No

Representation ID: 91410

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

No

Representation ID: 91523

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mary Adams

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 91597

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sidney Syson

No further comments

Yes

Representation ID: 91724

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Norman

Sensible

No

Representation ID: 91798

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Joanne Taylor

they should be kept as Special Landscapes

Other

Representation ID: 91828

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Tim Burridge

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 91866

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Hanno Kirner

SLAs should not be negatively impacted by new developments

Yes

Representation ID: 91921

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Donna Goodwin

All areas where Special Landscape Areas will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected from development.

Other

Representation ID: 92270

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Isobel McLauchlin

Any Special Landscape Areas that would be negatively impacted by increased urbanisation should be protected for the people now, and in the future.

Yes

Representation ID: 92442

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Christine Slaughter

Special Landscape Areas should be protected from irreversible urbanisation.

Yes

Representation ID: 92520

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

Representation ID: 92700

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Nigel Briggs

This must also include the Forest of Arden Special Landscape Area.

Other

Representation ID: 92732

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Luke Kempton

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant

Other

Representation ID: 93026

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Dominic Momcilovic

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affect baby urbanisation should be protected

Yes

Representation ID: 93048

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Alison Blake

If not addressed in other statutes

Other

Representation ID: 93216

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Martina Hunt

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally Affected by urbanisation should be protected.

No

Representation ID: 93231

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Kim Salmon

This policy needs stronger wording as it currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development. In these areas, which are valuable for wildlife, development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Other

Representation ID: 93353

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr geoff marston

The policy needs far clearer and stronger wording. It currently states that the SLA designation will not restrict development in these areas. However these areas are valuable for wildlife and so development must be restricted and directed towards lower value areas, where the impact on nature will not be so significant.

Yes

Representation ID: 93408

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Haggarty

N/A

Yes

Representation ID: 93624

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr JAMES STEWART

I agree with this policy because areas with special landscapes should be protected from harmful urbanization. These landscapes are valuable for their natural beauty, biodiversity, and cultural significance. Uncontrolled development threatens their character, disrupting ecosystems and diminishing their environmental and recreational benefits. Safeguarding these locations ensures they remain unspoiled for future generations while maintaining ecological balance. Prioritizing protection over urban expansion helps preserve the unique identity of these areas and supports sustainable land management.

Yes

Representation ID: 93688

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Claire STEWART

I agree with this policy because areas with special landscapes should be protected from harmful urbanization. These landscapes are valuable for their natural beauty, biodiversity, and cultural significance. Uncontrolled development threatens their character, disrupting ecosystems and diminishing their environmental and recreational benefits. Safeguarding these locations ensures they remain unspoiled for future generations while maintaining ecological balance. Prioritizing protection over urban expansion helps preserve the unique identity of these areas and supports sustainable land management.

Yes

Representation ID: 93820

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr William Campbell

Strongly agree

Yes

Representation ID: 94138

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Kelly

Areas where SLA will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected.

Other

Representation ID: 94166

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Samantha Stafford Scott

The SLA designation should protect areas of SLA from damaging urban sprawl.

Other

Representation ID: 94171

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Holly Whittaker

Areas including the Clopton Quarter in SG18, that are designated 'Special Landscape Areas', would be detrimentally affected by urbanisation and need to be protected at all costs. This is to save the biodiversity that already exists within these areas across South Warwickshire, including existing wildlife corridors and well established habitats.

Yes

Representation ID: 94372

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Alan Blandamer

Areas where Special Landscape Areas will be detrimentally affected by urbanisation should be protected.

Other

Representation ID: 94966

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Ainsworth

Areas that SLAncan be badly adffected by development should be protected.

Other

Representation ID: 95097

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Tracey Grimes

It has to be protected, no development.

Other

Representation ID: 95291

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Emma Restall Orr

Development should not be allowed in the area, and the caveats should be removed (such as that ‘unless there would be an over-riding benefit, for instance to meet an evidenced local housing need’). The Local Plan should be allocating suitable land for housing need.

Yes

Representation ID: 95304

Received: 04/03/2025

Respondent: Kineton Parish Council

no further comment