BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Stratford upon Avon District Council
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question X1
ID sylw: 88996
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
The gap between Wellesbourne and Leamington is extremely important. This settlement particularly if it was implemented with SG9 and 10 would extend Leamington southwards to an unacceptable degree.
If a new motorway junction is to be produced associated with this settlement it should have no connection south west of the motorway. This would only introduce more traffic towards Wellesbourne. A link road from here to Stratford would be expensive, intrusive and completely undesirable. Much better to improve Longbridge still further and upgrade the A46 westwards.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question BW
ID sylw: 88997
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
This is a prominent greenbelt area and its development would destroy the integrity of Bearley and Wilmcote villages. The infrastructure here is wholly inadequate. There is an insufficiently wide buffer zone between the northern edge of Stratford and the new settlement. It would almost form a line of ribbon development.
It would put intolerable pressure on Birmingham Road Stratford
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 89001
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
With increased standard housing numbers and reduced numbers for adjoining authorities there should be les need to accommodate overspill. IF we are forced to take overspill there must be agreement that the authority exporting their growth pays the whole cost of additional infrastructure necessary
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 89002
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
All developments must meet the infrastructure requirements that they generate regardless of size
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?
ID sylw: 89004
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
This section is out of date some of the road improvements mentioned have already been provided (Portobello Crossroads) The provision of infrastructure is crucial to the success of the plan. The Infrastructure plan is awaited and more comment can be made once the proposals contained in that plan are known.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?
ID sylw: 89009
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
In view of the scale of the development we are being forced to accommodate the preservation of the green belt cannot be regarded as an overriding consideration. If that is done there will be unacceptable pressure on the area of the plan immediately to the south of the green belt
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 89011
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Densities must be increased in urban areas in order to accommodate housing numbers and minimise the loss of green fields. Higher density developments are more sustainable. In high density areas where there is good public transport the requirement to provide parking spaces should be relaxed
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?
ID sylw: 89014
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Certainly in an urban context. But in rural areas using brownfield land for housing sometimes leads to incongruous and detrimental housing development, sporadic and isolated from facilities or services. Land that had been neglected or wilfully allowed to become derelict should not automatically be considered for development.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 89015
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
Vitally important that all new development is built to highest specification and will not need retrofitting in the future
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 89016
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council
We have a general shortage of low cost smaller houses and there is a need for this to be rectified in the plan. Preference should be given to schemes that provided housing at below market value and addrees the needs identified in local surveys.
There should be a general presumption against substantially extending smaller houses in rural areas. Many small houses and cottages suitable for local people have been bought up by people from outside the area and extended into very large dwellings often in unsustainable locations generating unacceptable levels of additional traffic,
