Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 145

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90818

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Maria Sacristan

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarters’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restrain for open landscape, nature conservation and has potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90892

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be designated as an area of restraint to preserve open landscapes and support nature conservation. This land, classified as grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land, holds significant potential for food production. Its unique characteristics and agricultural value make it crucial to protect from urban development, ensuring it remains available for sustainable farming practices. By identifying ‘Clopton Quarter’ as a greenbelt, authorities can safeguard its environmental and agricultural benefits, contributing to the region’s ecological balance and food security.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90913

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma Barber

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be designated as a protected area to preserve open landscapes and support nature conservation. This land, classified as grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land, has significant potential for food production. Its unique characteristics and agricultural value make it crucial to protect it from urban development, ensuring it remains available for sustainable farming practices. By recognising ‘Clopton Quarter’ as a greenbelt, authorities can safeguard its environmental and agricultural benefits, contributing to the region’s ecological balance and food security.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90957

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

Representation Summary:

Greenbelt land should be protected and safeguarded.
The Clopton Quarter of SG18 should be included as an area of restraint for open landscape views from public right of ways, nature conservation and enhancement.
This land has the potential for grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91230

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

Representation Summary:

‘Radford Semele Parish Council strongly supports the use of Areas of Restraint. The Radford
Semele Neighbourhood plan includes an Area of Separation to prevent coalescence of
Leamington Spa/Whitnash with Radford Semele. These areas are essential to protect the
character of some communities and should be protected against any form of development.’

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91374

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Giles Dugmore

Representation Summary:

Site 492 Land at The Greens, South of Alcester Road, SuA, and site 827 South of Alcester Road, SuA: Whilst I support the general AOR concept I strongly object to the review of Stratford designations. This is because a review will inevitably erode designations and lead to more inappropriate development on previously designated sites. The only community benefit of a development on this site will be to the home dwellers. The rest of the community will lose a green field, equestrian AOR and suffer from the development disturbance and ongoing traffic and environmental impact. Developers will exaggerate the community benefit.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91408

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

Representation Summary:

The proposals are good in principle, but it is unclear if this will be used as a replacement for the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91427

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Bev Atkinson

Representation Summary:

Land at The Greens, South of Alcester Road, Stratford upon Avon (492) and South of Alcester Road, Stratford-upon-Avon. (827)

I support the AOR policy in principle but forcefully object to reviewing Stratford designations. This will result in more inappropriate development and erode designations.

There are no demonstrable 'community benefits'. The community will lose a medieval ridge and furrow green field and suffer from development disturbances, ongoing traffic and environmental impact. Development on 492 and 827 will cause harm to the open nature of this area and to the conservation of nature and biodiversity.
Developers will exaggerate the community benefit

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91519

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mary Adams

Representation Summary:

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91594

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

Representation Summary:

It sounds a good idea - I wonder what Stratford's experience has been. Hopefully the new wording will benefit from their past exeperience.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91722

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Representation Summary:

Sensible

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91796

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

Representation Summary:

n/a

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91825

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tim Burridge

Representation Summary:

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91865

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hanno Kirner

Representation Summary:

We need to protect the Clopton/Welcombe Hill area and make them areas of restraint (SG18)

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91919

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92440

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint ; it is currently used for food production and is Grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92518

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Representation Summary:

Agree but very subjective.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92657

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Bex Thomson

Representation Summary:

No comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92729

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Luke Kempton

Representation Summary:

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92842

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Carolyn Stacey

Representation Summary:

Greenbelt land should absolutely be maintained as that (e.g. Clopton Quarter section of SG18). This land is biodiverse relative to the adjoining urban area and has potential to reduce future emissions through food production therefore reducing food miles etc.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93024

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Representation Summary:

SG18 Clopton Quarter should be identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and potential for food production.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93228

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

Representation Summary:

In principle yes. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93345

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr geoff marston

Representation Summary:

Yes, but only in principle.
Clarity is needed as to whether this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations. These should already be included and given substantial weight within the Plan . Housing allocations should not be included within Green Belts!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93405

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

Representation Summary:

There is a benefit to people's well-being of having open spaces retained

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93489

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Vivien Haggarty

Representation Summary:

Open spaces play an imporrtant part in people's the well-being

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93620

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

Representation Summary:

I agree with this policy because the greenbelt land of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be protected as an area of restraint. Its open landscape supports nature conservation, providing vital habitats for wildlife. Additionally, as Grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land, it has the potential for food production, contributing to local and sustainable farming. Preserving this land ensures environmental and agricultural benefits while preventing unnecessary development. Protecting Clopton Quarter aligns with long-term sustainability goals and responsible land use.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93686

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

Representation Summary:

I support this policy because the greenbelt land of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be safeguarded as an area of restraint. Its open landscape plays a crucial role in nature conservation, offering essential habitats for wildlife. Additionally, as Grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land, it holds significant potential for sustainable food production. Preserving this land protects both environmental and agricultural resources while preventing harmful development. Safeguarding Clopton Quarter aligns with sustainable land use and ensures long-term benefits for both nature and local communities.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93780

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr George Power

Representation Summary:

The Clopton Quarter area of SG18 really needs to be considered as an 'Area of Restraint'. This land has the possibility of being used for food production as versatile agricultural land, as well being an area of important biodiversity.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94137

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

Representation Summary:

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94161

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

Representation Summary:

Clopton quarter of SG18 section should be protected as an area of restraint to ensure the conservation of open spaces and wildlife. It is green belt land that should instead be used for food production.