Yes

Representation ID: 86012

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kate Harris

All parties should be expected to follow this policy approach

Yes

Representation ID: 86125

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86700

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

But - Make it stronger.

Yes

Representation ID: 86761

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mrs Linda Dane

The plan needs a policy on protecting/providing wildlife corridors

No

Representation ID: 86946

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

Protect local nature - don't build on it

Other

Representation ID: 87060

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

This must be part of any building from the start, intense surveys carried out and plans for how any disruption to nature will be mitigated. This also needs to be inspected by the council and fines/legal action taken where housing companies do not fulfil there promises.

Yes

Representation ID: 87096

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

This policy challenges some of your growth areas like sg01 which covers a large area of green land and runs into the kenilworth to bale all common green way… the policy needs to more effectively applied to your plans please.

Yes

Representation ID: 87429

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87603

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88542

Received: 16/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kathryn Lawry Kennedy

As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However, LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy
(https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf )

Yes

Representation ID: 88800

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Erin Williams

Yes. As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However, LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy

Yes

Representation ID: 88846

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88868

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucy Hartley

good

Yes

Representation ID: 89093

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89171

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

but the green belt land should not be built on regardless, then there is not a need for a local nature recovery strategy

Yes

Representation ID: 89219

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Suzanna Hughes

biodiversity that already exists should be enhanced, we shouldn't be taking it away in areas it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

Yes

Representation ID: 89281

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Having developments provide areas of enhanced biodiversity as part of their site and connecting existing ecological niches together is a great idea.

Yes

Representation ID: 89428

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Hayles

n/a

Yes

Representation ID: 89572

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

Make sure this is hardwired into the plan and use recommendations from the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust - https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf

No

Representation ID: 89641

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Simon Cook

Again I find myself in complete agreement with the local Wildlife Trust. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

Representation ID: 89872

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Emily Buxton-Woodcock

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed. Stop destroying our planet.

Yes

Representation ID: 89897

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

I agree with the sentiment but this is worryingly light on detail.

No

Representation ID: 89929

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr O Johnson

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 90024

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

Existing biodiversity should be protected and enhanced especially where habitats are well established.

No

Representation ID: 90069

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 90131

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jacqueline Temple

In principle the approach sounds good but at the moment, there's little detail. It's extremely important that nature is protected and that it is accessible to local communities

Yes

Representation ID: 90199

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Hind

We should be looking to improve and protect areas where we have areas where we are lucky enough to have biodiverse land. eg Welcome Hills and surrounding green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 90261

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

We should be supporting biodiversity and those thriving with wildlife and habitats

Yes

Representation ID: 90262

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

It should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists and supporting it in areas it’s already shown to be thriving, with existing wildlife corridors and well-established habitats providing a strong foundation. By focusing on these areas, we can help to create a more resilient and sustainable ecosystem for the future.

No

Representation ID: 90316

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Liz Stone

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.