H28 - Hatton Park - north of Birmingham Road

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 30 o 32

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68101

Derbyniwyd: 16/03/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Charles Cain

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The infrastructure cannot cope with added vehicles on the A4177. The traffic will be a danger to school children who get the bus from Hatton park or cross the traffic to use Ugly Bridge Road.
The roads and fields flood. There is no plan to cope with this.
It is prime green belt land that provides a natural boundary for the existing development.

Cefnogi

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68136

Derbyniwyd: 01/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Dubelbeis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I support the inclusion of this land for further housing. I do question the apparent suitability of the land which does not seem capable of being drained. This area is very often saturated and the consequence is the flooding of the adjacent A4177 thus creating further danger on an already problematic road.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68147

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Greg Meadwell

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed development does not accord with development in the greenbelt as set out and established in NPPF.

Little or no consideration has been made in respect of improvements to local services including, but not limited to:

transport and travel
Education
Doctors/Dentists

Reference to the site as 'Brownley Green Lane' is misleading. The site is to be accessed via Barcheston Drive, within Hatton Park. Little or no consideration to this appears to have been nade given the tight housing estate roads, difference in ground levels between Barcheston Drive and the proposed development, access to/parking at the Hatton Park Village Hall

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68150

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: mrs cherylin preston

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the prosed plans as there is a lack of detail, the impact on the environment, the increased congestion and the proposal to build on a flood plain. Hatton Park lacks all facilities and requires those living there to travel by car or public transport for everything, shopping, schools, doctors and there is only one road to and from Warwick which is heavily congested morning and night. No plans have been put in place to improve the infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68151

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Lesley Roberts

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Flood risk
Traffic congestion
School and preschool placements
Health services
Increased pollution

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68152

Derbyniwyd: 04/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Preston

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Field is a flood risk already, more houses would add to this.
The Birmingham road faces major congestion each day, more houses will add to this.
Increase pollution and loss of green belt will spoil the environment.
There is no plans to improve or alleviate the pressure on local services such as schools.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68166

Derbyniwyd: 06/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr Paul and Alison Sutcliffe

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The methodological flaws in the data gathering process, failure to incorporate and synthesise all the available evidence should be taken extremely seriously and cast doubt on the objectivity of decisions made from it.

Testun llawn:

We note that concerning the Duty to Cooperate, the Inspector in his letter of the 1 June 2015, "was satisfied that the Council has engaged constructively, actively and on an ongoing basis in terms of overall housing provision and indeed other strategic matters. I conclude therefore that the Council has complied with the duty to co-operate." This may look to be the case from reading the documents produced, however we do not feel that the council has "actively engaged" through a transparent and appropriate methodology which has enabled the general public an opportunity to participate and engage constructively. We feel that the council has repeatedly made poor attempts at responding to questions by residents of Hatton Park at meetings. There have been strong oppinions voiced over many years about about these damaging ongoing plans (H28) and yet the reported "evidence base" seems based on a select number of willing responders who are capable of understanding how to make a representation. The data is therefore skewed, non-representative, and biased. Had more appropriate research evidence-based methodology been considered, for example mixed methods (i.e., both qualititative and quantitative research), and a greater breadth of synthesis techniques, then a more robust and rigorous evidence-base would have been gathered. This in turn, would have given us greater confidence that a more representative documentation of the plethora of objections would have been reported.

We feel helpless in the decisions that are being made about these future plans. The council are still unable to answer our questions about road access to these increased number of houses on this site, issues regarding flooding on the land which remains waterlogged for most of the year, and many other issues (e.g., managing the overcapacity of local schools, damage to wildlife, severe traffic congestion).

