Other

ID sylw: 86004

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Harris

I don't disagree with the policy statement I just haven't seen evidence of it in practice in my local area (Wootton Wawen); development has been predominantly high value owner occupied properties (small scale in fill sites) which is what the developers have wanted to build.

Yes

ID sylw: 86064

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 86133

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Clive Corrie

This is a sensible approach, housing need surveys need to be carried out on a local basis to determine the number ant types of housing required.

No

ID sylw: 86206

Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Professor Paul Bywaters

This response gives me no confidence that the need for affordable homes will be given sufficient priority. A much more specific and detailed commitment to this priority should be given.

No

ID sylw: 86253

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle McHugh

Homes should be more affordable, building more homes won't mean they are affordable. House builders will profit.

Other

ID sylw: 86319

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Daniel Chandler

While affordable housing is absolutely required, developers and property investors will purchase significant swathes of new housing for rentals. Rather than hitting a target, this is the problem that needs addressing. If the council and Government are serious about allowing affordable housing then restrictions on renting need to be implemented. A much more value oriented approach than simply building more.

Yes

ID sylw: 86333

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Noel Davis

It obvious that developers want to maximise their profits. However they achieve this by building large exopensive houses. The real need is for starter homes and 2/3 bed family homes

Yes

ID sylw: 86374

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Laura Benson

Affordable housing must be at different scales. It is no good only providing small 1-2 bedroom homes that are affordable. 3-4 bedroom family homes also need to be accessible to people on lower-medium incomes.

Yes

ID sylw: 86375

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Laura Benson

It is vital that new developments are fully adopted by councils to prevent profiteering by organisations such as Centrick and FirstPort who charge astronomical service charges/ground rent.

No

ID sylw: 86592

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

This Draft Policy Direct is far too weak and vague.
The problem with a housing crisis is not lack of building, it bis lack of building the type and size of homes that are needed.

Developers will always try to avoid or water down an affordable housing options because they make less money that way. The housing need is not to further enrich developers, it is to provide affordable housing.

The councils should prioritise affordable and denser housing in all cases. If there is a potential to develop a site with more sustainable and affordable housing it MUST be taken.

Yes

ID sylw: 86606

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Although I agree with the proposed policy close attention should be given to its implementation especially when considering the existing provision that may be available in adjacent areas that may be considered to be in a "cluster."

No

ID sylw: 86612

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Rachel Smith

The needs of the current residents of Shipston on Stour are not even being met with no hospital beds and an insufficient sewerage system that Severn Trent is regularly being called out to deal with. The issues have not been resolved and any more developments in this area will increase existing problems

No

ID sylw: 86905

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

The government has not dealt with the existing fleecehold problem re almost all new estates where a management company is set up and put in the control of spivs who then charge the freeholders pretty much what they like without any freeholder say/annual meetings. No more development increasing flood risk. Need proper immigration control.

No

ID sylw: 87011

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

It also needs to include the views of local communities in the determination of housing type and quality.

Other

ID sylw: 87054

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

There should be a mixture of affordable housing. they should not have to pay additional costs such as paying for the upkeep of amenity land or extra expenses to be paid to the council should they decide to sell the part pf the house they might own.

No

ID sylw: 87267

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Parry

You need more affordable houses for young people, and more affordable bungalows for older people, all with access to local transport and services.

No

ID sylw: 87313

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd:

Numbers of dwellings intended for Warwick Leam Spa seem disproportionately high relative to size of population growth and 90,000 current inhabitants.

Yes

ID sylw: 87383

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87566

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

No

ID sylw: 87662

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Enness

Too vauge

No

ID sylw: 87784

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Katarzyna Wielis

Often new build estates in the area are big and expensive homes and seem to ignore any sort of 'right sizing '. For example Kenilworth gates where the cheapest house was over £450k

No

ID sylw: 87809

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Godson

While delivering new homes is important, this plan fails to prioritize accessibility to essential facilities, adequate parking, and genuinely affordable housing. Simply increasing housing numbers without ensuring residents can access shops, healthcare, schools, and employment will worsen congestion and strain local services. The plan does not define affordability in relation to local wages, meaning many will still be priced out. Existing residents, already struggling with congestion and overstretched services, see no clear benefits or commitments. Sustainable development must prioritize infrastructure, affordability, and transport solutions over just meeting housing targets. Without this, new developments risk being disconnected and unsustainable.

No

ID sylw: 88105

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: J Hall

Complete and absolute overdevelopment around Warwick for new homes. Infrastructure does not have the jobs or roads to accomodate.

No

ID sylw: 88231

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Baxter

Any develoments with public open spaces should be fully adopted by the local authority and not handed over to a third party management company who will then levy a fee on top of the council tax to maintain the land. This is grossly unfair and discriminates against the less well off who will be occupying the affordable housing stock.

No

ID sylw: 88234

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Vining

Warwick/Bearley
This site is greenbelt. It is not a new settlement but would fuse two settlements which flies in the face of the original intent of greenbelt. It is very near to SuA and as shown the gap comprises an area which was described as ‘weak greenbelt’ that is likely to be filled in due course thus ultimately fusing this settlement with SuA. The Bishopton site is therefore a better prospect, sitting astride a much more competent road (A46) and SuA Parkway. Its selection has no logic unless it was simply land put forward by landowners and entered unchecked.

No

ID sylw: 88236

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Vining

Bearley / Wilmcote Infrastructure.
Meon Vale already has consented housing which can’t be serviced properly by infrastructure because of overload of the roads on the west side of SuA. The Western relief road funding was pulled. Until funding of infrastructure is addressed as a priority a site like BW should be excluded. The Birmingham Road is undersized, with bottle necks entering town from this direction and also into and from Henley. A new settlement at any point along this route is ridiculous. The A46 has many more surrounding fields along it which could receive a new settlement more easily.

No

ID sylw: 88238

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Vining

Bearley / Wilmcote Infrastructure
Sewerage and community facilities such as doctors, shops etc would all be needed to avoid having to go to SuA which, as above, is already congested. It is well known that developers provide this last in any expansion and are not held to book for not doing so.

No

ID sylw: 88239

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Vining

How was site determined in first place when clearly unsuitable
Prone to flooding
Road Network Substandard
Poor Urban planning leading to fusing of new settlement to SuA.
Wanton approach to delivering on Greenbelt
Impact on Heritage and a conservation zone
Failure of SDC and PC to engage and consult properly and Predetermination

No

ID sylw: 88254

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Vining

Bearley/Wilmcote
The flood map shows the railway valley flooding. The low permeability of surrounding higher land is the land proposed for housing. Heavy rainstorms mean water flows across the Birmingham Road as overloaded fields shed water towards the railway, not soaking up water. Housing means the flooding will expand massively, affecting Newnham, Aston Cantlow and the already poor surrounding lowlands. The railway cutting through Wilmcote will be deluged and unusable periodically. The canal is not designed as an outlet and C&RT would not allow it. BW is in the worst position possible - uphill from many sensitive assets.

No

ID sylw: 88259

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Vining

Bearley/Wilmcote Mary Arden’s Farm.
With respect to other villages Wilmcote does hold a valuable status for Heritage and to expand the village in such a blunt manner would be disastrous and strip it of the charm which attracts tourism. Our MP is addressing the opening of MAF. With regard to flooding mentioned elsewhere, and the increased traffic coming through the village, this would leave Mary Arden's Farm vulnerable.