BASE HEADER
Strategic Growth Location SG12 Question
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91013
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Julian Brown
Agree. Good to expand Southam and provide employment opportunities as well as housing. My only reservation is what type of businesses and employment can be attracted to these sites given the distance to good infrastructure.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91031
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Rodney Hicken
Well connected current growth area
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91119
Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs liz jackson
outside greenbelt
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91421
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr
The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Long Itchington Quarry LWS and River Itchen PLWS
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 91934
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea
This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92071
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Robin Broughton
Makes sense
Local amenities and roads can cope
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92176
Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson
The infrastructure will not match the schooling, medical, transport,etc needs which are already under immense pressure.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92302
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr James Wilkinson
Inappropriate as lock of facilities and loss of countryside
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92307
Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council
Southam has already taken substantial development and lacks a rail station therefore all of SG12 would be overdevelopment and put excessive pressure on local services.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92904
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy
Not Green Belt. Better for sustainability than other sites, close to Southam centre
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 92957
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Momcilovic
This development would meet existing infrastructure and least impact on the environment
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93103
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Waters
Some limited growth could take place especially as HS2 construction has caused some physical growth already and there may be opportunities to utilise space "left over" when HS2 works are complete
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93109
Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Naomi McAinsh
The warwickshire plan for housing can be done by not using greenbelt and this has to be the chosen option -otherwise the repercussions to biodiversity will be devastating
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93434
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis
Southam is a largely self-contained small town and, as such, can accomode reasonable expansion, provided local amenities are expanded to provide for more people.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93627
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bennett
These sites are very logical and to my mind appropriately manageable additional housing for the town of Southam, well supported by the existing transport infrastructure and community services there.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 93945
Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley
Looks fairly well balanced expansion
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94326
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: mr william tansey
Further infrastructure and facilities development will also required (cycle routes, schools, shops, medical centres and recreational facilities) which will further boost the economy in an area with significant and existing close links to major transport infrastructure and help improve the ideology of 20 minute communities. There is an opportunity to improve green credentials and sustainable transport in this area by preventing unnecessary journeys to other larger developed areas such as leamington and warwick.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94433
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Belinda Brown
This is non-green belt land and therefore a much more appropriate potential development site. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites, including this one, available!
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94540
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr John Steen
Not Green Belt land
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 94726
Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025
Ymatebydd: David Gosling
we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95163
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Steel
Southam doesn't need developing any more. Many people have brought here for the quiet location with less people around. If more houses are built please take into account Southam high street is not ready for this. The high street needs a butchers, bakery, decent café with fresh bakes. The leisure centre in Southam is tiny now let alone adding more people into the area.
Flying Fields site = disabled / blind / pushchair users currently can't safely access Southam town due to no wide safe paths and no zebra crossing on Ring road near Daventry Road. Also no tactile pavement.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95176
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Wilson
Seems to be the right level of development for the infrastructure.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95425
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy
Good for sustainability as near to town centre of Southam minimising car use. Not Green Belt
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95550
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Patricia Holliday
I think some of the smaller areas within the town limits would be ideal, but the larger areas on the perimeter are valuable Green Belt which should be maintained for future generations to enjoy.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95556
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke
Development in this location is adjacent to pre-existing development and can be served by existing local facilities
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95707
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Watt
I object to site 64 due to the proximity of The Holy Well
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95731
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Pete Middleton
The location should be kept as commercial as it is now and not housing. Jobs and services are important in the town centre.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 95782
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Whilst broadly supporting the strategic objectives, I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96032
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Chilton
Southam and surrounding area has good transport connections and the road potential for more infrastructure upgrades in the future
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 96200
Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Sinclair
Would provide modest expansion of southam which has adequate infrastructure in place including schools (primary and secondary)
Non green belt land