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68171

Derbyniwyd: 07/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposal to build 120 new houses is unsuitable for land which is subject to flooding, attachment shows its current waterlogged state. Egress onto the A4177 will be impossible to manage due to the already clogged road network through narrow Ebrington Drive to Barcheston Drive & the congested access onto the A4177. The proposal is not environmentally sustainable and poses a risk to health and well-being through flooding and vehicle pollution. There would be a need for retail, school and medical facilities on such a large estate. This is not a Housing Market Area that can take any more development.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68350

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: John Higgs

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the Hatton Park proposals unless assurances concerning highways & community facilities are explored.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68545

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carla Smith

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Reasons for removing this land from the green belt are not sufficient. Proposed density is too dense. Proposed land floods every time it rains. Too much pressure on local amenities (schools, Warwick Hospital, GPs). Too much traffic on the Birmingham Road (which is already at a standstill eastbound outside Hatton Park during rush hour). No sufficient public transport--one bus into town per hour if you're lucky (with a travel time into Warwick of an hour!).

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68554

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: mr Simon Evans

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

1] the area is a flood plane
2] the area can not copy with the increase traffic 3] you do not have enough School places
4] the council can not look after its current Residence let alone bring more people to the area

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68614

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Jean Faulkner

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Loss of green belt
Lack of infrastructure
Flooding on site
Lack of capacity in existing facilities and services
Pollution

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68617

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sian Fellows

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objection towards increased development for 175 houses because Ferncumbe School and Budbrook school will not be able to cope with increased population and the A4177 already experiences high level of traffic on daily basis. Another 2 issues for sites between Charingworth Drive and A4177: 1. Ancient woodland being locked by the development and also the wildlife will be affected even though suggested plan allows for wildlife corridor but this would not be sufficient as this wildlife is feeding off the insects and vegetation with the field. 2. Assuming an increase in 150 plus cars would lead to congestion during peak travel times with increase in traffic and resulting in a potential accident spot.

Testun llawn:

I would like to register my objection to the Warwickshire revised local plan (2016) for Hatton Park.

My concerns over the planned increased development for 175 houses in the Hatton park area are:
1. Ferncumbe primary school and Budbrook school are both on site restricting their growth. With the proposed planning in Hatton Park and Hampton Magna these schools will not be able to cope with the increased population, resulting in children having to be transported further afield.
2.The A4177 of which the suggested site feeds onto, already experiences a high level of traffic and has congestion on a daily bases, this will not only be increased by the suggested houses for Hatton park but also by other planned developments along the route.

Objection to WDC preferred site between Charingworth Drive and A4177 (Birmingham road)

I have two major objections to this site
1. This site boarders Smiths Covert- an area of ancient woodland. Developing this area will result in this ancient woodland being locked in by development. This is of grave concern as there is a large amount of protected animals within the site: Bats, Muntjac Deer, Badgers, Foxes, Birds of prey, Green and spotted Woodpeckers to name but a few. I understand that the suggested plan allows for a wildlife corridor, but I feel this would not be sufficient as currently this wildlife is feeding off the insects and vegetation with the field and by reducing the size to a wildlife corridor would not be sufficient to provide for the large amount of species within the woodland therefore, dramatically upsetting the biodiversity resulting in the deterioration of an irreplaceable habitat. According to WDC a 'critical friend' analysis of Warwick district council draft green belt assessment this is exactly what you want to avoid - it even highlights preventing deterioration of ancient woodland of which would occur by developing this site.
I am shocked to see other site were discounted due to the effect on wildlife, when this site is the one that would have the most effect due to proximity to the ancient woodland.

2. The access to the suggested site is also of great concern. Within Hatton park the average house has two plus cars, resulting in an increase of 150 cars plus any vehicles servicing the house. I believe two access points are planned one directly onto the A4177 and another along Ebrington drive, Congestion within peak travel times currently backs into Hatton park which will become unbearable with the increase traffic. The potential planned access point directly onto the Birmingham road is of great concern as this would be very close to the turning to ugly bridge road and into the petrol station, resulting in a potential accident blackspot.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68710

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Veronica Chapman

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

- Plans to put traffic lights on the stanks roundabout to relieve traffic congestion or accidents on M40 or A46 will not help on the Birmingham road.
- H28 is prone to flooding during heavy rain and doesn't hold surface water - flood occurs.
- Building houses will reduce the green belt area.
- The existing traffic problems along with other infrastructural problems need to be acknowledged.

