No

Representation ID: 86015

Received: 11/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Pashley

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

Yes

Representation ID: 86153

Received: 12/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Andy Smith

I support the various efforts to attract battery gigafactory investment to the area, but certainty should be provided to those aviation businesses still on site. Perhaps a strong commitment to aviation at Wellesbourne in perpetuity would give those businesses an alternative?

Yes

Representation ID: 86193

Received: 15/01/2025

Respondent: Professor Paul Bywaters

.

Yes

Representation ID: 86228

Received: 16/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Alice Hobson

If housing replaces the airport then I am strongly in favour as this is a more economical use of this land

Yes

Representation ID: 86262

Received: 18/01/2025

Respondent: Ms Ruth Buckley

We agree subject to this being used for South Warwickshire requirements and not Coventry.

Yes

Representation ID: 86291

Received: 20/01/2025

Respondent: Timothy Muggeridge

This would be a great use of a brownfield site in greenbelt land

Yes

Representation ID: 86550

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Reduces travel time and pollution by keeping development to the borders of already developed areas.

Yes

Representation ID: 86596

Received: 28/01/2025

Respondent: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Suggested development appears to be an extension of similar existing use.

Yes

Representation ID: 86644

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Mr James Swan

Close to transport links and good local infrastructure. Less impact on open countryside than some other options.

Yes

Representation ID: 86724

Received: 29/01/2025

Respondent: Miss Claire Whitehouse

If current land is unused, it’s more preferable to build there than on green belt land. Good access routes.

Yes

Representation ID: 86808

Received: 30/01/2025

Respondent: Mr GERALD KELLY

Perfect location for additional housing near to Coventry and businesses/employment.

No

Representation ID: 86996

Received: 02/02/2025

Respondent: S Gardner

What this would be designated for is unclear.

Yes

Representation ID: 87031

Received: 03/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Judith Corless

good for small businesses, offices, industry. Also some housing. Road links have been improved in /coventry over the last few years.

Yes

Representation ID: 87335

Received: 08/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr Andrew Day

Only for employment Investment Zone purposes

Yes

Representation ID: 87492

Received: 09/02/2025

Respondent: mrs susan morris

I agree

Yes

Representation ID: 87684

Received: 10/02/2025

Respondent: Mr justin kerridge

yes

Yes

Representation ID: 87978

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

This is an established commercial area so it would be makes sense.

Yes

Representation ID: 87979

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Quantrill

This is an established commercial area.

Yes

Representation ID: 88062

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs vivien bryer

People employed in the new high tech hub surrounding the airport would be nearer their place of work reducing travel stress and environmental damage.

No

Representation ID: 88066

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Jeanette Ray

This is green belt land.
Kenilworth doesn’t have the infrastructure to cope with more houses and people.
Roads are inadequate and won’t be able to accommodate increased traffic

Yes

Representation ID: 88131

Received: 13/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anne Parry

Support in view of its sustainable location.

Yes

Representation ID: 88163

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Rozanne Harris

SG03 is either already in or directly adjacent to a highly populated area. The road infrastructure is already in place.

Yes

Representation ID: 88228

Received: 14/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Absolutely 100%. Regeneration of land (brownfield) in an area in need of. To market and bring new businesses and housing. Having lived in Warwickshire all my life it has disappointed me how the City of Coventry has declined over the years when it was once a vibrant hub. It is time to regenerate Coventry over the next 25 years and make it a place to go - socially, to live and to work.

Yes

Representation ID: 88616

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Jerry Corless

Currently industrial areas, allows easy access to employment and national road system.

Yes

Representation ID: 88680

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Crispin Passmore

without reservation this is a huge employment opportunity to be developed. But it has to be done jointly with Coventry

Yes

Representation ID: 88686

Received: 17/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Gillian Browne

This land is not designated green belt land, it has good infrastructure e.g. motorway links and has good employment opportunities.

Yes

Representation ID: 89024

Received: 19/02/2025

Respondent: Mrs Sara Bird

Brownfield site so should be priority area

Yes

Representation ID: 89377

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Cllr David Armstrong

This land is in my opinion prime land for inclusion due to the ex-airport use, proximity to Coventry and that road network.

Other

Representation ID: 89448

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Andrew Brooks

It would be beter to rewild this airport site and give nature some sort of fighting chance, however it is pretty much environmentally dead so may be less harmful to build on than some other proposed sites

No

Representation ID: 89512

Received: 20/02/2025

Respondent: Miss Emily Carleton

This is green belt land. Avoid building on it wherever possible.