BASE HEADER

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 91 i 120 o 158

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101593

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Homes Ltd

Asiant : Stansgate Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

While the policy’s reference to the 20-minute neighbourhood concept aligns with the NPPF’s sustainable travel aims, the NPPF does not mention this approach, and its application within South Warwickshire needs further consideration. The SWLP technical evidence “Guide to existing housing densities in South Warwickshire” defines a 20-minute neighbourhood as achieving access to everyday services within a 10-minute walk or cycle each way. These aims are unrealistic for larger strategic residential developments located adjacent to larger settlements, as well as developments within smaller settlements, where infrastructure constraints and service provision limitations make such proximity difficult to achieve.

Greater flexibility should be applied to acknowledge the challenges of implementing the 20-minute neighbourhoods’ model in areas where everyday services are not available within such a short distance.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101627

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jo Valentine Barker

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

D2d. Much more flexible design working the landscape. Build a 21st century aesthetic

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101690

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This development is not good for the area

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 101930

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Disagree;
Pedestrians and cycles should be separated from vehicle movements, the safety of all road users should be prioritised in the hierarchy of pedestrians first, cyclists second and road users third, but the safety and convenience of all should be considered to make sure all travel infrastructure optimised for all, not one group at the expense of the others.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102065

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Crump

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These principles are laudable in themselves in pointing towards new settlements being self-sufficient, with all within reach of residents within 20 minutes on foot. If they can get to work and avail themselves of shops and other amenities in this manner then carbon emissions will be held in check. If, however, residents need to use their cars to travel to and from work in urban areas, then pollution and congestion will ensue. If the development is to truly enhance the natural environment, it needs to be of a scale that does not overshadow or emasculate its inherent significance.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102133

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

why can't we be more ambitious for a 15 minute neighbourhood. Emphasise permeability for pedestrians and cyclists as well as prioritisation.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102200

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

74. IM Land broadly supports Draft Policy Direction 25. As stated previously, IM Land are concerned with the use of the phase “attractive” which is subjective and could lead to a difference of approach to design across the authorities.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102291

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

BDW supports the strategic design principles in the SWLP, aligning with the National Design Guide and NPPF to promote sustainable, community-focused development. The proposed Cophams Hill project exemplifies the 20-minute neighbourhood concept, integrating essential services within walking or cycling distance to reduce car dependence, enhance local economies, and foster social connections.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102295

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Alton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst many of the stated goals of the Council's polices are fine, the Council's track record in delivering them has been poor. In particular, the Council has failed to properly protect green belt land, poorly executed road projects, it has become too close to developers resulting in inappropriate residential development and a mix of properties which do not meet the needs of local residents. It has chased CILS payments to the detriment of residents and local amenity. This must stop and should be reflected in planning policies.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102354

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Taylor Wimpey supports the Draft Policy Direction in principle and emphasises the opportunity presented by the Site at land at north Leamington as demonstrated by the Vision Document. Further detail in respect of the Site is submitted via the Call for Sites exercise being undertaken in parallel with the Regulation 18 consultation.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102355

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

While the policy’s reference to the 20-minute neighbourhood concept aligns with the NPPF’s sustainable travel aims, the NPPF does not mention this approach, and its application within South Warwickshire needs further consideration. The SWLP technical evidence “Guide to existing housing densities in South Warwickshire” defines a 20-minute neighbourhood as achieving access to everyday services within a 10-minute walk or cycle each way. Greater flexibility should be applied to acknowledge the challenges of implementing the 20-minute neighbourhoods’ model in areas where everyday services are not available within such a short distance.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102436

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hill Residential

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hill Residential is supportive of this draft policy. Indeed, the proposals for ‘Hatton Villages’ (as outlined in the separate call for sites submission and summarised in response to Table 6 and proposed new settlement location B1 ‘Land at Hatton’) have been designed with these design principles in mind.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102509

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Sue Cole

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Historic England's comment concerning reflecting "local character and history" should be embedded into the first four design principles.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102666

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Penelope Beswick

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I totally agree with Historic England that "local character and history, including the surrounding build environment and landscape setting" and this should be incorporated within a strategic design policy. Volume housebuilders are very bad at this - the developments to the south of Leamington Spa show no reference to local character and history despite being the "gateway" to Leamington when approaching from the M40. The large block of flats on the roundabout near Wanzl dominates this approach and apart from being finished with render bears no relationship to Leamington at all - the scale and detailing is very disappointing.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102874

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The University supports the themes of this draft policy direction. The proposed principles reflect the University’s own aspirations for the creation of well designed and sustainable places, as set out in the recently adopted SPD. The University also supports the 20 minute neighbourhood concept.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102924

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Propernomics Ltd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy notes that it is beneficial if people's day to day needs can be met within walking distance. However, there will be many desirable developments that cannot operate as "20-minute neighbourhoods" due to their size, context or other external factors. The policy should be clear that it is referring to new settlements (insert "new") rather than smaller sites or plots.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 102930

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The above principles should be followed with full transparency and strict criteria as to which areas best serve the housing needs of South Warwickshire. Selection of sites should in no way be influenced by developers preference for easy and cheap to develop sites.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103067

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes

Asiant : Marrons

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

While the policy’s reference to the 20-minute neighbourhood concept aligns with the NPPF’s sustainable travel aims, the NPPF does not mention this approach, and its application within South Warwickshire needs further consideration. The SWLP technical evidence “Guide to existing housing densities in South Warwickshire” defines a 20-minute neighbourhood as achieving access to everyday services within a 10-minute walk or cycle each way. Greater flexibility should be applied to acknowledge the challenges of implementing the 20-minute neighbourhoods’ model in areas where everyday services are not available within such a short distance.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103438

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Emmerson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The design of new buildings in Stratford District over the past forty years has often been mediocre and I have heard planning officers in the past saying that judgements around building design are a personal matter and something that they cannot take into account when considering planning applications. I completely disagree with this view. I would like to see planning officers and developers paying more attention to matters such as the use of local materials, visual balance and proportion. I would hope that the design code can be used effectively and sensitively to ensure better design in the future.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103489

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 261 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103494

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 42 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103498

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 324 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103500

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 326 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103504

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Kineton Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 325 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103508

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that land south of Wellesbourne Road, Wellesbourne can meet these requirements.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103510

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 25 and highlight that site REFID: 232 can meet these requirements, as set out in the recently submitted outline planning application

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103687

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

More suitable to ground up designs in New Settlements for true 20 minute neighbourhoods.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103764

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Only realistically deliverable via new settlements for optimised design and real world delivery

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103827

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Claire Jones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Biodiversity should be the top priority- doesn’t matter if the area is attractive, it needs to be supporting nature and people to connect with nature

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 103977

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Potter

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In Principle yes but practically it is up to people's free will where they live and work.