BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG11 Question
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104623
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Dunning
Stop building sprawling car-dependent suburbia. You are killing people with these decisions. Cars kill people, stop making people have to get in their cars to get to places. Build high density walkable neighbourhoods with active travel infrastructure.
Paint is not cycling infrastructure.
Buses are bad public transport.
Don't build any detached houses.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104852
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Elizabeth Heath
This development does not take land out of greenbelt and therefore has a lower negative impact on biodiversity. It's also closer to existing infrastructure and services
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 104933
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Charlotte Holme
This could be a suitable site for development given existing development in the area. As long as the infrastructure is put in place to cope with additional traffic, give people local services, schools, health services etc
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 105228
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
South East of Whitnash Group – SG11 – NO OBJECTION
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 105555
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Hargie
SG09/SG10/SG11 because of the immediate connection to the M40 and as a logical continuation of the development of the land south of Leamington Spa and supported by the infrastructure already in place.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 105667
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Heynes
If substantial growth is to occur in Stratford, it should occur on the northern side due to better access to Stratford Parkway station, the strategic highway network, and existing employment. A relief road must be positioned on the southern side, linking the A34 with the A46, but proposals around the eastern side are not feasible. Additionally, growth should focus on new settlements near public transport interchanges, including railway stations and access to Birmingham Airport. Options around X1, X2, SG09, 10, 11, G1, SG13, 14, and B1 appear to be the most sensible.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106429
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Benjamin Lewitt
Objection2 Development on SG05The proposed development of SG05 would have severe negative impacts on local area.This land is designated as GreenBelt, intended2protect natural landscapes, prevent urban sprawl,&maintain clear separation between Lillington&Cubbington. Additionally,SG05 has poor access & an uneven terrain that is prone2significant flooding.
In contrast, SG09, SG10, SG11 are far more suitable alternatives. Located within 5miles of Cubbington, these sites lie outside the Green Belt, have better access to road networks,&do not suffer from flooding issues.
Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances, supported by clear&compelling evidence.There is no justification for changing these boundaries 2allow development onSG05.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 106918
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Historic England
POTENTIAL OBJECTION: Site Includes the Windmill Hill Roman settlement at Chesterton and development would cause substantial harm to significance of the asset.
Development would cause harm to significance and setting of Chesterton Windmill LB (GI).
Impact on significance of Mallory Court RPG (GII) & views out should be considered in any assessment.
Recommend: HIA prior to allocation. However, we would prefer the south-western parcel not to be carried forward into the Reg 19 Plan.
HE recommends that the proposed allocation should be reduced to only include land north-west of Barnwell Farm. This will reduce harm to below ground archaeology of SM and surrounding area and reduce harm in the setting of the heritage assets.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107047
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: National Gas Transmission
Asiant : Avison Young
We have identified one or more proposed development sites as being crossed or in close proximity to National Gas Transmission assets.
Details of the sites affecting National Gas Transmission assets are provided below.
Gas Transmission Pipeline, route: CHURCHOVER COMP TEE TOHONEYBOURNE
Gas Transmission Pipeline, route: CHURCHOVER TO WORMINGTON
Without appropriate acknowledgement of the National Gas Transmission assets present within the site, these policies should not be considered effective as they cannot be delivered as proposed; unencumbered by the constraints posed by the presence of National Gas Transmission infrastructure.
We propose that future Local Plan policies in respect of the affected proposed allocations and new settlements include a policy strand that incorporates wording to
the following effect:
“The development will demonstrate a clear strategy for responding to the National Gas Transmission high-pressure gas pipelines present within the site which provides evidence on how the National Gas Transmission Design Guide and Principles have been applied at
the masterplanning stage and how the impact of the assets has been reduced through good design.”
It is requested that this wording is either incorporated into site specific policies for the ten affected sites, or included within the general policy text if site-specific policies are not
incorporated in later versions of the emerging South Warwickshire Local Plan.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107055
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: National Grid Electricity Distribution (South West) PLC
Asiant : Lucy White Planning Limited
This potential location is affected by a 132kV overhead electricity line, strategically important utility infrastructure serving Warwick and Royal Leamington Spa and the wider area. NGED does not object to development, providing this infrastructure is safeguarded. Early consideration of the line through the masterplanning process is critical to ensure the line can be appropriately incorporated into planned development.
Proposals for major development will rely on adequate capacity within the national grid to meet the increased demand for electricity. Please ensure early engagement with NGED to establish existing capacity and any enhancements, including sub-stations, required to accommodate the planned growth.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107107
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Carol Regan
SG11 South East of Whitnash Group - Support.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107422
Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Moreton Morrell Parish Council
No objection
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 107721
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alex Carbutt Todd
SG11 is sprawling and crosses local authority boundaries (as does X2). There is limited access with no A-road to the western section. Both 716 and 612 have limited access, mainly only currently via Harbury Lane. It is difficult not to foresee development of this area causing additional congestion issues around Heathcote and Whitnash, along Harbury Lane and the Fosse Way.
This area is susceptible to flooding. X2 and SG11 have substantial areas which sit within flood Zone 3. Particularly SG11.
Almost all land within the X2 and SG11 areas is currently productive farmland with nutrient-rich clay soil.
Overall very little of SG11 or X2 is urban or brownfield as stated as desirable in the Spatial Growth Strategy.
I would like it to be noted that our land has been promoted for adoption without our consent by Terrano Land & Development, and therefore we are not represented by Terrano, nor can we be treated as a single party along with the other parcels under their promotion, further reducing the cohesion of 612, SG11, and X2.