Yes

Representation ID: 94168

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

The greenbelt land of 'Clopton Quarter' in SG18 needs to be identified as an area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation, and food production - it has the potential for the latter as it is a Grade 3 for Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Representation ID: 94317

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Ms M Walker

`

Yes

Representation ID: 94373

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

In SG18, the greenbelt land of 'Clopton Quarter' should be an identified area of restraint for nature conservation and open landscape. It has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Representation ID: 94965

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

The area 'Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be an indentified area of restraint fro opne landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agriculturla Land.

Yes

Representation ID: 95094

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

The greenbelt of Clopton is needs to be protected from development for multiple reasons to include versatile agricultural land to nature conversation to wild grass to dog walkers.

Other

Representation ID: 95282

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts should not include housing allocations.

Other

Representation ID: 95297

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

"Some developers felt that the areas could be captured in landscape and historic policies." They would, wouldn’t they!

The suggestion that existing areas of constraint are to be reviewed is deeply concerning. If they are within the current SoA Core Strategy they should remain protected.

"Projects which enhance the character and visual amenity of Areas of Restraint will be encouraged" We disagree because it will invite developers to bring forward schemes which negate the original justification for the restraint.

We support the promotion of beneficial uses such as public access, nature conservation and food production.

Yes

Representation ID: 95383

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Yes but this contradicts with the preferred sites selection. For clopton quarter SG18, development has been previously rejected on the grounds that development would create a major incursion into attractive open countryside which provides an important setting into the town. It feels like it is acknowledged this area has certain historical significance yet it has been put forward as a preferred option? Therefore, agree that 'planning' should abide by its own words and retain this area which it has said itself is significant to the character of stratford

Other

Representation ID: 95386

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Lee Tallen

Re Clopton quarter SG18 - Would also like to add that areas of restraint should not include concete-ing over farm land which i believe has been assessed as 'versatile'.

Yes

Representation ID: 95477

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sue Cuff

in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Representation ID: 95487

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Barrie Goodman

The Greenbelt in SG18 should be an area of restraint as its been identified as grade 3 agricultural land. If we develop our agricultural land we will have nowhere to grow crops.

Other

Representation ID: 95539

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Martin Freeman

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt,
green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in
the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Representation ID: 95666

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr James Davis

The green belt land of Clopton Quarter in SG18 should be an area of restraint for its open landscape, nature conservation and agricultural land.

No

Representation ID: 95717

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: David Wilson Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.

Yes

Representation ID: 95899

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Carter

The use of Areas of Restraint is strongly supported. The Radford Semele Neighbourhood plan includes an Area of Separation to prevent coalescence of Leamington Spa/Whitnash with Radford Semele. These areas are essential to protect the character of communities and should be protected against any form of development.

Yes

Representation ID: 95977

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes

Yes

Representation ID: 96135

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Collier

Yes, in principle. It is not clear if this allocation will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure corridors and Wildbelt designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight. Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations.

Yes

Representation ID: 96372

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Southam Town Council

Southam’s Town, District and County elected representatives support this Draft Policy Direction but would like to understand the criteria under which any review of existing AORs would be made.

Yes

Representation ID: 96503

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Shipston Town Council

More use needs to be made of this option in the future.

Yes

Representation ID: 96684

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Nixon

In principle but should not replace green belt and green belts should not include housing.

Other

Representation ID: 96861

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

The character of Wilmcote and Bearley would be completely changed. The peace of the countryside would end and this would impact on the well being and mental health of the residents.

Yes

Representation ID: 97106

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Alcester Town Council

This approach is agreed by Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’).

Yes

Representation ID: 97166

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: John Dinnie

This has the potential to be a powerful instrument in improving the healthy natural environment of South Warwickshire. However, it also has to apply where housing development has already taken place and needs to be rebalanced by thoughtful green development of open spaces.

Yes

Representation ID: 97189

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emily Morris

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Representation ID: 97233

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tysoe Parish Council

Yes

No

Representation ID: 97486

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Spitfire Bespoke Homes

Agent: Harris Lamb

No. The areas of restraint are local landscape designations. There is no provision in the NPPF for the inclusion of local landscape designations in Local Plans. Paragraph 187a of the NPPF requires planning polices to protect and enhance “valued” landscapes only. The guidance in Section 15 of the NPPF is adequate to deal with local landscape matters.

Yes

Representation ID: 97772

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Gary Jeffery

Settlement B7 would impact negatively on Wilmcote where Mary Arden's House and Farm positively influence the character of the village and also Stratford, both inextricably involved with Shakespeare and the attendant tourist trade.

Yes

Representation ID: 97903

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Stafford-scott

The greenbelt land of ‘Clopton Quarter’ in SG18 should be an identified area of restraint for open
landscape, nature conservation and has the potential for food production being grade 3 Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land.

Yes

Representation ID: 97959

Received: 05/03/2025

Respondent: Brenda Stewart

In particular I feel that the parcel of land SG 18 at Clopton should be included as an Area of Restraint as it is good agricultural land, a wildlife corridor and an green, open space amenity for people living in that area.

Yes

Representation ID: 98694

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Alice Hibbert

Any greenbelt areas connected to sites of ecological importance like Nature reserves should be identified as areas of restraint. Clopton Quarter in SG18 in particular should be a designated area of restraint for it's open landscape, nature conservation with the potential for sustainable future food production.

It's unclear if this will be used to replace the important Green Belt, green infrastructure and wildlife corridor designations which should already be included in the Plan and given substantial weight.