Yes

ID sylw: 96445

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christina Deakin

Development on non-green belt land offers a more favourable approach to sustainable growth, respecting the principles of environmental preservation and community planning.

Other

ID sylw: 96751

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

ID sylw: 96966

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 97211

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Squab Hall Farm

Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes

Squab Hall Farm is a feasible and suitable location for growth. The SWLP should recognise this deliverability and allocate the Site for the outlined development.

No

ID sylw: 97596

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Anna Avino

Leamington has already exploded in the past five years. The roads are jammed, the services are overstretched and the vast housing developements and population explosion is changimg the character of the area and making it unpleasant. Infrastructure cannot cope with all the new 29,000 homes being concentrated in a few massive developments in the area particularly south Leamington and Whitnash which is gridlocked. These houses need to be fully dispersed across the whole of warwickshire with every town and village taking a handful of them. This woudl be a fairer, more sustainable appproach as the infratrusture wil alsways play catch-up.

Yes

ID sylw: 97665

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kate Murphy

Opportunity to create a sustainable neighbourhood with enhanced links to the train station . S106 funds would also be substantial to provide amenities and services.
Close to m40 and a46

Yes

ID sylw: 97822

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 97862

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs cynthia bettany

Again this site is in close proximity to infrastructure and work force, but it would impact on the views from Chesterton Mill and the heritage values of the Fosse Way.

Yes

ID sylw: 97883

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Tracey Hasnaoui

large non green belt area

Yes

ID sylw: 98215

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Teed

Does not include green belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 98302

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

n/a

Yes

ID sylw: 98421

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Wright

Support development on non-green belt land.

Yes

ID sylw: 98742

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 99004

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lynda McCarthy

This is an area suitable for develoment as it is close to infrastructure and not designated 'green belt' land

No

ID sylw: 99089

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Whitnash Town Council

we are against more urban sprawl

Yes

ID sylw: 99136

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Jones

Development of an area not containing green belt land.
Size of development opportunity.

No

ID sylw: 99196

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

There will be not enough access to GP surgeries.
There will not be enough access to hospitals.
There will not be enough school places. The local schools are already at capacity and have no space for development.
The increase in traffic will create more wear and tear on the roads, cause longer delays getting into Leamington and put more strain on parking facilities in Leamington.

No

ID sylw: 99308

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Phelps

This would swamp the historic village of Bishops Tachbrook and deprive it of the green space which separates it from Leamington; no nearby rail links

No

ID sylw: 99410

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

Yes

ID sylw: 99432

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Tibbles

Appears to be have mediocre service by existing Road Network, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments, but with some improvements in capacity and provision, might be suitable

No

ID sylw: 99500

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Whilst broadly supporting the objectives, this parcel of land is an elongated ribbon of differing character between its western and southern eastern ends, crossing District boundaries. It scores badly at 63.38 and has flooding and landscape issues that make it unusable for development consideration at the southeastern portion close to the hamlet of Chesterton. Furthermore, in terms of the landscape, this is the site of Chesterton Windmill a 17th century Grade 1 listed monument which is one of the premier archaeological features in the county. This location is also the site of many other archaeological features.

Yes

ID sylw: 99727

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

Large development potential of non green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 99784

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 99796

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Cooper

Will only add to local traffic congestion.

Yes

ID sylw: 99887

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 99901

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Eaton

Support required development on non green belt land

Yes

ID sylw: 100052

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Development should prioritise brownfield sites over Green Belt land. Urban and previously developed areas already have infrastructure in place, reducing pressure on roads, schools, and healthcare. These sites are closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using brownfield land prevents environmental damage, protects biodiversity, and preserves historic landscapes. It also helps maintain community identity by preventing urban sprawl. Additionally, brownfield areas are often better suited for flood mitigation. By focusing on these locations, new housing can be delivered responsibly without harming the countryside or overburdening local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 100061

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil Brooker

If more houses are needed this Location is more suitable for development than others in the district.

No

ID sylw: 100094

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Evan Bailey

I think SG11 extends far too far into the countryside. Perhaps the northern-most 10% of the area could be acceptable, but not the rest, and the area south of the Fosse Way should certainly not be developed.

Yes

ID sylw: 100282

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

New development should focus on previously developed sites, not destroy protected Green Belt land. Urban and repurposed areas already have infrastructure in place, preventing additional strain on roads, schools, and healthcare. These locations are also closer to transport links and jobs, making them more sustainable. Using non-Green Belt land prevents irreversible environmental harm, safeguards biodiversity, and preserves important landscapes. It also protects communities from urban sprawl and helps to prevent flooding. By focusing on these sites, new housing can be delivered in a responsible way—without sacrificing the countryside or placing unbearable pressure on already stretched local services.