Yes

ID sylw: 100436

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Aimee Carter

Appropriate and matches with overall strategy is SG09, SG10 and SG11 are used fore development

Yes

ID sylw: 100610

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Residents Concerned for Kenilworth South

Support the development of a new settlement on non-green belt land, with the space to provide a large number of houses plus additional amenities to support new residents. Rather than extending existing settlements with already overstretched, or at capacity, amenities such as schools, doctors, dentists, etc
Road infrastructure will be designed to manage the increased volume of traffic, rather than putting additional vehicles on roads in existing settlements which haven't been designed to manage the new volume.

Yes

ID sylw: 101038

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Melissa Gillone

This site is significantly better than the BW site, as it lacks heritage constraints and does not contribute to the same level of urban sprawl.

Yes

ID sylw: 101695

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Bowen

The site has access to great infrastructure and is close to places of employment.

Yes

ID sylw: 101785

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Perry

Again Motorway/dual carriageway system in place.
Schools in place.
Infrastructure in place.

No

ID sylw: 101786

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Janet Neale

This area is already over populated. significant roadworks have already take place to supposedly meet the need of the growth from the existing Warwick District Local Plan and yet the system is still broken.

Yes

ID sylw: 101801

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Debbie Perry

I support a new settlement at Leamingto Spa/Whitnash because transport infrastructure is in plac. School schools in the area and accessible employment opportunities across Midlands via road and rail network. Leamington has a number of national "headquarters" attracting workers and consumers boosting the economy and local businesses.

No

ID sylw: 101827

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Site X2, covering 324 hectares, could accommodate 6,480 homes but faces major challenges. Ranked 4th in the SA, it lacks infrastructure, sustainable transport and proximity to essential services. It impacts priority habitats, heritage assets and natural resources, sitting on mineral safeguarding areas and flood-prone land. The HELAA flags multiple ownerships with no clear intent to sell, making it undevelopable under NPPF guidelines. X2 is poorly located, reliant on car travel and near over-capacity roads. Without infrastructure solutions, the SWLP risks failing soundness tests at Regulation 19. Increased traffic could cause severe congestion at key junctions, creating gridlock.

No

ID sylw: 102250

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jenny Bevan

Site X2 is unsuitable for development and contradicts the SWLP’s evidence-led strategy. It lies in Growth Strategy Priority Area 3, lacks infrastructure, public transport and accessibility to employment, making it unsustainable. The HELAA flags multiple ownership issues, with only 47% of the land available, making delivery unrealistic.

X2 fails national policy tests, being in an unsustainable location with flood risks, priority habitats and significant heritage impacts, including a Scheduled Monument. It is the worst-performing site for natural resources, overlapping three Mineral Safeguarding Areas. X2 is unjustified, ineffective and inconsistent with sustainable development principles.

No

ID sylw: 102265

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Niall Shimmin

Will overload existing infrastructure.
Road network not suitable.
No amenities.
Poor public transport links.

No

ID sylw: 102693

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Judy Steele

Infracstructure needs for this settlement would make it impractical and would have severe impact on existing housing

No

ID sylw: 102880

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Diana Taulbut

Whoever put X2 in the plan is obviously completely unaware that Chesterton Windmill is one of the area's favourite free visitor attractions, whose setting in the countryside is much photographed and appreciated. It is not going to look good in the middle of a housing estate. Furthermore, there is a scheduled ancient monument in X2 and the surrounding area is protected regarding Roman remains (Chesterton fort), and its landscape should also be protected. Is the "desktop planning" so poor that no-one can work that one out?!

Yes

ID sylw: 102929

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jem Brown

I agree, of all the options, this one and option BW are more suitable. X2 has notably fewer habitats than say F2, F3 and G3 although small amounts of distinctive grassland. It is 4km from Leamington Spa station. Although there is no green belt around Leamington there is a high risk that this option would tend to considerably increase the sprawl of Leamington Spa and is likely become joined to Leamington over time since there is only a 1km buffer to Leamington outskirts.

No

ID sylw: 102990

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting

Harbury Lane and the Fosseway are single carriageway roads running along the northern and eastern boundaries of this site. Harbury Lane is prone to flooding with water run off from the land immediately to the south of Harbury Lane. This flood risk would be worsened with new settlement development.

There are significant archaeological remains in the area on the land to the south of Harbury Lane and either side of the Fosse Way. It is a sensitive area.

There is currently Solar Farm construction on 234 acres on part of X2 (Chesterton Fields Farm) south east quadrant of X2.

