Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 129

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89712

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Dodd

Representation Summary:

I believe this is an ideal location for a strategic growth area. I understand that bus routes have already been made available to this area or nearby and this would be vital to make sure that it is connected to Coventry as well as Leamington and Warwick so as to end a reliance on needing a car in order to get anywhere which has become a common theme in recent housing development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89724

Received: 21/02/2025

Respondent: Compton Verney

Representation Summary:

n/a

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 89987

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Mr Kulbir Birak

Representation Summary:

Located close to well developed infrastructure (e.g. major roads, major supermarkets etc), therefore not placing burden on existing elements.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90080

Received: 22/02/2025

Respondent: Catherine Hewson

Representation Summary:

Stonebridge Meadows LWS and River Sowe Potential local Wildlife Site

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90282

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Liz Stone

Representation Summary:

n/a

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90379

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Jayne Jones

Representation Summary:

having lived in this area for nearly 30 years, this brownfield site has been the topic of much debate, and potentially for industry. Given infrastructure in this area, mixed residential/industry would be possible

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90399

Received: 23/02/2025

Respondent: Dr Louise Stewart

Representation Summary:

Adds to existing well established infrastructure and having airport facilities may make it more attractive to a number of logistics organisations who don’t want to use existing airports. Significant opportunity for expansion if employment opportunities with associated housing for workers who would then have a minimal commute. already provides employment with significant further opportunity for expansion. Business owners do not want to come to a brand new site with no facilities, it is too risky for them in an already challenging economy.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90609

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Malcolm Fisk

Representation Summary:

It represents the use of existing brown field site
There is good road access recently improved to accommodate such expansion
it will provide much needed job opportunities to the Coventry area

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90681

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Averil Stewart

Representation Summary:

excellent road infrastructure already delivered by the works on the bypass, it would be more logical to be using land like this than pristine farmland. Britian needs better food security for the future so land like this should be the logical solution for development

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90761

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Mr N Ledger

Representation Summary:

Worthy of more detailed consideration

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 90773

Received: 24/02/2025

Respondent: Maxine Mayer

Representation Summary:

Both SWLP and Coventry councils need to be realistic about the viability of Coventry Airport battery factory. Many global organisations have looked at this site and assessed it as requiring significant costly infrastructure which the government refuses to financially support. So is this site truly needed?

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91001

Received: 25/02/2025

Respondent: Julian Brown

Representation Summary:

Agree. Logical location and very much want to see Coventry re-urbanised and developed to make Coventry a great place to live and work. Work should be done on re-urbanising run down areas to stimulate investment, growth and job opportunities and safe places to live. Developing the Airport site is an intrinsic part to this.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91419

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

Representation Summary:

The proposal will impact the following Local Wildlife Sites: Stonebridge Meadows LWS and River Sowe Potential local Wildlife Site

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91490

Received: 26/02/2025

Respondent: Beth Palmer

Representation Summary:

Encroaching on the smaller villages

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 91925

Received: 27/02/2025

Respondent: Mr James OShea

Representation Summary:

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92290

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Harbury Parish Council

Representation Summary:

Yes this seems appropriate, given the proximity to Coventry

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92745

Received: 28/02/2025

Respondent: Raymond Joyce

Representation Summary:

Coventry Airport does not have an effective green belt separating Coventry City from SG03. It is very close to plentiful employment opportunities in distribution and warehousing and logistics and the expansion of Coventry airport. It also straddles the A45 and has excellent links to the motorway network and the rail network.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 92892

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ed Molloy

Representation Summary:

Good location for Tech Park, JLR, Industrial estates. Close to Coventry.

Area has been built upon and around so less impact than other sites.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93136

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Jon Redhead

Representation Summary:

The development would be an opportunity for growth with its close proximity to employment and infrastructure. Very close to A46 and other major road network. Impact on a disused airport site would be a far better proposition than destruction of Green belt land. There is far more scope for development of a revised road network that could cope more easily with increased capacity without very much impact.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93160

Received: 01/03/2025

Respondent: Jean Nixon

Representation Summary:

Land in this area has already been developed for industrial use and other developments are on the way. If it brings jobs to the area to support the housing developments nearby it would be a good thing. The area Stonebridge Meadows and areas around the River Sowe need to be protected for wildlife. The site has excellent existing road links to A46/M40/M69/M6 and A45/M1

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93415

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Bernard Davis

Representation Summary:

This area is currently a disused airfield surrounded by industry and is af very little value as green belt. If there was ever a csae to re-designate green belt, this is probably it. There are excellent existing road links and employment opportunities, although other infrastructure improvements would be needed (schools, doctors, etc)

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93597

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Christopher Bennett

Representation Summary:

Proximity to Coventry makes this site extremely suitable to provide the additional homes needed by the population of the City of Coventry and is well supported by the existing infrastructure with the A45 and A46 with additional close access to the M6. The role of Coventry Airport has diminished significantly in recent years and with power and other essential services already in place it could be completely repurposed for housing.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 93933

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Beverley Comley

Representation Summary:

No comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94045

Received: 02/03/2025

Respondent: Mr John Clayton

Representation Summary:

This is an excellent site for further development having all the associated infrastructure requirements in place.
It is currently a brown field site which would benefit from further development.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94208

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Andrew Close

Representation Summary:

This location should be considered for development and a mix of land uses should be offered to residents to review not just employment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94219

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: mr william tansey

Representation Summary:

Disagree.
In an area this densely populated, accepting and supporting the safeguards that the West Midlands Greenbelt has made to defending identities of our towns and cities; providing access to green-space and preventing urbanisation should not be understated. Of all the proposed greenbelt development areas this is perhaps the most forgivable to consider.
The supporting sustainability appraisal you have submitted suggests that there is enough strategic growth capacity at locations outside the greenbelt to meet the local plan dwelling requirements to 2050.
The exceptional circumstances required to include this land are therefore still not actually met.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94427

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Representation Summary:

This is already an established business development area with excellent road links to M1 and M6.
Proximity to Coventry, so already got good public transport links which would be easy to develop further as needed.
There are currently well known companies operating in that area which would help entice other businesses to invest in that area.
Using a brownfield site rather than using up valuable green belt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94446

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Belinda Brown

Representation Summary:

This location is made up entirely of greenbelt land and should therefore be protected from development. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites available!

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94649

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mr David Hammond

Representation Summary:

.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Representation ID: 94700

Received: 03/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Caroline Jackson

Representation Summary:

N/A