Testun llawn:

I do not believe that development of these areas, when the infrastructure is already severely under strain can in any way show that these plans have been positively prepared.
In my previous objection, which I assume is still on record, I wrote of the virtually impossible task of getting into and through Warwick on a weekday basis without leaving Hatton Park at a ridiculous hour in the morning. This is still the case, as is the utter gridlock which occurs whenever there is an accident on the M40 or A46, which frequently happens. Plans to put traffic lights on the Stanks roundabout to relieve the congestion of cars exiting the A46 for Warwick, will in no way help the queue of traffic on the Birmingham Road which, at various times in the peak travel hours sees traffic backed up to Five Ways Island, a distance of some three miles or more.
My previous comments relating to the number of accidents that have occurred on the Birmingham Road, two local schools which are already full, despite recent expansion of one, overburdened doctors surgeries and local hospital remain relevant.

H28 in particular is prone to flooding during heavy spells of rain and badly holds surface water. It has been stated, that any potential developer would have to satisfy the Environment Agency of their plans to satisfactorily rectify this problem prior to development, in order not to cause future problems. This however does not inspire confidence. It is frequently reported in the news where new homes have been built on similar pieces of land and due to shoddy groundwork regularly flood, with the residents paying the price.

A survey conducted by our local Parish Council identified the need for a small number of homes within the parish, this number was under 20. It was felt that these homes could be provided by building on Brownfield and windfall sites. The survey was well prepared with a high percentage of residents responding. In the time that has elapsed since the survey, no huge changes in the area have taken place. The sudden inclusion with no prior notification of H53 within the plan, along with an increased number of houses for H28, bringing the number of proposed new homes for Hatton Park to 175, which do not appear to be needed, cannot justify or show exceptional circumstances for removing these parcels of land from the Greenbelt.

I do accept the need for further housing but only when plans have been well prepared and thought out. What is happening in Warwickshire seems to be neither. The destruction of Greenbelt without demonstrating exceptional circumstances flies in the face of the Governments' own policy. No further building work should be allowed throughout much of Warwickshire and certainly not in the immediate Warwick Town area. The existing traffic problems need to be acknowledged, a sensible long term plan for dealing with major traffic increase along with other infrastructure problems needs to be produced. Foisting thousands of new homes into an area and then attempting (or not) to deal with the resulting problems is madness.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68754

Derbyniwyd: 31/03/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Morton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed conversion of areas H53 and H28 on the Hatton Park Proposed Modification should be rejected.
The areas are GREEN BELT, and must be preserved.
The areas are working farmland and must be used for crop growing and livestock.
The current boundaries of Hatton Park should be maintained.

Atodiadau:

4907_R.pdf (2.73 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68856

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elaine Dixon

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to proposal: -
- loss of green belt
- land subject to flooding
- impact on current balancing solution
- extant congestion would be exacerbated
- impact on local schools

Atodiadau:

13818-1_R.pdf (2.84 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 68977

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. A. Burrows

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Surely it would be better for WDC to plan for a new school on the site along with development of sites H28 and H53 which would provide a far more sustainable option for existing and future residents as this would increase social cohesion and reduce the need to travel?

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69279

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Walpole-Brown

Asiant : Brown and Co

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

To maintain our objection to the proposed allocations, etc. of Sites H28 and H53 at Hatton Park and the fact that Hatton Green has still not be classified as a Growth Village or another category created and generally the inappropriateness of some of the sites indicated. They lead to development in far less sustainable and appropriate locations and will be challenged in the Inquiry process.

Atodiadau:

7504-1.pdf (90.50 KB)
7504-2 Response_Form_2016 - Statement.pdf (91.18 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69389

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs P Legg

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Plan is not positively prepared as the necessary Infrastructure planning is not forthcoming , school places, doctors and shops are all currently oversubscribed.
Area is a flood risk zone.
Traffic remains a problem on the local network and construction traffic would make the situation untenable. The exceptional circumstances for removing this land from the Green Belt are not made.

