Yes

Representation ID: 97833

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 97949

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

no comment

No

Representation ID: 98134

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: William Davis Limited

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

Representation ID: 98538

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Newbould

na

No

Representation ID: 98630

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: X2 New Settlement Consortium

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Other

Representation ID: 98687

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Vital open spaces in designated green belt land that are a key asset to the community should be safeguarded - such as Clopton Quarter in SG18.

Yes

Representation ID: 99034

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Cotswold District Council

Support

Yes

Representation ID: 99170

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Kennedy

Plans should consider increased density of housing to allow for more public open space in developments and greater opportunities for community building.

No

Representation ID: 99332

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

The suggestion that that when this is not possible contributions will be required to enhance or provide new open spaces within 400m of development is inappropriate.

Yes

Representation ID: 99677

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Gillian Padgham

agree

No

Representation ID: 100086

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Welford on Avon Parish Council

Councils should do more that just 'seek' to provide open spaces. they should get actively involved and not just through the planning process.

Yes

Representation ID: 100448

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rebecca Loades

Agreed

Yes

Representation ID: 100490

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Open spaces must be protected.

No

Representation ID: 100811

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Garry Rollason

Development involving the loss of any open space must never be permitted.

Other

Representation ID: 100855

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Judy Steele

If this is enforced then I agree with it.

No

Representation ID: 100923

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

The suggestion that when it is not possible to provide POS on site, contributions will be required to enhance or provide new open spaces within 400m of development is inappropriate and the 400m distance threshold should be removed.

Yes

Representation ID: 101133

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Rowington Landowner Consortium

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

The landowner consortium generally agrees with the policy direction, subject to the detailed policy wording relevant to this policy direction. Larger development proposals including new settlements will likely be able to provide a robust mix of uses complemented by publicly accessible open space thereby providing significant community benefits. The detailed policies should provide sufficient clarity, but include flexibility in consideration of the various site specific requirements.

No

Representation ID: 101226

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land Management Limited

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

Representation ID: 101245

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mac Mic Group

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

Representation ID: 101390

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach. The policy is not consistent with paragraph 104 of the NPPF which provides situations whereby existing open space could be lost to built development. In addition, the delivery of open space within a 400m distance of development should be ‘where possible’ and ‘where it is practical’ for the development rather than a blanket approach. The policy should be amended to reflect this.

No

Representation ID: 101513

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Alderley Holdings Trust

Agent: Mr Jack Barnes

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

No

Representation ID: 101565

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Hallam Land

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

Representation ID: 101642

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal

Support - public space particularly since Covid is of vital importance for its own sake and also for mental and physical health. Policies should be strengthened and protected

No

Representation ID: 101743

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area

Yes

Representation ID: 101900

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Strongly agree

It is vitally important that open spaces will be provided in the first instance onsite within a development.

To echo our comments in 11.8.a, we note that Bishop’s Tachbrook Country Park and the desire, noted in the ‘made’ BTNDP to expand it to provide a buffer zone between Heathcote and BT village does not figure info the maps or descriptions in Section 4 of this draft plan. This is of utmost importance to the Parish Council.

Yes

Representation ID: 102038

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Walkden

Maintaining existing open spaces has to be the priority especially around existing urban areas

Other

Representation ID: 102248

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: IM Land 1 Limited

Agent: Turley

89. IM Land note that the intent of the policy is positive. The definition of open space should be included in policy wording and so that is clear for everyone, reducing ambiguity and potential disputes. The first bullet point should be updated to the following,
“Development involving the loss of open space of public value will not be permitted unless significant public benefits outweigh the loss.”
90. IM Land would welcome an opportunity to review and comments on the future guidance referred to within Draft Policy Direction 43c.

No

Representation ID: 102381

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Richborough

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.

Yes

Representation ID: 102466

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: BDW Trading Limited

Agent: Knight Frank LLP

BDW generally agrees with the policy direction, subject to the detailed policy wording relevant to this policy direction. Larger development proposals, such as the site at Cophams Hill, will likely be able to provide a robust mix of uses complemented by publicly accessible open space thereby providing significant community benefits. The detailed policies should provide sufficient clarity but include flexibility in consideration of the various site-specific requirements.

No

Representation ID: 103126

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Marrons

Protection of existing open spaces is important, however the emerging policy should refer to the varying qualities of open space in applying any safeguarding approach.