Yes

Representation ID: 97097

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

This is also needed in areas where housing development has already taken place but the appropriate balancing with spaces for nature have not taken place.

Yes

Representation ID: 97164

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

You should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists, and supporting it in areas
it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

Yes

Representation ID: 97208

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

Other

Representation ID: 97432

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Turner

I neither agree or disagree because your position is so vague and couched in council speak it is incomprehensible

Yes

Representation ID: 97706

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr HUGH KEEP

I believe this to be essential in regaining some of the considerable biodiversity lost in recent decades.

Yes

Representation ID: 97836

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 97886

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

Should be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists, and supporting it in areas it’s already shown to be thriving with existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats. We need to restore our carbon sinks and natural flood defences ie grass lands and woodland and also support the insect population as they are vital for food systems.

Yes

Representation ID: 97917

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

no comment

Yes

Representation ID: 98380

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Newbould

N/A

No

Representation ID: 98627

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

Representation ID: 98651

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ginny White

More ambitious targets are needed if the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021. "Expected to support the principles" is not meaningful enough.

No

Representation ID: 98886

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Friends of Radfords Green Environment (FORGE)

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 98963

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Cotswold District Council

Support

Yes

Representation ID: 99122

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Kennedy

As the LNRS is a statutory requirement this is non-negotiable. However LNRS for the Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull is still in preparation. The next iteration of the draft of the plan should take account of the emerging strategy and ensure that its provisions are hard-wired into the plan. This draft policy direction should also build on the WDC Biodiversity Action Programme and the Warwickshire Wildlife Trust Strategy
(https://www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-08/WWT%20Strategy%202030_final.pdf)

Yes

Representation ID: 99661

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

yes - agree

No

Representation ID: 99731

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Richard Stone -Johnston

Building on green belt land harms both mental health and wildlife. Green spaces provide vital areas for relaxation, reducing stress and promoting overall well-being. Losing these natural environments means fewer opportunities for people to connect with nature, leading to negative effects on mental health. Additionally, green belts are crucial habitats for wildlife, supporting biodiversity and offering refuge for many species. Development disrupts ecosystems, endangering these creatures and reducing the natural balance that benefits both people and wildlife. Protecting green belts is essential for health and environmental sustainability.

Yes

Representation ID: 99756

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Waller

I agree with this policy

No

Representation ID: 99922

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Simpson

The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 99929

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steven Coulsting

I agree with the Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy

No

Representation ID: 100137

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Mary Addyman

No. The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

Yes

Representation ID: 100416

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Adrian Parsons

I absolutely agree with the approach laid out

Other

Representation ID: 100424

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

I agree. However, 30% of land is a relatively low number and I hope the council will not lean on the hope of other areas of the country protecting their parts of the countryside to make up the quota. South Warwickshire has some of the country's most beautiful countryside and should be a priority in terms of protection.

Yes

Representation ID: 100470

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

We need to be enhancing the biodiversity that already exists and support it with nature corridors and protecting existing habitats.

Yes

Representation ID: 100475

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aimee Carter

I wish to particularly emphasise the adherence of this in relation to SG04.
There is a large, connected expanse of land without roads that runs from the rear of the castle all the way through to where SG04 is proposed. The rural area, with minimal road infrastructure the then runs further across towards Leek Wootton / Beausale and Hatton.
This should be given a high priority for protection.

Yes

Representation ID: 100622

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Janine McComiskey

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 100643

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Susan Ray

the plan is contrary to supporting this principle

No

Representation ID: 100757

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Judy Steele

on advice of my local environment group my coomment is: The policy says ‘expected to support the principles’ and this wording isn’t strong enough. If the Councils intend to reach 30% of land dedicated to nature and in recovery by 2030, as stated in the Environment Act 2021, then more ambitious targets are needed.

No

Representation ID: 100778

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

This policy direction is too vague and needs strengthening before comments can be made.

Other

Representation ID: 100892

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Dave Steele

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

Representation ID: 101015

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: H Crook

Please link these nature areas together as fragmented nature areas to not ensure survival of species.
Also need 40%, as 30% too lowThe protection of nature is essential and our absolute duty for future generations.
The west midlands and england in general is an area that is severely depleted in all aspects of nature, and so is even more important to protect it.
Climate change and global warning will damage habitats, trees plants and the insects and animals that they support
Many plants, insects birds and mammals and amphibians are on the red list at high risk of extinction.