Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 122

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91575

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

Representation Summary:

It is essential that this policy is implemented

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91701

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Representation Summary:

Sensible

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91703

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Representation Summary:

Sensible

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91785

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

Representation Summary:

N/A

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91859

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hanno Kirner

Representation Summary:

Rail needs to take more stresses off the road

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91904

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Representation Summary:

Greater emphasis should be given on creating new railway stations to improve transportation links for employment, reducing both carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92061

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Oliver Grice

Representation Summary:

Freight. Off the roads if possible. Autonomous electric small deliveries at night.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92224

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Representation Summary:

There doesn't appear to be enough emphasis on creating rail transport links, or dealing with the miserable traffic congestion in Stratford upon Avon

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92427

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Representation Summary:

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve transport links, reduce carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92494

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Representation Summary:

policy requires revision.
The enable and promotion must be "locked in" before one brick is even laid.
Policy a bit vague and easily got around. Every house should have fast electric charging points. Either you are serious or you are not.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92631

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Yates

Representation Summary:

Public EV charging points need to be made available

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92643

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Representation Summary:

Not if it involves development in green belt

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92690

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Nigel Briggs

Representation Summary:

The draft policy lacks ambition. Active measures should be introduced to facilitate reduction in the need for freight by supporting 'farm to fork' and similar initiatives. Demonstrably safe cycle routes would enable journeys of more than 10km to be achieved by most people with direct payback in improved community health.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92819

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Representation Summary:

I feel that current proposals do not go far enough to reduce pressure/congestion on roads and better support for rail infrastructure is necessary.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92847

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

Representation Summary:

I do not agree with this policy as it fails to prioritize sustainable transport. There is not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations, which are essential for reducing car dependency. Without strong public transport options, traffic congestion will worsen, leading to increased carbon emissions and poorer air quality. To support sustainable growth, we must invest in rail infrastructure and alternative transport solutions. Ignoring these factors will only create long-term environmental and traffic issues, making this policy ineffective in addressing future challenges.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92993

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Representation Summary:

No, there is not enough emphasis about creating railway improvements and transport links for employment.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93028

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

Representation Summary:

I presume there are experts who advise on these matters

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93093

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Martina Hunt

Representation Summary:

there is not sufficient emphasis on on creating new railway stations and parkways to improve transportation links for employment, reducing carbon emissions, and traffic congestion, which is appalling in Stratford.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93672

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

Representation Summary:

I disagree with this policy as it does not sufficiently prioritize sustainable transport. The lack of emphasis on new railway stations fails to address the need to reduce car dependency. Without improved public transport options, traffic congestion will increase, leading to higher carbon emissions and worsening air quality. Sustainable growth requires investment in rail infrastructure and alternative transport solutions. Failing to consider these factors will result in long-term environmental and traffic problems, making this policy ineffective in tackling future challenges.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93849

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Zbigniew Franczuk

Representation Summary:

Stratford has little new job opportunities as most large companies have left Stratford or closed after takeover
By another company
This makes one think who are these homes are built for as extra homes put extra pressure on the poor infrastructure.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94082

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

Representation Summary:

There is not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve transportation links for employment, as well as reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94114

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Representation Summary:

Far more focus should be placed on providing new rail links in order to meet emissions targets and alleviate congestion.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94125

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

Representation Summary:

There should be a much stronger emphasis on the development of rail (including new stations) and pressuring local transport providers to move to electric or hybrid buses.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94382

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

Representation Summary:

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations. This would improve transportation links and reduce carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94527

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian McCallum

Representation Summary:

It is obvious that since large scale developments have happened in South Warwickshire, along with HS2, that the amount of heavy Lorry’s has increased. This should be connected to the state of the roads deteriorating during the same time frame.

I would like to suggest that it is responsibility, that when planning permission is given to build anything, the developer is made responsible for filling in and making good any damaged roads within a certain perimeter of that development. I will leave it to you to agree how far that perimeter should be.

I can not see why tax payers should have to pay for the damage done by heavy trucks that developers use to make themselves richer.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94888

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford-upon-Avon Town Transport Group

Representation Summary:

The proliferation of small and frequent delivery vans to domestic properties would be greatly reduced by a delivery hub.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94941

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Representation Summary:

NO - not enough prioity given to creating new rail stations and links.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94993

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Stuart Mace

Representation Summary:

Active travel opens up additional costs for the local authorities to cover in order to ensure those routes are safe at all times of the day and in all seasons. This necessitates: clear signposts, streetlighting, robust segregation from other traffic, regular street sweeping, gritting, swift repair of potholes and removal of debris.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95011

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Darren Downes

Representation Summary:

There will be minimal uptake of rail. Most people moving to the area come from the south and will remain in those higher paying jobs and commute by car - as Wilmcote and Bearly stations will be utterly impractical in terms of getting to Oxford, Bucks, etc......

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 95038

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

Representation Summary:

Traffic problems is a constant stranglehold in Stratford so this is only going to get worse, and don't be counting on electric vehicles as an offset as sales have been dropping across the country. Increased spending on the rail network with links to London is what is required.