Yes

Representation ID: 99737

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

Part of Coventry Airport development zone.

Yes

Representation ID: 99749

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Geoff Cooper

Existing development and local roads accommodate this

Yes

Representation ID: 99786

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Miss Sabrina Hasnaoui

The classification and characteristics of this area as green belt land should be considered. In reality this is a private airfield with no active use. This area is well placed near to the amenities and transport links of Coventry (including London and Birmingham via train) , as well as good access to employment opportunities in Coventry and beyond.

No

Representation ID: 99860

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Eaton

Housing needs can be met without the use of any green belt land.
Very little objective data published on “sustainability rating” of this or any other green belt site.

No

Representation ID: 99895

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Timothy & Di Griffiths

The destruction of the UK's General Aviation airfields is a dreadful mistake and failure of long term planning and industrial strategy.
It is clear that multi rota drones transporting goods across the whole of the nations airspace in any direction is both an accident waiting to happen and technically difficult. However, Electric and other alternative fueled fixed wing aircraft and drones could have a great future, but they need tarmac runways. To dig them all up for other projects will probably lead to them all needed to be replaced. Save Coventry Airfield!

Yes

Representation ID: 99981

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Evan Bailey

Makes sense to develop existing industrial site for businesses. Not suitable for housing.

Yes

Representation ID: 100017

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neil Brooker

This Location is more suitable for development than others in the district.

No

Representation ID: 100156

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Philip Wall

Fully opposed to any development on Green Belt Land.

No

Representation ID: 100323

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Deborah Carter

Completely opposed to any development on Green Belt land.

No

Representation ID: 100398

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Aimee Carter

There are far better alternatives than destroying this Green Belt land.

No

Representation ID: 100418

Received: 06/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Anita Barnwell

Planning permission for the Gigafactory is due to expire. No investor has been found. JLR have not delivered on their promised investment. The high pitched noises that emanate from UKBIC have been affecting the health and well-being of Baginton residents for a considerable number of years. The dangers of a Gigafactory so close to a residential village have not been properly thought through and the loss of green-belt land would be catastrophic. An investment in turning the airport back to a fully functioning one would bring further investment to the area as well as supporting the niche trades within.

No

Representation ID: 100651

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Maureen Rawlings

This is Green Belt land and should not be built on.

Yes

Representation ID: 100829

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon Collyer

Linking housing to employment options makes a lot of sense as does building near major road networks.

Yes

Representation ID: 100990

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Nicola Sawle

again large amount of infrastructure has already occurred in that region that further housing would be accomodated

No

Representation ID: 101048

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Zoe Leventhal

No very special circumstances exist here to justify removal of land from GB, when other brownfield and non GB sites available.

Yes

Representation ID: 102032

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Simon HARRISON

Supportive of development at this location

Other

Representation ID: 102718

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Severn Trent Water

This development will likely require treatment at Coventry - Finham (STW) Wastewater Treatment Works, this Wastewater Treatment Works has medium capacity constraints and very high environmental constraints. Due to the size of the development, it is recommended that network upgrades will be required, alongside hydraulic modelling and engagement with STW. Overall this development site is considered a medium/high risk location, there is some capacity however in order to accommodate growth, infrastructure upgrades will be required and we would need to work closely to understand build timelines, in order to plan accordingly.

No

Representation ID: 102830

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Howard Easton

The destruction of the greenbelt is of grave concern.
Given that all maps fail to include the route of HS2, the impact of these plans fail to indicate the how much of Warwickshire is going to be destroyed by these myopic proposals.

No

Representation ID: 102937

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Howard Easton

Given that all maps fail to include the route of HS2, the impact of these plans fail to indicate the how much of Warwickshire is going to be destroyed by these myopic proposals.

Yes

Representation ID: 103059

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Neal Appleton

Whilst the aim is for people to live close to where they work and for Active Travel to be a priority, it must be acknowledged that people often choose to reside and work in different places. Commuting is the norm and the SWLP must accommodate this. Settlement expansion and locations of new settlements must be supported by transport infrastructure.

Yes

Representation ID: 103390

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Keith Allan

As the airfield is no longer in use and businesses are near by providing employment, this would provide a development opportunity even though this is currently green belt land

No

Representation ID: 103445

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Dr Diana Taulbut

Coventry Airport is an irreplaceable facility. It supports the UK's aviation and helps in the training of pilots and aviation jobs. In disregard of the NPPF and aviation/defence considerations, aerodromes have been put out of action across the country and it is a very worrying situation. Destroying an functioning airport is insane. General aviation feeds into commercial aviation by providing a way of learning skills, from piloting to aviation mechanics, air traffic controllers, ground maintenance, etc. You can build a factory on any business park but not an airport. One day it'll be bitterly regretted.

Other

Representation ID: 103474

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Ms Sarah Shalgosky

Before doing anything here you should produce a detailed analysis of impact on Stonebridge Meadows LWS and River Sowe Potential local Wildlife Site

No

Representation ID: 103724

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Steve Churchill

Coventry Airport should remain an Airport to provide local jobs and transport links for local business.

Yes

Representation ID: 104053

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Amanda Waters

Yes, next to existing employment areas or employment development areas and good transport links

No

Representation ID: 104324

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Carl Bergstrom

NO

Yes

Representation ID: 104340

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Jean Nixon

Much of this area has already been developed or earmarked for industrial use. It will bring jobs to the area to support the housing nearby. The area of Stonebridge Meadows and River Sowe need to be protected for wildlife. The site has excellent road links to A46/M40/M69/M6 and A45 /M1.

No

Representation ID: 104512

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mrs Kay Williams

This is green belt land and we need to protect our nature! Please build on non green belt land.

Other

Representation ID: 104537

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

YES ONLY IF the development is high density, linked with public transport and active travel infrastructure.

Do not build detached homes anywhere.
Painted bicycle gutters are NOT active travel infrastructure.
A bus is a bad public transport solution.

Yes

Representation ID: 104607

Received: 07/03/2025

Respondent: Mr Ian Dunning

Stop building sprawling car-dependent suburbia. You are killing people with these decisions. Cars kill people, stop making people have to get in their cars to get to places. Build high density walkable neighbourhoods with active travel infrastructure.

Paint is not cycling infrastructure.
Buses are bad public transport.
Don't build any detached houses.