Yes

Representation ID: 95230

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

Travel plans should be meaningful, deliverable and enforceable. The current trend is for travel plans to describe what might happen in an ideal world e.g. car sharing

No

Representation ID: 95319

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

The proposals to date just appear to pay lip service for need for environmental considerations. Focus should be on the new solutions/links rather than piling more pressure on existing over-burdened links. Havent seen much of a transport assessment referred to in the draft policy.

No

Representation ID: 95629

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Davis

There is not enough emphasis on new railway stations to improve links for employment, reducing traffic congestion and pollution.

Yes

Representation ID: 95770

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes Western

Agent: Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

No

Representation ID: 95861

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr UDAYA EEDUPUGANTI

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve transportation links for employment

Other

Representation ID: 95883

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

The work of the Local Planning Authority and the Highways Authority requires much better co-ordination in relation to the highway capacity needed to service developments both individually and collectively. Some highway capacity issues are unavoidable because of old historical layouts but others stem from poor integration between land use planning and transport planning.
The highway infrastructure required for new developments should be installed upfront not after the development has taken place.

Yes

Representation ID: 95959

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes. Employment designated sites in Local Centres need to be protected to encourage local businesses and hence reduce road traffic use by encouraging the workforce to walk/cycle to work as the employment will be within the settlement.

Yes

Representation ID: 96353

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam Town, District and County elected representatives support this Policy Direction.

Yes

Representation ID: 96514

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

Employment designated sites in Local Centres need to be protected to encourage local businesses and hence reduce road traffic use by encouraging the workforce to walk/cycle to work as the employment will be within the settlement.

Other

Representation ID: 96878

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

The provision of appropriate infrastructure in settlements E1, B1 and X2 would present fewer challenges and less cost than in BW where traffic movement to and from the settlement would cause pollution, disruption to local communities and congestion on local roads. Electric vehicles will not provide a solution for the foreseeable future.

Yes

Representation ID: 97058

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 97084

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

Yes, employment sites are needed in local centres to reduce travel and make it sustainable.

No

Representation ID: 97149

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

No, there is not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve travel links for employment, reducing congestion and air pollution

Yes

Representation ID: 97201

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 97277

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Squab Hall Farm

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Other

Representation ID: 97777

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Development at BW would result in considerable vehicle movement causing pollution, congestion on surrounding roads and disruption to local communities. Electric vehicles will not solve this for the foreseeable future. Settlement sites such as E1, B1 and X2 would be more suitable in presenting less challenge and cost.

No

Representation ID: 97879

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Not enough emphasis on creating new railway stations to improve
transportation links for employment, reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion. Travelling by road is very inefficient and doesn’t promote growth for the economy compared to rail or bus where more people can travel at once with minimal environmental impact.

Other

Representation ID: 97889

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

I hope the idea of re-opening a rail /tram link between Honeybourne and Stratford via long Marstonwill be seriously considered.
I also think that more consideration should be given to the known consequences of improving traffic flows by road building. This encourages more people and freight to travel further, when we now need to be investigating ways of reducing road travel by making it possible to satisfy more of our needs from and within the local area or by using public transport.

No

Representation ID: 97976

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Careless

Not enough on building new train stations, which would support with easing traffic contention.

Other

Representation ID: 98003

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Fox

This is good but clearly not been applied in thinking to the ratings of the various options.
And selecting sites due to proximity to low capacity Diesel train routes in not appropriate - locations need to be selected that they minimise distance travelled as well - with connectivity to major transport corridors being important - eg M40 and North / South major train routes - not just North to Birmingham

Yes

Representation ID: 98125

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Other

Representation ID: 98579

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Holly Farm Business Park

Agent: The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Further employment development at Holly Farm Business Park would be consistent with the requirements of this policy.

No

Representation ID: 98610

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

There needs to be priority on creating new railway links to improve transportation for employment, reducing carbon emissions and traffic congestion.

Yes

Representation ID: 98634

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

We support an approach that aligns with NPPF Paragraph 118, so that the likely impacts of developments on road travel can be adequately assessed. This will ensure significant development is focussed on the most sustainable locations, where the need to travel has been minimised, and a genuine choice of transport modes have been considered. Indeed, the accompanying Travel Plan and Transport Statement should effectively demonstrate this, to ensure development occurs in the most sustainable and accessible locations. This will support development that promotes active travel, adapts to climate change and addresses health inequalities.

Yes

Representation ID: 98937

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Liberal Democrat Group (Stratford District councillors)

I agree with the approach

Other

Representation ID: 99678

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Bedford

Please stop heavy traffic using Clopton Bridge

Yes

Representation ID: 100167

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

Good in principle.

No

Representation ID: 100432

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

There needs to be more emphasis on developing new public transport infrastructure such as railway stations and light railway.

No

Representation ID: 100535

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Stephen Draper

The location of CI settlement is incompatible with the 33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight.

Yes

Representation ID: 101088

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The policy direction is generally welcomed. When wording the detailed related policies, a level of flexibility should be afforded with a positively worded approach to support active and low-carbon transport journeys.

Policies should be supportive of sites that can accommodate sustainable transport options. This approach not only adheres to the NPPF but also fosters a cohesive integration of transport and land use planning, promoting sustainable growth and community well-being.