No

ID sylw: 86028

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Rhys-Taylor

Proposal is to close to the Holy well area. Not enough infrastructure in Southam to cope with expansion. River floods very often by the Holy Well. The fields either side of the Holy well are one of the only areas in Southam used for dog walkers. The holy well area is a huge historical site for Southam which brings lots of visitors. There are other areas of Southam that are more suitable for housing development such as by the bypass/Daventry Road area.

No

ID sylw: 86029

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Tristan Taylor

The fields to either side of the holy well walk are of historical significance and bring lots of visitors to the town. The proposed build from welsh road west is marked to go all the way down to the river, thus disturbing the natural spring which feeds the holy well and could therefore destroy the feature. The holy well walk is an area of outstanding natural beauty and an important area for the mental and physical wellbeing of Southam residents` and pets therefore building here would ruin the aesthetic of the area. I implore you to reconsider this proposed area.

No

ID sylw: 86030

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Caroline Piper

Increase in traffic, pollution and congestion. Loss of amenity land.

Yes

ID sylw: 86500

Derbyniwyd: 27/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs C Dempster

Spread out the development

Other

ID sylw: 86559

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

There is a danger that developing Southam could encourage this to merge into Leamington in future

Yes

ID sylw: 86727

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Claire Whitehouse

Could give boost to Southam. Facilities are good, transport networks etc are good. Good for local businesses and might encourage new ones.

Yes

ID sylw: 86812

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY

Southam is already a very built up area but has the infrastructure and employment in the area.

No

ID sylw: 87004

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Whittaker

The developments to the west of Southam on Leamington road and Welsh road, is not suitable for development as it has inadequate infrastructure and on/around land of historical importance. Planning permission on Leamington Road has been previously refused. I strongly object to these developments.

Yes

ID sylw: 87034

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

south has good road links but it will need facilities updating and new schools etc.

Yes

ID sylw: 87254

Derbyniwyd: 07/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Howard Collerson

Na

Yes

ID sylw: 87346

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Sustainable development

No

ID sylw: 87527

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure. HS2 causing massive disruption to life and the environment. We do not need anything more.

Yes

ID sylw: 87993

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Not greenbelt

Yes

ID sylw: 88000

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Ye as its not in greenbelt

Yes

ID sylw: 88137

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Anne Parry

No objection

Yes

ID sylw: 88172

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG12 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place

Other

ID sylw: 88203

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Richard Clarke

The proposed development areas in Southam lack a sustainable community vision and would severely impact residents, even with just 25% of them utilised. The plans would almost double the town's size without addressing necessary infrastructure. Development along the Stowe Valley flood plain threatens attractive green spaces and risks flooding new homes. Additionally, the inclusion of Wood St car park, a vital community asset for local businesses, and the Factory Shop, which serves an important role, would further harm the town's vitality.

Yes

ID sylw: 88245

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Absolutely 100% - logical infill and good for the town to bring business and housing. Only concern I have is the transport links to encourage businesses other than "min. wage" "box shifter type business" to locate there.

Yes

ID sylw: 88628

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 88957

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Nigel Rock

I do not agree with this cluster being included in the plan as set out.

No

ID sylw: 89303

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Rebecca Mitchell

- Unacceptable loss of the only car park in the centre of Southam, which will undoubtedly have an impact on local businesses, Including banks, post office, shops, pharmacy,etc. How do you expect the people from the villages around Southam to get to the centr and park? In Stockton, for example, there isn't even a pavement to walk to Southam, therefore we are forced to take the car.

- Where is the plan to increase local services ? You are doubling Southam size, what about the GPs? And the NHS dentists? Schools? Police? Etc etc

No

ID sylw: 89352

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Shillcock

Southam has doubled in size and its character is now being lost. Whilst I support some limited development, this should be to the North West and South West of the town as it provides better links and accessibility to amenities/schools. The site to the North East is totally unacceptable due to:- flooding at the bottom of the site and development will make this worse; its non-connectivity to the town with the by-pass causing major safety issues for pedestrians; traffic flow accessibility into this site and it was taken out of the last SDC development plan as a recognised green space.

No

ID sylw: 89430

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

Southam has has unprecedented growth in the last few years - no rail access and growth has been overwhelmingly dependent on car and road - infrastructure has been lacking - Wood Street car park as development is unacceptable and would affect the vibrancy of the town.

Yes

ID sylw: 89522

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

Non green belt land so get building!

Yes

ID sylw: 89730

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

Yes

ID sylw: 89787

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Julian Sanders

Access to good road connections to the north and south of the area.
Local employment opportunities
Good rail links for those commuting further afield - Banbury, Oxford, London, Birmingham
Helps to the pressure off Stratford Upon Avon of increased traffic congestion, pollution and urban sprawl
Gives opportunity to build new schools, amenities and infrastructure

No

ID sylw: 90082

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson

Long Itchinghton Quarry LWS and River Itchen PLWS

No

ID sylw: 90328

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Julia Gibson

N/A

Other

ID sylw: 90385

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

I do not know this area well enough to offer an informed opinion

Yes

ID sylw: 90427

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

Reasons:
1. Good job opportunities
2. Good existing road connections
3. HS2 could offer links to other regions
4. Reduce congestion in Stratford upon Avon
5. Housing here likely to have least impact on environment and preserve greenbelt land