Atodiadau:

5173-1_R.pdf (548.84 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69412

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Staley

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These representations are in addition to objections made at the Draft Local Plan stage. Increase in numbers for this site suggests increase in density out of character with Hatton Park. The increase will result in more congestion and will increase air pollution. It would also increases the risk of flooding onto Birmingham Road

Atodiadau:

11810_R.pdf (150.93 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69416

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Halliday

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposals for Hatton Park are not consistent with the NPPF for te following reasons:
Transport: para 32 requires safe and suitable access. Birmingham Road is already congested and will get worse as a result of housing proposals. Access through Hampton on the Hill is not a suitable alternative. The access point for site H28 is not safe.
Cumulative impacts: the cumulative impacts of proposals in Hatton Park and Hampton Magna need to be considered, plus new homes at Opus 40 and expansion at Warwick Parkway. Together this is likely to have a major impact on traffic flows. Theoretical modelling has failed to address these issues adequately. This will have knock-on effects for public transport too.
Infrastructure: The general superficial assurances in the IDP are not sufficient for water supply, waste water, and energy. No assessment has been made in relation to GP surgeries.
The plan is not positively prepared. It should encourage reductions in green house gas emissions and reduce congestion and should minimise the need to travel. The allocations at Hatton Park conflict with these requirements.
The Plan is not justified: the proposals for 175 dwellings at Hatton Park has not been justified including as measured against the capacity of Birmingham Road. The indicative capacity at Hampton Magna has been significantly exceeded, but no account has been taken of the impact of this on infrastructure.
The sustainability appraisal for an adjacent site to H28 was considered for Gypsy and Travellers but was assessed as having a major negative impact relating to air, water and soil and the prudent use of land. There were also concerns regarding noise, air quality and light pollution which could have negative impacts on health.
The plan is not effective particularly in relation t infrastructure delivery which lacks detailed assessments for water, sewerage sand electricity transmission. Drainage is already an issue on Birmingham Road and an assessment has not been made as to how this should be mitigated. Further no assessment has been of the capacity at Hampton Magna GP surgery to cope with the additional housing. The education capacity an future has not been fully assessed and there is no clear plan to put in place expanded accommodation at the time it is needed.
The Plan s not legally compliant as the site at Hatton Park has failed the sustainability assessment

Atodiadau:

9633_R.pdf (278.97 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69419

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Steve Halliday

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposals for Hatton Park are not consistent with the NPPF for te following reasons:
Transport: para 32 requires safe and suitable access. Birmingham Road is already congested and will get worse as a result of housing proposals. Access through Hampton on the Hill is not a suitable alternative. The access point for site H28 is not safe.
Cumulative impacts: the cumulative impacts of proposals in Hatton Park and Hampton Magna need to be considered, plus new homes at Opus 40 and expansion at Warwick Parkway. Together this is likely to have a major impact on traffic flows. Theoretical modelling has failed to address these issues adequately. This will have knock-on effects for public transport too.
Infrastructure: The general superficial assurances in the IDP are not sufficient for water supply, waste water, and energy. No assessment has been made in relation to GP surgeries.
The plan is not positively prepared. It should encourage reductions in green house gas emissions and reduce congestion and should minimise the need to travel. The allocations at Hatton Park conflict with these requirements.
The Plan is not justified: the proposals for 175 dwellings at Hatton Park has not been justified including as measured against the capacity of Birmingham Road. The indicative capacity at Hampton Magna has been significantly exceeded, but no account has been taken of the impact of this on infrastructure.
The sustainability appraisal for an adjacent site to H28 was considered for Gypsy and Travellers but was assessed as having a major negative impact relating to air, water and soil and the prudent use of land. There were also concerns regarding noise, air quality and light pollution which could have negative impacts on health.
The plan is not effective particularly in relation t infrastructure delivery which lacks detailed assessments for water, sewerage sand electricity transmission. Drainage is already an issue on Birmingham Road and an assessment has not been made as to how this should be mitigated. Further no assessment has been of the capacity at Hampton Magna GP surgery to cope with the additional housing. The education capacity an future has not been fully assessed and there is no clear plan to put in place expanded accommodation at the time it is needed.
The Plan is not legally compliant as the site at Hatton Park has failed the sustainability assessment

