Other

ID sylw: 94804

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

Yes – but suggest that the requirement for a bedroom to be large enough for 2 occupants should be more carefully defined eg “room for 2 of 900mm single beds with space of Xmm beside and between each”

Yes

ID sylw: 94843

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Yes

Other

ID sylw: 95112

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Clarke

Whilst I agree that all people have the right to live in homes that meet their personal needs and circumstances, the number of homes that are wheelchair accessible seems to be disproportionate to the percentage of the population that are wheelchair users.
Properties that are specifically altered to make them wheelchair accessible may benefit from being co-located and given priority access to transport routes/medical facilities etc, but might also have reduced market potential as a result of their specific design bias.

Yes

ID sylw: 95219

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson

Harbury rural housing provides an excellent example of meeting the needs of local people in a small development.

No

ID sylw: 95293

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alamo

Asiant : Harris Lamb

The requisite evidence to warrant all new houses accord with NDSS is not provided

No

ID sylw: 95695

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wilson Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

we do not consider robust evidence has been presented to require all homes to be NDSS compliant.

Yes

ID sylw: 95702

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

N/A

No

ID sylw: 95727

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

Yes

ID sylw: 95914

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Minimum standards should be mandatory

Yes

ID sylw: 96045

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Marshall

It is important and appropriate to provide homes for all sizes of families and for a range of ages and mobility.

Yes

ID sylw: 96313

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this draft Policy.

No

ID sylw: 96463

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Ledger

Large sprawling developments continue to provide insufficient houses that are affordable for local people. Number of houses required continue to be based on flawed calculations and outdated evidence. Developments in the area are having a detrimental impact on the character and beauty of Leamington and Warwick leading to a loss of identity.

Yes

ID sylw: 96484

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Isobel Hazelwood

I do not think that lack of funds should be any reason for a developer not to be required to implement the Amenity Standards.

Yes

ID sylw: 96528

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Shipston Town Council

Minimum standards should be mandatory.

Yes

ID sylw: 96655

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Catherine Mitchley

I agree with the need to provide adequate space and adaptable dwellings to accommodate the population's changing needs over time. Would support flexibility and sensitivity when older properties are incorported into new schemes to ensure character is retained. It is beneficial to well-being to have varied housing stock to create pleasant living environment.
Would urge that new buildings are constructured to a high and durable standard using quality materials and skilled labour - the current worrying trend of quick cheap construction without regard to being 'built to last' is short sighted and costly to the environment and future generations.

Yes

ID sylw: 96667

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Dinnie

uphold minimum standards.

Yes

ID sylw: 96824

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Quinn

NA

Yes

ID sylw: 96847

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Agreed that all residential dwellings should comply with national standards. Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) also suggests that with reference to the Development Management Considerations, it would be prudent to strengthen the requirement that applicants demonstrate that compliance with the provisions is not practical and financially viable, and make it a condition that independent assessment is also required.

Yes

ID sylw: 96930

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97128

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

No

ID sylw: 97241

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.

Yes

ID sylw: 97321

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy White

N/a

Other

ID sylw: 97380

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Godwin Developments

Godwin Developments acknowledge the proposed policy direction but as noted by the National Planning Policy Guidance that the implementation of Nationally Described Space Standards (NDSS) needs to take into consideration a range factors including need and viability.

Other

ID sylw: 97460

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr HUGH KEEP

I agree generally but worry about the Development Management Considerations. In recent years the "not practical and financially viable" has been used to avoid building affordable housing.

No

ID sylw: 97463

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Asiant : Harris Lamb

no evidence has been presented that justifies all houses having to accord with NDSS.

Other

ID sylw: 97569

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brenda Stewart

Current building often seems to include an unnecessary number of larger houses. There should be a limit on this and a maximum size, as well as a minimum size for new housing.

Yes

ID sylw: 97682

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Susan Leonard

Bedrooms should be large enough for at least 2 people.

Other

ID sylw: 97800

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

No comment is made regarding other than affordable homes. Is it to be assumed that proposed settlements wilk consist only of these?

Other

ID sylw: 97928

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Samuel Gillick-Daniels

This policy describes space/size requirements once number of bedrooms and affordability has already been set. This misses the intrinsic link between the right size of home and its number of bedrooms/affordability. In other words, the number of 2-bed houses in total relate to providing the right size of homes for South Warwickshire residents (and in the right places).

No

ID sylw: 98089

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited

Asiant : Marrons

The NPPF at Footnote 51 is clear that optional technical standards and the Nationally Described Space Standard should only be enforced through planning policy where this would address an identified need and where it can be justified. Policies will need to be tested for their impact on viability.