Other

Representation ID: 85978

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Susan Archer

Protection should be given to Special Landscape Area and this should be a high priority in any development decision.

Yes

Representation ID: 86146

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 86709

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Keeping South Warwickshire's character as a rural area is vital to maintaining and enhancing its character, in one of the most nature depleted nations of the world.

No

Representation ID: 86958

Received: 31/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

"High quality" and Stratford-upon-Avon are far away from each other at present and nothing read in this document indicates any improvement

Yes

Representation ID: 87108

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

Yes

Other

Representation ID: 87115

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Steph Johnson

I believe these areas should exist but don't see the point of them if they do not restrict development. There is no reason to build in these areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 87441

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

Representation ID: 87616

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 88859

Received: 18/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89112

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

Representation ID: 89158

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

any development within the green belt will damage the natural landscape

Other

Representation ID: 89178

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mr nigel Freeth

just dont build on the green belt land

Yes

Representation ID: 89298

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Jon Knight

Considering the landscapes around some of Stratford's main tourist attractions are part of their attraction, and that is a major employer/income generator in the area, maintaining this designation seems like a very good idea.

Yes

Representation ID: 89417

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Twynam

Agree

Other

Representation ID: 89654

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Simon Cook

I agree with Warwickshire Wildlife Trust that this policy needs stronger wording. It currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Other

Representation ID: 89884

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Emily Buxton-Woodcock

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant. Stop destroying our planet.

Yes

Representation ID: 89914

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Stephen Browett

I agree with the sentiment but am concerned with the lack on detail on this point.

No

Representation ID: 89937

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr O Johnson

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 90031

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Fiona Macvie

Protection of Stratford's special; landscape areas is most important.

Other

Representation ID: 90076

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Other

Representation ID: 90288

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maria Giblin

Areas where a SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected.

Other

Representation ID: 90290

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Dean Giblin

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected to ensure the sustainability and preservation of these regions.

Other

Representation ID: 90347

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Julia Gibson

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 90461

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sheetal Tailor

These areas must be protected.

Other

Representation ID: 90610

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Pack

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 90759

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Tim Goodwin

All areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected from development.

Other

Representation ID: 90897

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James Morris

Urbanisation poses significant threats to areas where SLAs will be negatively impacted, necessitating their protection. As towns/cities expand, these regions face increased pressure from development, leading to habitat destruction and fragmentation. This not only affects the biodiversity but also disrupts the ecological balance, potentially causing irreversible damage. Implementing protective measures, such as zoning laws and conservation efforts, can help preserve these vital areas. By doing so, we ensure that urban growth does not come at the expense of natural habitats, safeguarding the environment for future generations. Prioritising the protection of SLAs is crucial for maintaining ecological health amidst urban expansion.

Other

Representation ID: 90915

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Emma Barber

Urbanisation poses significant threats to areas where SLAs will be negatively impacted, necessitating their protection. As towns and cities expand, these regions face increased pressure from development, leading to habitat destruction. This not only affects biodiversity but also disrupts the ecological balance, potentially causing irreversible damage. Implementing protective measures, like zoning laws and conservation efforts, can help preserve these vital areas. By doing so, we ensure that urban growth does not come at the expense of natural habitats, safeguarding the environment for future generations. Prioritising the protection of these areas is crucial for maintaining ecological health amidst urban expansion.

No

Representation ID: 90958

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Jason Lupton

The Special Landscape Area designation should restrict development.
These areas, if developed, will change permanently and piece by piece this will alter the wider character.

Yes

Representation ID: 91232

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Radford Semele Parish Council

‘Radford Semele Parish Council agrees with this proposal provided that it is used to protect
and enhance the range of various landscape types in the area and that this designation
doesn’t become a Green Belt by any other name thus restricting development to an everdecreasing part of the area.