Atodiadau:

9843_R.pdf (274.42 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69502

Derbyniwyd: 21/03/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ruth Speczyk

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

-Building 55 number of dwellings will impact on the dynamics of the local community.
-The scenic views across open countryside would be destroyed due to this development.
-Extra facilities like local schooling, nearby children's recreation area, health clinic will be required which is not stated in the plan.
-Increase in traffic.
-Pleasant village will turn into an urbanized town.

Atodiadau:

9707_R.pdf (52.51 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69534

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Ms Myra Styles

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The modification plans with increased housing numbers have been issued without proper consultation with the local community and without regard to the burden on the existing infrastructure. No definite assurance of what will be done prior to any development for improving the local road network, safety from increasing accidents in the H28 (A4177), easing the traffic congestion, overcoming the existing poor drainage issues and adding the poor air quality from this main road. No school or health services included and no identification of 'open spaces' in the proposal. No regard for greenbelt or sustainability in the long-term.

Atodiadau:

9988_R.pdf (207.01 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69548

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elaine Kemp

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Lack of infrastructure in Hatton
Need to provide the infrastructure before the housing
Increase in housing will cause additional traffic issues
Site is located within a flood risk area
No exceptional circumstances to justify development in the Green Belt
Impact on school places and NHS services

Atodiadau:

4935_R.pdf (3.43 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69580

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Cochrane

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The modifications have not been subject to proper consultation. They do not take in to account impacts on infrastructure. There is no clarity as to how the local road network in terms of congestion and safety issues will be address prior to development. The area experiences poor drainage and suffers from poor air quality which have not been addressed. The access is dangerous. There are insufficient school and GP places. No open space is identified. No clear proposals for the site layout. No regard is given to the impacts on the green belt and long term sustainability.
In all this is just an outline concept which cannot be sound.

Atodiadau:

9989_R.pdf (143.55 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69866

Derbyniwyd: 19/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Hatton Parish Council

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Site lies in green belt - no exceptional circumstances justify its removal
Site omits strips of land to north and east,, which are not agriculturally viable and no indication how dereliction will be prevented.
Re: Local Plan preparation - final revision of site (reducing site area without reducing density) was not subject to consultation with community

Atodiadau:

1108-1_R.pdf (3.22 MB)

Cefnogi

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 70092

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: The Burman Family

Asiant : Nigel Gough Associates Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support release of H28

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 70101

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: G R Knibb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object to allocation: -
- lack of consultation with residents
- WDC did not seek alternative sites
- green belt boundaries should only be altered under exceptional circumstances
- allocation of sites at Hampton Magna and Hatton Park in excess of what is required
- WDC did not consider Bubbenhall as a growth village close to Coventry, nor Stoneleigh or Weston under Wetherley
- site assessments not properly updated, inadequate
- poor accessibility
- lack of local infrastructure, community facilities and capacity constraints
- drainage /sewage issues
- adverse impact on environment, wildlife, recreational activity
- additional congestion
- pollution

Atodiadau:

11963_R.pdf (99.66 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 70150

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Wilkie

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Previous objections to H28 have been ignored and the modification to H28 has increased the number of houses proposed from 80 to 120.
Hatton Park should not be considered a "growth village" as it does not have amenities such as schools and doctors that are required to justify changing the green belt boundary.
The proposed development would increase traffic from Hatton Park by 25% and is not sustainable as there are no advantages to current residents.

Atodiadau:

11594_R.pdf (161.78 KB)
11594-1_R.pdf (455.77 KB)