infrastructure cope?
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48595
Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Mrs S.M. Burrows
Green Belt land is not supposed to be developed unless there are exceptional reasons for it. There are no exceptional circumstances better alternatives exist to the south.
Building in the north will undermine the potential for affordable housing because house prices are higher in that area
Making the A452 into a dual carriageway is going to do nothing to alleviate road congestion in the area as most traffic build ups occur going into the town
This area is valuable agricultural land. It supports a variety of wildlife and provides breathing space between the urban areas.
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options
ID sylw: 48597
Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2012
Ymatebydd: Dr Martin Davis
Objects to development on greenbelt land at Old Milverton and Blackdown which is of particular importance both in preserving the individual characters of Leamington and Kenilworth and enabling leisure pursuits and amenity for local residents. There is only limited publicly accessible space in this part of Leamington. These proposals would result in urban sprawl contrary to the NPPF and is not justified by any exceptional circumstances. Development will increase existing pressure on heavily congested roads and turning the A452 into a dual carridgeway will not prevent the build up of traffic as it enters Leamington at rush hour, and Warwick and Leamington already suffer from traffic issues. The relief road would further erode the greenbelt and destroy the rural character of Old Milverton. Questions how much extra housing is really required given the difficulty of predicting future demand based on the current economic climate. There is a powerful case for developing in the areas of South Leamington previously identified by the Council: there is less danger of urban sprawl and there are existing employment opportunities and infrastructure which would reduce potential commuting pressures.