Other

ID sylw: 103083

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Warwick - Longbridge (STW) Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment works has medium capacity and high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a medium/high risk location, there is some capacity however in order to accommodate growth, infrastructure upgrades will be required and we would need to work closely to understand build timelines, in order to plan accordingly.

Yes

ID sylw: 103617

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Wall

Ideal

Yes

ID sylw: 103748

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Deborah Carter

By prioritising sustainable, non-Green Belt sites, housing can be delivered responsibly—without destroying the countryside, harming biodiversity, or overwhelming local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 103788

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Micheal Dylan

This site has good transport links to surrounding areas and good job opportunities locally in Leamington, it is also commutable to Stratford upon Avon, Warwick and Coventry. This site could be good along side site X2 in attracting additional amenaties

Yes

ID sylw: 103801

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Jones

A new settlement on non-green belt land should be the first consideration for development.
New Settlements are preferable to spatial growth areas, as the appropriate infrastructure and amenities will be provided, rather than adding additional volume to already over stretched existing facilities in spatial growth areas.
Development without the removal of greenbelt should be the priority.

No

ID sylw: 104026

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Haycock

X1, X2: Considered undevelopable due to multiple ownership issues and lack of infrastructure. Only 14% of X1 and 47% of X2 have been put forward for development, making them both unviable.

X1, X2: Fail key NPPF tests, particularly in transport accessibility, infrastructure provision, and realistic deliverability.
Conclusion:
X1 and X2 should be discounted as they fail on sustainability, deliverability, and infrastructure grounds. The Regulation 19 SWLP must provide more explicit justifications and mitigation plans to be considered sound.

No

ID sylw: 104027

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kay Haycock

X1, X2: Considered undevelopable due to multiple ownership issues and lack of infrastructure. Only 14% of X1 and 47% of X2 have been put forward for development, making them both unviable.

X1, X2: Fail key NPPF tests, particularly in transport accessibility, infrastructure provision, and realistic deliverability.
Conclusion:
X1 and X2 should be discounted as they fail on sustainability, deliverability, and infrastructure grounds. The Regulation 19 SWLP must provide more explicit justifications and mitigation plans to be considered sound.

No

ID sylw: 104100

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Louis haycock

X1, X2: Considered undevelopable due to multiple ownership issues and lack of infrastructure. Only 14% of X1 and 47% of X2 have been put forward for development, making them both unviable.

X1, X2: Fail key NPPF tests, particularly in transport accessibility, infrastructure provision, and realistic deliverability.
Conclusion:
X1 and X2 should be discounted as they fail on sustainability, deliverability, and infrastructure grounds. The Regulation 19 SWLP must provide more explicit justifications and mitigation plans to be considered sound.

No

ID sylw: 104121

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kenneth Chitty

this area is already over developed and present numerous transport difficulties coupled with lack of facilities.

Yes

ID sylw: 104141

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Nicola Sawle

non green belt fits the M40 corridor and would support housing to the nearby industry

Yes

ID sylw: 104480

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Phill Levy

Close proximity to the M40, and good links to the main station at Leamington.

Other

ID sylw: 104502

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Campaign to Protect Rural England - Warwickshire

X2 Land south of Whitnash west of Fosse Way: This is a a very large area of farmland, 324ha. A new settlement is not supported; see instead response on SG11 Land SE of Whitnash. The land between Harbury Lane and the railway is the 1930s Leamington Airfield and includes a scrapyard and a container storage base. It lies in the area of Whitnash Town Council. An urban extension here is possible, though not extending as far south-eastwards as the Fosse Way. Much more work is needed to examine this; one factor would be the future of the golf course.

No

ID sylw: 104592

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Ailsa Chambers

The lack of transport accessibility and infrastructure makes this option unviable. Development on this site would present significant environmental and heritage issues which cannot be mitigated. Too much of our local natural habitats have already been lost and it would be environmentally irresponsible to lose more. Bishops Tachbrook’s village characteristics will be lost forever if the sprawl of development between the village and Leamington does not stop.

Yes

ID sylw: 104603

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Amy Bambridge

It makes sense to develop around Leamington, which affords easier transport access to shops, recreation and hospitals. Leamington town centre is also in desperate need of economic rejuvenation.

Yes

ID sylw: 104951

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Susan Hood

Close to transport road links (M40), plus rail (West Coast mainline and Chiltern). Adjacent to existing urban areas. Local wildlife sites not impacted.

Yes

ID sylw: 105046

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr William Langstone

It seems to me that this would be a good location to create a new settlement, being close to other recent development in Whitnash, and being served by the Fosse Way which has had major work done in that section recently, providing good traffic management links.

Any green belt land developed can feel like a loss, and I spent much time in my childhood around here. While there would be disruptions they don't seem unacceptable.