BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Stratford upon Avon District Council
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the How to Have Your Say chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 88778
Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
If additional land comes forward relating to new settlements or growth areas it should mean that a corresponding amount of land is removed from elsewhere.
Gysy sites should be carved out of any large allocations and not be free standing so they can contribute to and benefit from new infrastructure
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG15 Question
ID sylw: 88974
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Need for strategic gap between University site and airfield and edge of village
No development east of A429
No development of existing allotments site north of Kineton Road
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 88976
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
In housing priority should be given to accommodating local needs - particularly that evidenced by up to date housing surveys
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the How to Have Your Say chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 88977
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
if additional land is identifies adjacent to existing allocations there should be an opportunity to substitute it for land already allocated. It should not be additional.
Land for gypsies should be part of large allocations to ensure minorities have easy access to schools and other amenities. It should not be in isolated locations where is easy to be socially excluded.
Renewable energy infrastructure should be integrated with all new development - on houses and commercial buildings in order to minimise the need to use agricultral and other land.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Introduction? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 88979
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
We are being forced to take a lot of growth by the Government. It is essential that this is accommodated as sensitively as possible
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG16 Question
ID sylw: 88988
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Airfield for retention of airfield and associated development not warehousing
Only one replacement dwelling west of Loxley Lane
No development south of Loxley Road with the exception of a small area east of the drive to Chadley House
No development on the household tip east of Loxley Road
Any development as an extension of the Grange Estate to be limited with a very substantial landscape buffer created to the south and east of any development
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 88990
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
If the new Standard number of houses is to be accepted thee is no capacity to take development from Birmingham or Coventry. If we are forced to take additional houses for these cities these authorities must fund the total cost of infrastructure to serve the development
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 88991
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
It is essential that every development however small is evaluated for the collective burden it places on infrastructure. Previously small developments have not been considered significant in highway capacity term or the provision of education, health and sports facilities. That has lead to significant overloading and a significant reduction in the quality of life for existing residents. Any new development must contribute to an improvement in the quality of life.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 88992
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
There is substantial scope for including windfall sites. For instance Ryan Hill house on Warwick Road is to become available with the rationalisation of the NFU. New land should only be released where these is an identified and not theoretical need.
The plan should support the development of quality employment in key sectors and should not facilitate warehousing and storage particularly in the motorway corridor
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question E1
ID sylw: 88993
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Subject to the provision of infrastructure BEFORE additional development here
